Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

634-5789

(4,175 posts)
Mon Jan 10, 2022, 07:27 PM Jan 2022

Challenge filed against Cawthorn's candidacy for reelection under 14th Amendment clause

Nonprofit organization Free Speech for People, a "nonpartisan, non-profit legal advocacy organization with constitutional law expertise," which is serving as lead counsel in the matter, announced on Monday that the challenge was filed before the North Carolina State Board of Elections.

The challenge "alleges that Cawthorn is constitutionally disqualified from public office under the Fourteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution based on reasonable suspicion that he helped facilitate the January 6, 2021 insurrection," the nonprofit described in its press release.

https://wlos.com/news/local/madison-cawthorn-14th-amendment-disqualification-clause-legal-challenge-free-speech-for-people-north-carolina-district-13

7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Challenge filed against Cawthorn's candidacy for reelection under 14th Amendment clause (Original Post) 634-5789 Jan 2022 OP
K&R! SheltieLover Jan 2022 #1
Yes! Poiuyt Jan 2022 #2
This is a Game Changer FakeNoose Jan 2022 #3
Good! Asheville NC is so Cha Jan 2022 #4
Also for using chewing tobacco at the House podium. vanlassie Jan 2022 #5
The 14th Amendment Zeitghost Jan 2022 #6
hmm. have redistricting lines changed to include Asheville now? msfiddlestix Jan 2022 #7

FakeNoose

(32,577 posts)
3. This is a Game Changer
Mon Jan 10, 2022, 07:40 PM
Jan 2022

From the OP link:

The legal challenge brought against Rep. Cawthorn cites Section Three of the Fourteenth Amendment, known as the Disqualification Clause, which states, in part, “No Person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress. . . who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress . . . to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof.”

Monday's release adds that no criminal conviction is required under the clause, and that "Cawthorn would be able to seek judicial review of an adverse decision."


Get these INSURRECTIONISTS off the ballot! If that doesn't work, vote them all out!

Zeitghost

(3,844 posts)
6. The 14th Amendment
Mon Jan 10, 2022, 08:24 PM
Jan 2022

Makes no mention of a reasonable suspicion standard. This will go down in flames, as it should.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Challenge filed against C...