Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

steve2470

(37,457 posts)
Fri Oct 22, 2021, 04:40 PM Oct 2021

Texas GOP: Marriage equality not valid in Texas, despite Obergefell v. Hodges

Marriage equality is the law of the land — except in Texas, argues the state GOP.

Legislative leaders in TX issued an opinion stating legalized gay marriage shouldn’t be permitted in the Lone Star State because they feel state law trumps the SCOTUS ruling in Obergefell v Hodges.





https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Obergefell_v._Hodges

Obergefell v. Hodges, 576 U.S. 644 (2015) (/ˈoʊbərɡəfɛl/ OH-bər-gə-fel), is a landmark civil rights case in which the Supreme Court of the United States ruled that the fundamental right to marry is guaranteed to same-sex couples by both the Due Process Clause and the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution. The 5–4 ruling requires all fifty states, the District of Columbia, and the Insular Areas to perform and recognize the marriages of same-sex couples on the same terms and conditions as the marriages of opposite-sex couples, with all the accompanying rights and responsibilities.[2][3]
15 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Texas GOP: Marriage equality not valid in Texas, despite Obergefell v. Hodges (Original Post) steve2470 Oct 2021 OP
More nullification bullshit. Aristus Oct 2021 #1
We have a statue to donate to them SCantiGOP Oct 2021 #4
"extra shipping and handling charge" leftieNanner Oct 2021 #7
... and there it is. FalloutShelter Oct 2021 #2
Okay, you lost this fight in 1865 and ever since gratuitous Oct 2021 #3
"...state law 'trumps' the SCOTUS..." dchill Oct 2021 #5
Darn that pesky 14th Amendment. Caliman73 Oct 2021 #6
GQP politicians has a neanderthal death wish for human decency gohuskies Oct 2021 #8
I think this is a deliberate attempt to get anyone they don't like..that is anyone who isn't PortTack Oct 2021 #9
Truly, they're chin deep in psychosis. Duncan Grant Oct 2021 #10
Demented fucks Solly Mack Oct 2021 #11
If texas wants to return to the 1700's, let them all surrender their pc's and cell phones, and TV's. lindysalsagal Oct 2021 #12
maybe they should read the Constitution they claim to love Takket Oct 2021 #13
And Republicans sink lower and lower... sakabatou Oct 2021 #14
Just like Jim Crow segregation trumps Brown vs Board Of Education. East-A-Squared Oct 2021 #15

SCantiGOP

(13,862 posts)
4. We have a statue to donate to them
Fri Oct 22, 2021, 04:47 PM
Oct 2021

A couple of months ago, Charleston SC took down the iconic statue of John C Calhoun, the architect and principle creator of the doctrine of Nullification, from a downtown park named - what else - Calhoun Park.
They can have it and the Confederate flag we took of the Statehouse dome 6 years ago.
AND IF THEY ACT NOW, we'll throw in Lindsey Graham and the corpse of Strom Thurmond for just an extra shipping and handling charge.


gratuitous

(82,849 posts)
3. Okay, you lost this fight in 1865 and ever since
Fri Oct 22, 2021, 04:42 PM
Oct 2021

But you want to lose again, that's fine with us. When we get done this time, though, we're changing your name to the One Star State.

Dipshits.

dchill

(38,437 posts)
5. "...state law 'trumps' the SCOTUS..."
Fri Oct 22, 2021, 04:49 PM
Oct 2021

Take THAT, SCOTUS. "States' rights" bite everybody in the ass, sooner or later.

Caliman73

(11,725 posts)
6. Darn that pesky 14th Amendment.
Fri Oct 22, 2021, 04:50 PM
Oct 2021

You have no standing foolish Texas Republicans... While states remain semi-autonomous in how they administer law in their respective jurisdiction. They are bound to follow the law granting "The People" the most protection. Obergefell set the precedent that the LEGAL union of marriage is a right of consenting adults regardless of sexual orientation. That is the law of the land (UNITED STATES) meaning all of the states. You cannot make laws or retain laws that strip equal protection from people. You may think that State Law carries more weight, but not in this case.

Sorry, but you aren't going away empty handed, you will be taking with you, a 3 month supply of Rice-a-Roni, the San Francisco Treat!

gohuskies

(1,154 posts)
8. GQP politicians has a neanderthal death wish for human decency
Fri Oct 22, 2021, 05:01 PM
Oct 2021

Turning back the clock to stone age morality is just one of their wet dreams.

PortTack

(32,704 posts)
9. I think this is a deliberate attempt to get anyone they don't like..that is anyone who isn't
Fri Oct 22, 2021, 05:44 PM
Oct 2021

White, straight, racist, macho pig, white Karen to just leave the state

Duncan Grant

(8,259 posts)
10. Truly, they're chin deep in psychosis.
Fri Oct 22, 2021, 05:58 PM
Oct 2021

Today’s conservatism is a fanatical movement. Let’s count the days until more red states jump on the bandwagon.

This sort of regressive legislative energy leads to tragedy. That’s about as calmly as I can say it. Let history guide your own hypotheticals regarding our direction as a country.

lindysalsagal

(20,581 posts)
12. If texas wants to return to the 1700's, let them all surrender their pc's and cell phones, and TV's.
Fri Oct 22, 2021, 06:08 PM
Oct 2021

Otherwise, damn.

Takket

(21,528 posts)
13. maybe they should read the Constitution they claim to love
Fri Oct 22, 2021, 06:14 PM
Oct 2021
https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/supremacy_clause

Supremacy Clause
Primary tabs
See Preemption; constitutional clauses.

Article VI, Paragraph 2 of the U.S. Constitution is commonly referred to as the Supremacy Clause. It establishes that the federal constitution, and federal law generally, take precedence over state laws, and even state constitutions. It prohibits states from interfering with the federal government's exercise of its constitutional powers, and from assuming any functions that are exclusively entrusted to the federal government. It does not, however, allow the federal government to review or veto state laws before they take effect.
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Texas GOP: Marriage equal...