Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

The Straight Story

(48,121 posts)
Thu Jan 12, 2012, 03:27 PM Jan 2012

Anti-Abortion Protester Can't Dismiss Charges

Anti-Abortion Protester Can't Dismiss Charges


WASHINGTON (CN) - A federal judge has refused to dismiss charges against an anti-abortion protester who allegedly made a Planned Parenthood patient "visibly upset" with statements like, "Don't let them kill your baby."

Richard Retta is charged with violating the Freedom of Access to Clinic Entrances (FACE) Act, a law prohibiting the use of intimidation or obstruction to interfere with people trying to get an abortion.

Retta, whom the Justice Department calls a "regular anti-abortion protestor at the Planned Parenthood in Metropolitan, Washington," is accused of physically obstructing a patient from entering the clinic in January 2011.

The patient managed to access the clinic only because of the "extraordinary assistance" of clinic escorts and staff, according to the complaint.
Retta allegedly confronted the woman outside the clinic, and two escorts came to her aid when she became "visibly upset." Prosecutors say Retta walked alongside the woman the entire length of the 35-foot walkway, shouting at the escorts. At one point, he positioned himself directly in front of the patient and yelled, "Don't go in there. Don't let them kill your baby," the complaint states.

http://www.courthousenews.com/2012/01/12/42997.htm

7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Anti-Abortion Protester Can't Dismiss Charges (Original Post) The Straight Story Jan 2012 OP
send him to gitmo dembotoz Jan 2012 #1
Hope he goes to jail. Why do these people mind everybody elses business but their own. southernyankeebelle Jan 2012 #2
Did he do anything more than speak and protest? ddeclue Jan 2012 #4
There are restraining orders in place... Javaman Jan 2012 #5
I only know what is in the post. ddeclue Jan 2012 #6
He had to right to block her way to get into the business. It is her right. He tried to block her southernyankeebelle Jan 2012 #7
Good for the DOJ! A good prosecution. nt msanthrope Jan 2012 #3
 

ddeclue

(16,733 posts)
4. Did he do anything more than speak and protest?
Thu Jan 12, 2012, 05:27 PM
Jan 2012

If he's blowing up clinics or shooting doctors then fine prosecute him but you can't arrest people for protesting and exercising free speech rights. This law will be overturned by the Supreme Court for violating the First Amendment.

You can't complain about Occupy protestors being shut down and then pretend it is OK to shut down the other side this way.

"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances."

Javaman

(62,517 posts)
5. There are restraining orders in place...
Thu Jan 12, 2012, 05:35 PM
Jan 2012

they can protest all they want but they must maintain a required distance from the clinic.

violation of said restraining order is against the law.

I know you know all of this, right?

 

ddeclue

(16,733 posts)
6. I only know what is in the post.
Thu Jan 12, 2012, 05:40 PM
Jan 2012

The restraining orders themselves may be unconstitutional depending on the distance specified.

If it says they must remain 100 feet from the door that is very likely constitutional.

If it says they must remain 1000 feet from the door, probably not constitutional.

What distance is specified in the restraining order and on what grounds was it issued?

 

southernyankeebelle

(11,304 posts)
7. He had to right to block her way to get into the business. It is her right. He tried to block her
Thu Jan 12, 2012, 05:51 PM
Jan 2012

What grievances does he have on someones personal business. He doesn't know the lady. They said he is constantly there bothering people. Do you think it's his right? You are saying if a person doesn't like what they are doing they have a right to stop them even if they don't know that person. Here is an example:

The McDonald's business sells really fattening foods. A very heavy person tries to go in. Yet the person comes out from no where and said you can't go in there because it is bad for your health. He steps in front of the person scream at the person saying your to fat and you should stay out of there. Finally the person gets right in front of the customer blocks the door screaming at the person over and over. So you think that is OK? Don't carry on about McDonalds. I love McDonald's burgers. Just giving an example.

Just because he doesn't like what the lady is doing he has no right to stop her by blocking her entrance. Because the next time he might just pull out his gun. Just like a lot of those wackos that already have killed doctors for doing their jobs.

I just wish the holy rollers would stay out of the bedroom. I personally don't believe in abortion for me. It isn't my or anyone else place to tell others. Men don't rule a woman's body. If that was the case I would say that men who produce more than one child out of wedlock should be forced to have a vasectomy. When I tell that to my male friends who are against abortions they just get tongue tied. I stop them just with that comment. If you tell a women what to do then it works the other way around.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Anti-Abortion Protester C...