General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsLetting Non-Citizens Vote Is Terrible Politics
I agree; I've already heard from the peanut gallery that this is cray-cray.
https://politicalwire.com/2022/01/10/letting-non-citizens-vote-is-terrible-politics/
Letting Non-Citizens Vote Is Terrible Politics
January 10, 2022 at 9:44 am EST By Taegan Goddard
Its a lead-pipe cinch that this will become a major campaign talking point for Republicans. They will depict this as proof that Democrats only favor immigration because they want to pad the number of Democratic voters (leaving aside that Hispanic voters have been trending toward the Republicans in recent elections). And they will likely find that most Americans agree This is an own goal for Democrats.
Binkie The Clown
(7,911 posts)FalloutShelter
(11,849 posts)It does cheapen the notion of citizenship.
WhiskeyGrinder
(22,326 posts)Jedi Guy
(3,185 posts)Logically, if non-citizens should be able to vote in local elections because they live in that city, shouldn't they also be able to vote in national/federal elections? After all, they do live in the country. I recognize there are federal laws barring non-citizens from voting in federal elections, but the line drawn seems somewhat arbitrary based on the justification for voting in local elections.
It's a pretty small step from one to the other, and making the argument that non-citizens should be able to vote in national/federal elections is not going to play well.
Achilleaze
(15,543 posts)Dumb move.
Mad_Machine76
(24,406 posts)Or elsewhere? And why should we care? States and cities can do what they want, right? They can let COVID run amok in their cities and states and letting non-citizens vote in NYC and we are the ones in trouble?!
Effete Snob
(8,387 posts)How do you feel about people who neither live OR vote in NYC telling them what their policies should be?
rampartc
(5,403 posts)the repubs will flail us with this one.
DeeNice
(575 posts)WhiskeyGrinder
(22,326 posts)generally quiet about it until now.
Effete Snob
(8,387 posts)Other than a remarkable swell of nativism at DU, the general idea is that there are a lot of people who are on the path to citizenship or otherwise lawfully resident non-citizens in cities whose policies affect them.
The funny thing to me is how people on DU who don't live in NYC seem to think they should have a say in what NYC does.
Sometimes the hypocrisy is impressive.
CrispyQ
(36,457 posts)shouldn't you have the right to vote on issues & candidates in those jurisdictions? Wouldn't that be taxation without representation? If people don't like this law, let's write one that states if you aren't allowed to vote, for whatever reason, then you don't have to pay any taxes.
Progressive Jones
(6,011 posts)As you say, they are part of the community.
I also like your no vote-no taxes idea.
PBC_Democrat
(401 posts)Last edited Mon Jan 10, 2022, 05:52 PM - Edit history (1)
For many years I lived in NH and worked in Mass
MA hit me for state and local payroll taxes. I didn't get a say in local or state spending and policies.
That's Tax without Rep is its purist form
Dr. Strange
(25,919 posts)Conversely, if they don't get to vote, are they exempted from paying taxes when they buy stuff?
CrispyQ
(36,457 posts)Then you could ask, should the ten-year-old have to pay taxes? So yeah, where do you draw the line on taxes vs voting? IDK. But if you are a homeowner or business owner, it seems you should be eligible to vote for issues & candidates that affect your home or business. OTOH, I can see the argument that if you care so much about government, then become part of the nation.
In the end, there won't be a national discussion about the issue. Babylonsister was right. The right wing media is going to bludgeon us on this issue. Just like defund the police.
WhiskeyGrinder
(22,326 posts)babylonsister
(171,056 posts)we're going to get bludgeoned with this.
WhiskeyGrinder
(22,326 posts)CrispyQ
(36,457 posts)And partly because we don't do marketing. People will think that non-citizens are voting for congress & president, not mayor of the town they live in, or on issues that affect them locally. And our side will be like crickets. Just like we were with defund the police & tax & spend democrats & the list goes on & on.
jcgoldie
(11,631 posts)...about all the things Democrats shouldn't do or say because they will be criticized for it by Republicans. If only we just acted more like Republicans maybe those guys would be nice to us I guess...
Iris
(15,652 posts)NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)... IMHO.
empedocles
(15,751 posts)WhiskeyGrinder
(22,326 posts)dalton99a
(81,450 posts)But yeah, noncitizen voting in SF/NYC will be fully exploited by Republicans
Klaralven
(7,510 posts)https://gothamist.com/news/new-york-city-voter-turnout-hits-record-low-mayoral-election
The addition of 800,000 new voters, many of them Hispanic and Asian, should help revitalize a lackadaisical electorate.
Jedi Guy
(3,185 posts)If you live in a city, you should have some voice in how that city is governed. Local/municipal elections for various positions are probably going to have a more immediate impact on one's life, so I get why residents would want to have that influence on how things are going.
On the flipside, it's a horrible look from a polling perspective and is handing the GOP a major talking point. Not only that, but where does it end? Logically speaking, if you should have a voice in your city's governance because you live there, should you not also have a voice in your country's governance? You do live there, after all.
It's kind of a mess.
dalton99a
(81,450 posts)The big November elections have federal/state/local issues listed on one ballot
How are they going to prevent a noncitizen voting on a local candidate/local initiative from making a federal selection?
empedocles
(15,751 posts)Mad_Machine76
(24,406 posts)JCMach1
(27,556 posts)To have citizenship rights in those countries, or the right to vote.
Part of the civic process in this country is becoming a citizen if you aren't one... That's the first step of political integration.
dalton99a
(81,450 posts)The few European countries that allow it limit it to EU nationals who meet certain requirements
Ms. Toad
(34,060 posts)The laws adopted locally (and local elected officials) often have a much more direct impact on the lives of individuals in the community than federal laws and elected officials. We have sizeable and identifiable immigrant communities who are in this country after leaping through all of the formal hoops. These residents are often visibly and ethnically different from the majority, sometimes in ways looked down on by the majority. As a concrete example the majority who, deliberately or out of ignorance, might use zoning laws to prohibit businesses serving these immigrant communities from being located within those communities
We need to learn how to message more effectively, rather than rejecting an appropriate decision to allow non-citizen residents to have a say in the laws and elected officials which most direclty impact them because it looks bad. Historically, blacks and women were told we needed to "wait our turn" because advancing our rights would lose elections for our side. Trans individuals are being told that now. We need to stop sacrificing our values to appease the Republican messaging gods.
brooklynite
(94,501 posts)Sort of like the distinction between socialism and DEMOCRATIC socialism.
People won't notice the difference.
JCMach1
(27,556 posts)Of citizenship to participate.
We don't need further balkanization governed by very narrow interests when there may, or may not be a commitment to this country's values and may very well be based some disparate, or even non-democratic (Theocratic, hell lots of non-sense) basis.
Even worse, it ignores the elephant in the room: a very needed discussion/reckoning about paths to citizenship.
So, that's a big no.
Ms. Toad
(34,060 posts)So I guess we should just go back to only white men voting, since no one else is pure enough.
JCMach1
(27,556 posts)Progress on paths to citizenship which is the real issue.
Emile
(22,664 posts)be my guess!
dalton99a
(81,450 posts)"Democrats Demand Voting Rights for Illegal Immigrants"
Emile
(22,664 posts)babylonsister
(171,056 posts)New York City Mayor Eric Adams allows noncitizen voting bill to become law
Emile
(22,664 posts)By god I sure as hell don't see this as doing the Democratic party any favor!
Polybius
(15,381 posts)It's filled with many who are way out there.
brooklynite
(94,501 posts)Mad_Machine76
(24,406 posts)And why she shouldnt be considered a friend of DU?