Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
38 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Remember Susan McDougal? (Original Post) kpete Oct 2021 OP
Well that was then, this is now..... KS Toronado Oct 2021 #1
More like apples and oranges. jimfields33 Oct 2021 #13
Susan McDougal did not know anything Seinan Sensei Oct 2021 #32
There you go again. Calmly stating the facts. TomSlick Oct 2021 #36
This message was self-deleted by its author sinkingfeeling Oct 2021 #2
Damned if we do, damned if we don't Mr. Ected Oct 2021 #3
Absolutely! Duppers Oct 2021 #6
Sticks and stone may overthrow Rome OldBaldy1701E Oct 2021 #11
They will call us names regardless. Have to enforce the law. lagomorph777 Oct 2021 #17
But how exactly would that work? Texin Oct 2021 #20
They use the DC jail. Grins Oct 2021 #33
i agree. barbtries Oct 2021 #26
Contempt of Congress ... marble falls Oct 2021 #4
What about Lewandowski? Remember he showed up but Laura PourMeADrink Oct 2021 #16
Indeed. All that did was offer a freebie to others who don't want to answer questions. calimary Oct 2021 #23
K & R Duppers Oct 2021 #5
Susan went to jail on a contempt of court charge for refusing sinkingfeeling Oct 2021 #7
Actually WHITT Oct 2021 #30
You are correct. Starr wanted her to say she had an affair with Clinton. louis-t Oct 2021 #31
If they refuse to testify.... SergeStorms Oct 2021 #8
With all due respect, gab13by13 Oct 2021 #9
+1 uponit7771 Oct 2021 #10
That is what is so disturbing about the "patience" argument... kentuck Oct 2021 #21
I doubt they would pay fines themselves. Not a punishment. vanlassie Oct 2021 #12
I heard this morning.... SergeStorms Oct 2021 #15
But of course FG wouldn't. But what he would do would be to beg his Laura PourMeADrink Oct 2021 #19
How 'bout both? Heavy fines AND jail. calimary Oct 2021 #24
If they ignore the subpoenas and are not jailed RVN VET71 Oct 2021 #14
No ankle bracelets, actual prison time, no white collar detention bucolic_frolic Oct 2021 #18
"right to get confidential advice from aides." I thought that largely only applied to lawyers and cstanleytech Oct 2021 #22
Toughen up Democrats! ecstatic Oct 2021 #25
We need a new Chateau D'If to throw these miscreants into... Moostache Oct 2021 #27
Republican/Nazis cad do whatever they want without penalty. johnthewoodworker Oct 2021 #28
Lock Bannon, Meadows and the other idiots up LetMyPeopleVote Oct 2021 #29
She refused to give false testimony against the Clintons Darwin2019 Oct 2021 #34
She refused to give false testimony against the Clintons Darwin2019 Oct 2021 #35
Starr not only wanted her testimony nakocal Oct 2021 #37
Se need to start rigorously enforcing subpoenas. Martin68 Oct 2021 #38

KS Toronado

(17,191 posts)
1. Well that was then, this is now.....
Thu Oct 7, 2021, 08:13 AM
Oct 2021

Besides McDougal was one of "THEM", not one of "US". Different rules for us vs them.
At least that's what reQublicOns believe.

jimfields33

(15,763 posts)
13. More like apples and oranges.
Thu Oct 7, 2021, 08:56 AM
Oct 2021

Both these situations are different. Mcdogal went to jail for federal summons ignoring. Not a house summons.

Seinan Sensei

(361 posts)
32. Susan McDougal did not know anything
Thu Oct 7, 2021, 04:24 PM
Oct 2021

Her husband Jim McDougal knew things
Susan was not a mover/ shaker/ policy-maker
She went to jail mainly because she would not say nasty things about Bill C -- things that Ken Starr wanted her to stay

TomSlick

(11,096 posts)
36. There you go again. Calmly stating the facts.
Thu Oct 7, 2021, 08:31 PM
Oct 2021

McDougal defied a subpoena from a federal grand jury, for which a contempt citation is an easy proposition. A grand jury subpoena is a writ of the court, which the court will be disposed to enforce. Enforcing a congressional subpoena is more complicated and something the courts would prefer to avoid.

Response to kpete (Original post)

Mr. Ected

(9,670 posts)
3. Damned if we do, damned if we don't
Thu Oct 7, 2021, 08:24 AM
Oct 2021

If we ultimately incarcerate these blights on humanity, they will project their own image upon us and call us fascist tyrants.

If we don't incarcerate, they will eventually assume control and throw our key representatives in prison on trumped up charges.

If the second supposition is correct (and I think it is), then I think we have no choice. Either way our goose may be cooked if they take over Congress and the White House. Might as well expose them now for the vermin they are and let the chips fall as they may.

OldBaldy1701E

(5,113 posts)
11. Sticks and stone may overthrow Rome
Thu Oct 7, 2021, 08:52 AM
Oct 2021

But words will never hurt me. Let them scream and yell about fascists all they want. Follow the precedent of law! Defiance means being charged and incarcerated. Tough tickies if they don't like it. Please remember, the only 'fascists' around are the rethugs. Don't let them command the conversation.

Texin

(2,594 posts)
20. But how exactly would that work?
Thu Oct 7, 2021, 09:39 AM
Oct 2021

As far as I know, congressional committees don't (really) have the physical capacity to incarcerate anyone who defies a committee summons. What facility exists in which this might happen?

Don't get me wrong. I believe these chucklehead Molotov bombers to the Constitution need to meet the consequences of their wrong-headed beliefs and their fascist actions to the nth degree. But there is nothing really that can be done with them unless criminal charges are brought against them, and Dems can't do that.

 

Laura PourMeADrink

(42,770 posts)
16. What about Lewandowski? Remember he showed up but
Thu Oct 7, 2021, 09:19 AM
Oct 2021

refused to answer some of the questions. Everyone kept saying that they should hold him in contempt but they didn't. We're going to have to look into the matter. Maybe that was executive privilege claims.

calimary

(81,198 posts)
23. Indeed. All that did was offer a freebie to others who don't want to answer questions.
Thu Oct 7, 2021, 10:06 AM
Oct 2021

Do what he did! Do you see him facing ANY consequences for it? Then? Or now?

You can SAY you went in and sat before the committee. The fact that you SHAT ON the committee just becomes the new how-to! It’s the real-life immunity from any consequences.

Skulduggery for FREE!!!

sinkingfeeling

(51,444 posts)
7. Susan went to jail on a contempt of court charge for refusing
Thu Oct 7, 2021, 08:30 AM
Oct 2021

to answer Grand Jury questions.

Her refusal to answer "three questions" for a grand jury, on whether President Bill Clinton lied in his testimony during her Whitewater trial, led her to receive a jail sentence of 18 months for contempt of court. That made up most of the total 22 months she spent incarcerated.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Susan_McDougal

WHITT

(2,868 posts)
30. Actually
Thu Oct 7, 2021, 01:31 PM
Oct 2021

She went to prison because she refused to tell the grand jury the LIES that Starr was trying to force her to tell.

He belongs in prison.

louis-t

(23,288 posts)
31. You are correct. Starr wanted her to say she had an affair with Clinton.
Thu Oct 7, 2021, 03:45 PM
Oct 2021

She had already testified.

SergeStorms

(19,192 posts)
8. If they refuse to testify....
Thu Oct 7, 2021, 08:32 AM
Oct 2021

then fine them heavily, or put them in jail.

TFGs "executive privilege" is over with. His reign of terror is over with. He doesn't get to tell people what to do anymore. His fat ass belongs in jail.

kentuck

(111,076 posts)
21. That is what is so disturbing about the "patience" argument...
Thu Oct 7, 2021, 09:42 AM
Oct 2021

....and Merrick Garland has it under control. We don't know what we are doing or what we are talking about, etc.

It is becoming more dangerous for our democracy with each passing day.

The Justice System has been corrupted under Bill Barr and I don't know if it can recover?

SergeStorms

(19,192 posts)
15. I heard this morning....
Thu Oct 7, 2021, 09:09 AM
Oct 2021

on MSNBC that they were considering a first offense fine of $100,000. That might get their attention, if they can legally do that. If they don't pay, off to jail with them. No more freaking around.

RVN VET71

(2,690 posts)
14. If they ignore the subpoenas and are not jailed
Thu Oct 7, 2021, 09:02 AM
Oct 2021

the only question worth asking is “why?” If it’s because no action is taken against them because the Dems don’t want to seem overly harsh, we are all likely screwed.

But if the Dems are unable to pursue criminal contempt charges because of some statute ot codicil of law, then the Dems ought to find a way around it, or at least try.

bucolic_frolic

(43,123 posts)
18. No ankle bracelets, actual prison time, no white collar detention
Thu Oct 7, 2021, 09:26 AM
Oct 2021

Actual prison like real citizens serve time in

cstanleytech

(26,280 posts)
22. "right to get confidential advice from aides." I thought that largely only applied to lawyers and
Thu Oct 7, 2021, 09:51 AM
Oct 2021

doctors? Not to mention of course varies intelligence agencies and the military.

ecstatic

(32,681 posts)
25. Toughen up Democrats!
Thu Oct 7, 2021, 10:22 AM
Oct 2021

Like seriously, it's time. The "nice" act is no longer cute or endearing with so much at stake.

Moostache

(9,895 posts)
27. We need a new Chateau D'If to throw these miscreants into...
Thu Oct 7, 2021, 10:52 AM
Oct 2021

Toss them in a hole and drop gruel and drip water down the walls.
Fuck these fools, make them actually see how much Trump would let them endure for nothing.

Charge them as accessories to insurrection, let them plead the 5th and then convict them all.
Or do what democratic leaders seem to always do - go noodle soft and cave to these assholes once more...

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Remember Susan McDougal?