General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsMaxwell Verdict In Trouble?
As I predicted this morning, the guilty verdict is in trouble because of a juror's interview with Reuters. In short, he made it seem like he lied about his own past sexual abuse and compelled reluctant jurors to convict based on his own past abuse.
Assistant US attorney, Maureen Comey (hmmm?) is cited in the article and said they are investigating a potential serious issue with the juror.
I smell a bribed juror.
https://nordot.app/851562705546625024?c=592622757532812385
New York Daily News Article above.
Original Article (Reuters)
Fullduplexxx
(7,851 posts)RandPaulsNeighbor
(104 posts)It all smells to me. Everything around this case is corruption, deception, and endless chances for the criminals involved.
PTWB
(4,131 posts)RandPaulsNeighbor
(104 posts)But, Epstein and company keep finding magical parachutes.
A few guesses: trump, Andrews, Bannon, Melania, Dersh.... The list of interested power players is endless.
Kaleva
(36,291 posts)RandPaulsNeighbor
(104 posts)But, that would be much harder, even for these guys.
He may have just lied out of shame, but, why do the interview and admit it. No one else was looking.
Everything in this case is on the table.
elleng
(130,834 posts)BlueIdaho
(13,582 posts)No doubt in my mind she would be tried and convicted again if necessary.
UTUSN
(70,671 posts)Calista241
(5,586 posts)The gov't can always try her again, and certainly would in this case. Bribing a juror doesn't make sense.
RandPaulsNeighbor
(104 posts)cinematicdiversions
(1,969 posts)RandPaulsNeighbor
(104 posts)Nothing would surprise me here.
Beaverhausen
(24,470 posts)Do jurors have to have no life experience to make judgements from?
Honestly, good luck finding 12 people who were not abused.
Kaleva
(36,291 posts)RandPaulsNeighbor
(104 posts)This is a standard question in this type of voir dire and you cannot lie. The next question is can you still sit in this jury or will you be too biased.