General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsBJay Pak is an old school Republican
He finds out there's a coup being planned to overturn an election and install a fellow Republican into the White House illegally... and that he personally could stand in the way of the plot against the Republic.
What's he do? Washes his hands, quits without an explanation, and gets out of the coup's way. He won't get his hands dirty, which covers his ass, but fails his oath to uphold and protect the Constitution.
You know that quote about what it takes for evil to prevail in the world is good men doing nothing? BJay Pak is that good man.
crickets
(25,952 posts)I have no love for Republicans, even the supposedly 'good' ones, but what has BJay Pak done to bring up his name now? He had a choice to quit or be fired. He chose to quit before tfg had a chance to have him removed. Because he was unwilling to cooperate with any wrongdoing, there was no way he was going to be allowed to stay and do ...anything.
https://lawandcrime.com/2020-election/former-u-s-attorney-in-georgia-told-senate-he-resigned-because-trump-would-have-fired-him-for-not-backing-fraud-claims-report/
The report, attributed to a person familiar with closed-door testimony before the Senate Judiciary Committee, corroborates what most court-watchers suspected following Byung BJay Paks sudden departure from helming the U.S. Attorneys office for the Atlanta-based Southern District of Georgia in January.
The 45th president appeared to refer to Pak as a never-Trumper in a taped phone call on Jan. 2 this year, urging Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger (R) to find 11,780 votes. [snip]
Emails released by the House in June* also hinted at White House pressure bearing down upon Pak during the final days of his tenure.
*https://talkingpointsmemo.com/news/bjay-pak-doj-emails-house-departure
Later, Pak voluntarily appeared before the Senate Judiciary Committee.
https://apnews.com/article/joe-biden-election-2020-f256ba4917d47e9728d216b014edfae9
The interview was with Byung J. BJay Pak, who resigned as a U.S. attorney in Atlanta the day after a call between Trump and Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger became public, according to a person familiar with the committee meeting.
In a recording of the call between Trump and Raffensperger, obtained the day after by The Associated Press and other outlets, Trump is heard urging Raffensperger to find enough votes to overturn Joe Bidens win in the state. He also appeared to criticize Pak, whom he had appointed, indicating Pak hadnt done enough to try and overturn the election. Trump called Pak a never Trumper.
Democratic Sen. Richard Blumenthal of Connecticut, who sits on the Judiciary Committee, said after Wednesdays interview that Pak answered all questions in a seemingly honest and candid way, and my impression is that he believes in the rule of law and that he stood up for it. Blumenthal did not provide details of the conversation.
Any and all information regarding his role at the time and what happened during/after the election was freely given:
https://www.judiciary.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/Pak%20Transcript.pdf
edit to add: I vividly remember when this happened. I live in GA and was righteously pissed that tfg was going so far as to muscle state attorneys out of his way to mess with GA's votes. Again, not a big fan of Republicans in general, but Pak was a guy that tfg installed and he still didn't bend. It backfired on tfg, who thought he'd installed a toady. Pak quit rather than be coerced into committing crimes, and he quit rather than stick around long enough to give tfg the satisfaction of firing him. Not to jump down your throat or anything, but I don't understand what else you think he could have done.
Bucky
(53,936 posts)(I don't think you're jumping down my throat. I think you're criticizing my ideas. That's what we're supposed to do)
When Pak was canned, I remember going "uh-oh" and thinking something was afoot. I didn't know anything. I figured any enemy of Trump is a friend of democracy. We knew his endgame, if not his plans.
He had a choice to quit and walk away quietly, not rocking the boat when it's clear he had full knowledge of Trump's team's intentions to steal Georgia's electoral votes, or to call out what was clearly illegal actions. As the leading federal law enforcement officer in Atlanta he knew what was going on. He walked away quietly
What Pak did was "refuse to gin up" a bogus investigation of the Georgia vote. Good. He didn't help rob the bank.
But he didn't call the cops knowing that the crime was in progress. He allowed himself to be replaced. He didn't make them fire him. He made it easy for them. He didn't blow the whistle. When the robbers entered the bank, he's the guard who didn't draw his gun. He simply skedaddled.
Knowing that the crime was going to take place, he stepped aside quietly and warned no one. Forced to choose between standing up for the Constitution and shielding his reputation from reprisal, he picked his career over his country. Yes, he testified when asked to. He was quiet until August, 8 months after the coup attempt. But he's a lawyer, not a liar. That's not setting the bar an inch off the ground. That's just him still protecting his career first when he had a sworn duty to defend the Constitution.
crickets
(25,952 posts)From what I recall of the time it seemed pretty clear what was going on, so I don't know that I agree with you entirely - but you have given me a different perspective and some food for thought. Thank you.