General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsStudents sue Texas school district for banning long hair on boys
Seven students are suing a Texas school district over its dress-code policy banning boys from having long hair.
According to the suit, school officials suspended a 9-year-old boy for a month, barred him from recess and normal lunch breaks as punishment for long hair.
He and the other students, aged 7 to 17, say the policy violates the constitution and Title IX - a federal law prohibiting sex discrimination.
The school district said on Thursday it was reviewing the suit.
Magnolia Independent School District "respects varying viewpoints, and we respect the rights of citizens to advocate for change," spokeswoman Denise Meyers said in an email to US media.
The district, which serves roughly 13,000 students about 40 miles (64km) northwest of Houston, did not return a request for comment from the BBC.
According to its dress code policy, boys cannot wear their hair over their eyes, past the bottom of their ears, or past the bottom of a dress shirt collar. Facing backlash this summer, Magnolia defended the policy, saying it "reflects the values of our community at large".
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-59013608
__________________________________________________________
This again? Texass.......
Wingus Dingus
(8,052 posts)Probatim
(2,513 posts)Next up - Unicorn Leash Laws.
Mad_Machine76
(24,399 posts)Dystopia for everybody else.
underpants
(182,720 posts)Long haired freaky people need not apply
Irish_Dem
(46,771 posts)Many decades ago.
IL Dem
(813 posts)n/t
underpants
(182,720 posts)malaise
(268,844 posts)Rec
ripcord
(5,311 posts)I thought maybe it was Muskogee Oklahoma.
Mysterian
(4,574 posts)but we have a highly activist right-wing Supreme Court that seeks only to further the fascist agenda of the republican party.
GregariousGroundhog
(7,516 posts)I presume arguments in this case will probably mirror those in Bostock v. Clayton. If that's the case, then Roberts, Breyer, Sotomayor, Kagan, and Gorsuch would probably vote in favor of the students while Thomas, Alito, and Kavanaugh would vote in favor of the school district.
Ginsburg voted in favor of Bostock, but given that Barret clerked for Scalia, I imagine she would join Thomas/Alito/Kavanaugh in dissent.
NickB79
(19,233 posts)jcgoldie
(11,623 posts)Want to experience the 1950s? Just plan a trip to Texas!
Response to Jilly_in_VA (Original post)
ExTex This message was self-deleted by its author.
Mad_Machine76
(24,399 posts)Response to Mad_Machine76 (Reply #15)
ExTex This message was self-deleted by its author.
gratuitous
(82,849 posts)But since the policy is in total alignment with the values of the community at large, none of the citizens will mind that the District is setting a big pile of money on fire to lose a court case.