General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsDelphinus
(11,824 posts)I thought he did a good job.
Hortensis
(58,785 posts)I did not imagine that possible in the United States of America.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/health/2021/10/04/nih-collins-step-down/
+1 million, Dr. Collins.
blogslug
(37,981 posts)He's had a long, distinguished career and he's 71.
womanofthehills
(8,657 posts)Is he taking a jab at Fauci who has been at NIAIH for 50 yrs - 38 as director?
There comes a time where an institution like NIH really benefits from new vision, new leadership, Collins, 71, said in an interview with The Washington Post. This was the right timing.
blogslug
(37,981 posts)Unless you know something about the lives of these men that I don't know, I'm going with him retiring because he can.
womanofthehills
(8,657 posts)About money that went to Eco Health Alliance. I find him interesting because he is known as the scientist who believes on god. He is a conservative evangelical Christian.
https://www.cnn.com/2007/US/04/03/collins.commentary/index.html
U.S. News
CNN Exchange: Commentary
Collins: Why this scientist believes in God
POSTED: 9:37 a.m. EDT, April 6, 2007
By Dr. Francis Collins
Editor's note: Francis S. Collins, M.D., Ph.D., is the director of the Human Genome Project. His most recent book is "The Language of God: A Scientist Presents Evidence for Belief."
ROCKVILLE, Maryland (CNN) -- I am a scientist and a believer, and I find no conflict between those world
So, some have asked, doesn't your brain explode? Can you both pursue an understanding of how life works using the tools of genetics and molecular biology, and worship a creator God? Aren't evolution and faith in God incompatible? Can a scientist believe in miracles like the resurrection?
Actually, I find no conflict here, and neither apparently do the 40 percent of working scientists who claim to be believers. Yes, evolution by descent from a common ancestor is clearly true. If there was any lingering doubt about the evidence from the fossil record, the study of DNA provides the strongest possible proof of our relatedness to all other living things.
But why couldn't this be God's plan for creation? True, this is incompatible with an ultra-literal interpretation of Genesis, but long before Darwin, there were many thoughtful interpreters like St. Augustine, who found it impossible to be exactly sure what the meaning of that amazing creation story was supposed to be. So attaching oneself to such literal interpretations in the face of compelling scientific evidence pointing to the ancient age of Earth and the relatedness of living things by evolution seems neither wise nor necessary for the believer.
I have found there is a wonderful harmony in the complementary truths of science and faith. The God of the Bible is also the God of the genome. God can be found in the cathedral or in the laboratory. By investigating God's majestic and awesome creation, science can actually be a means of worship.
Klaralven
(7,510 posts)He has a wife who is likely in her early 60s, two daughters and five grandchildren.