Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Nevilledog

(51,063 posts)
Fri Oct 8, 2021, 01:27 PM Oct 2021

Rittenhouse's lawyers are arguing he was engaging in "legal hunting" on the streets of Kenosha.



Tweet text:
Scott Hechinger
@ScottHech
My god. Kyle Rittenhouse's lawyers are arguing he was engaging in "legal hunting" on the streets of Kenosha. His attorneys should make every good faith argument in service of zealous advocacy. This is neither good faith nor zealous. It's vile & ineffective.

Hunting laws allowed Kyle Rittenhouse to carry weapon, lawyers say
Prosecutor Thomas Binger dismissed the defense argument and said Rittenhouse's attorneys should tell a jury he was "hunting on the streets" in Kenosha.
nbcnews.com
10:11 AM · Oct 8, 2021


https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/hunting-laws-allowed-kyle-rittenhouse-carry-weapon-during-fatal-shootings-n1280950?cid=sm_npd_nn_tw_ma

Attorneys for Kyle Rittenhouse, who is charged with fatally shooting two people during a protest in Wisconsin last year, argued that hunting laws allowed him to carry the assault-style weapon used during the shootings.

Wisconsin law prohibits anyone under age 18 from being armed, but Rittenhouse’s attorneys argued that state laws only forbid minors to carry short-barreled rifles and shotguns. The other prohibitions pertaining to children fall under hunting laws, which say children under age 12 can’t hunt with guns, Rittenhouse’s attorneys said at a hearing Tuesday.

Rittenhouse, of Antioch, Illinois, was 17 on Aug. 25, 2020, when he fatally shot two men and wounded another man while carrying an AR-15-style semiautomatic rifle at a protest prompted by a police shooting of a Black man, prosecutors have said.

“There appears to be an exception for 17-year-olds,” defense attorney Corey Chirafisi said, the Chicago Tribune reported.

Assistant District Attorney Thomas Binger responded that if the defense wants to tell a jury that Rittenhouse was only hunting, it should do so.

*snip*


44 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Rittenhouse's lawyers are arguing he was engaging in "legal hunting" on the streets of Kenosha. (Original Post) Nevilledog Oct 2021 OP
Sure. BlueJac Oct 2021 #1
Word in statutes are whatever they are defined to be Effete Snob Oct 2021 #2
Does he need a license to hunt in Wisconsin? If so, did he have one? Jim__ Oct 2021 #3
What was he hunting? Retired Engineer Bob Oct 2021 #39
This message was self-deleted by its author sl8 Oct 2021 #40
And what exactly was he hunting on city streets? Vinca Oct 2021 #4
animals Skittles Oct 2021 #42
I'm pretty sure most states don't allow "hunting" at night. yonder Oct 2021 #5
And then the authorities came hunting for Kyle. Sneederbunk Oct 2021 #6
Prosecutor: "Hey! That's our theory! Get your own!" Iggo Oct 2021 #7
Yeah, I'm sure lil ole Lars39 Oct 2021 #8
The framing of this is that it maybe technically correct but a bad look unblock Oct 2021 #9
Recommended. H2O Man Oct 2021 #10
+1 ProfessorGAC Oct 2021 #43
What hunting season is open at night in August jpak Oct 2021 #11
I'm sure he would gladly pay the fines for those offenses if the defense works. Cuthbert Allgood Oct 2021 #13
That was the first thing I thought of - does he have a WI license? underpants Oct 2021 #26
This message was self-deleted by its author sl8 Oct 2021 #28
The lawyers are just trying to confuse the jury sdfernando Oct 2021 #12
And I'm pretty sure WI has magazine limits on hunting rifles jpak Oct 2021 #14
Those people were "dear" to someone. ret5hd Oct 2021 #25
If he gets away with this, we'll see another entitled George Zimmerman on the streets. Baitball Blogger Oct 2021 #19
Isn't the season for legally hunting humans only one day long? localroger Oct 2021 #15
The death rate in America would improve if we could collapse all the murders into one day. Baitball Blogger Oct 2021 #18
You have to get a special license for human hunting. nt leftyladyfrommo Oct 2021 #30
"legal hunting?" insanity! nt orleans Oct 2021 #16
Like, in an open season for Liberals? Baitball Blogger Oct 2021 #17
I don't know of any state that allows hunting people. LiberalFighter Oct 2021 #20
Reminds me of "The Most Dangerous Game" nuxvomica Oct 2021 #21
Yup, General Zaroff. Lars39 Oct 2021 #34
Not a completely accurate representation according to the article. femmedem Oct 2021 #22
I wish I could say I was shocked. GoCubsGo Oct 2021 #23
Wisconsin Act 71 allows urban hunting... jmowreader Oct 2021 #24
So his lawyers want the charges increased? sarisataka Oct 2021 #27
This message was self-deleted by its author sl8 Oct 2021 #29
Inaccurate inference rather than logical conclusion. LanternWaste Oct 2021 #37
So it was human hunting season? WTF are they talking about? spanone Oct 2021 #31
Hunting liberals with an assault weapon. milestogo Oct 2021 #32
Hunting humans is legal? Who the fuck knew! madinmaryland Oct 2021 #33
Legal hunting in the midwest is just like "legitimate rape." DFW Oct 2021 #36
Hey Ricky Schroeder RANDYWILDMAN Oct 2021 #35
I think putting the term "hunting" in a juror's mind when the offense is cold-blooded murder Mr. Ected Oct 2021 #38
What was he hunting in the city that required such a weapon? keithbvadu2 Oct 2021 #41
what is the relevence of that? Takket Oct 2021 #44
 

Effete Snob

(8,387 posts)
2. Word in statutes are whatever they are defined to be
Fri Oct 8, 2021, 01:33 PM
Oct 2021

If, in Wisconsin, (a) "hunting" is legal and if (b) "hunting" is defined as "walking around with a gun", then you end up with things like this.

They are not arguing that it is legal to hunt people. They are arguing that he wasn't committing some other offense up to the point of shooting people, which might have an impact on the degree of criminal homicide with which he is charged.

Or, to put it simply, if "walking around with a gun" is otherwise an offense, and if he killed someone in the process of already committing an offense, then, in some states, that kind of thing can bump a lower level of criminal homicide up to a relatively high one.

But if "walking around with a gun" is otherwise legal "hunting" in Wisconsin, then you end up with arguments that, yeah, sound bizarre in the context of just what he was up to that night.

Jim__

(14,074 posts)
3. Does he need a license to hunt in Wisconsin? If so, did he have one?
Fri Oct 8, 2021, 01:33 PM
Oct 2021

IIRC, he got the gun specifically to take it to the protest. What was he hunting?

Response to Jim__ (Reply #3)

unblock

(52,182 posts)
9. The framing of this is that it maybe technically correct but a bad look
Fri Oct 8, 2021, 01:42 PM
Oct 2021

My problem with this is that my impression is that it's not just a bad look; I think hunting humans is exactly what he intended to do and exactly what he did.

H2O Man

(73,528 posts)
10. Recommended.
Fri Oct 8, 2021, 01:50 PM
Oct 2021

I recently watched film of one of the pre-trial hearings. The defense has an "expert witness" who seeks to testify that Rittenhouse was justified in killing his victim. What I found most important is that this fellow "trains" people -- from military to law enforcement to militias -- on "self defense." The significance is extreme.

jpak

(41,757 posts)
11. What hunting season is open at night in August
Fri Oct 8, 2021, 01:55 PM
Oct 2021

In Wisconsin.

Also did have WI hunting license?

His lawyers are morans

Yup

underpants

(182,736 posts)
26. That was the first thing I thought of - does he have a WI license?
Fri Oct 8, 2021, 02:49 PM
Oct 2021

Out of state licenses can be expensive.

I guess getting him on a hunting violation is their goal. Seems almost insulting to the court.

Response to jpak (Reply #11)

sdfernando

(4,929 posts)
12. The lawyers are just trying to confuse the jury
Fri Oct 8, 2021, 02:01 PM
Oct 2021

that murderous kid knew he couldn't buy that gun legally so he had a friend buy it for him...straw purchase...illegal gun. He even predicated life behind bars after his murderous rampage. I'm all for that!

I don't know what the laws are there but I'm sure you still cannot go "hunting" with an illegal gun.

jpak

(41,757 posts)
14. And I'm pretty sure WI has magazine limits on hunting rifles
Fri Oct 8, 2021, 02:06 PM
Oct 2021

A 30 round magazine is illegal in most if not all states

On edit you can use a 30 round magazine to hunt deer on WI

Yikes

localroger

(3,625 posts)
15. Isn't the season for legally hunting humans only one day long?
Fri Oct 8, 2021, 02:10 PM
Oct 2021

I seem to remember that from some documentary called The Purge.

Baitball Blogger

(46,698 posts)
18. The death rate in America would improve if we could collapse all the murders into one day.
Fri Oct 8, 2021, 02:12 PM
Oct 2021

At least our school kids and innocent bystanders would have a chance -- assuming home invasions were forbidden.

nuxvomica

(12,419 posts)
21. Reminds me of "The Most Dangerous Game"
Fri Oct 8, 2021, 02:22 PM
Oct 2021

In that story, the villain was hunting people so if they want to portray their client as the villain maybe it's a Hail-Mary attempt to establish grounds for appeal based on incompetence of counsel.

femmedem

(8,201 posts)
22. Not a completely accurate representation according to the article.
Fri Oct 8, 2021, 02:24 PM
Oct 2021

Yes, his attorney is arguing that the illegal weapons charge should be dismissed because hunting laws allow him to carry.

But it was the prosecutors who pointed out the ridiculousness of that argument by pointing out what it really means.

Assistant District Attorney Thomas Binger responded that if the defense wants to tell a jury that Rittenhouse was only hunting, it should do so.

“They can submit evidence that the defendant had a certificate to hunt and he was engaged in legal hunting on the streets of Kenosha that night,” Binger said, according to the newspaper.

GoCubsGo

(32,078 posts)
23. I wish I could say I was shocked.
Fri Oct 8, 2021, 02:27 PM
Oct 2021

But, very little shocks me at this point, this included. Sadly, it won't shock me if the jury buys this bullshit, too.

jmowreader

(50,552 posts)
24. Wisconsin Act 71 allows urban hunting...
Fri Oct 8, 2021, 02:28 PM
Oct 2021

...but the only legal weapons are bows and crossbows.

I can see ADA Binger's thoughts on this: Rittenhouse has exactly zero defense on this one. He was underage, he came in from out of state, he was carrying an illegally purchased gun AND he killed two people. So if the defense wants to completely destroy itself by claiming Rittenhouse was just a hunter, he's going to let them go for it.

sarisataka

(18,570 posts)
27. So his lawyers want the charges increased?
Fri Oct 8, 2021, 03:01 PM
Oct 2021

Because if he was "hunting" with a gun, the goal is to shoot and kill whatever you are hunting. Since he was there 'to protect property' the particular varmint that would cause damage was homo sapiens.

Therefore the logical conclusion is that he was there to hunt people which in legalese is termed premeditated murder.

Response to sarisataka (Reply #27)

DFW

(54,330 posts)
36. Legal hunting in the midwest is just like "legitimate rape."
Fri Oct 8, 2021, 04:56 PM
Oct 2021

They saw that old Western spoof from 1967, where rape was justified as "assault with a friendly weapon."

Republicans are very creative when excusing felonies committed by Republicans.

RANDYWILDMAN

(2,667 posts)
35. Hey Ricky Schroeder
Fri Oct 8, 2021, 04:26 PM
Oct 2021

You paid for this idiot to walk free the last few months and his defense is basically that he is a white free man and has every right to defend himself from scary brown people.....fuck you, you fucking fucks !

Mr. Ected

(9,670 posts)
38. I think putting the term "hunting" in a juror's mind when the offense is cold-blooded murder
Fri Oct 8, 2021, 05:01 PM
Oct 2021

Might not be the most effective argument to use.

Therefore, I hope they persist in using it.

keithbvadu2

(36,738 posts)
41. What was he hunting in the city that required such a weapon?
Fri Oct 8, 2021, 07:21 PM
Oct 2021

What was he hunting in the city that required such a weapon?

Bears? Boars? Wolves? Mountain lions?

Takket

(21,552 posts)
44. what is the relevence of that?
Fri Oct 8, 2021, 08:27 PM
Oct 2021

if you use a gun to murder someone why does it matter if you were allowed to carry it or not? the moment you kill someone a crime has been committed.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Rittenhouse's lawyers are...