Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

kentuck

(111,082 posts)
Thu Jan 13, 2022, 11:13 AM Jan 2022

One response from Trump's NPR interview that hangs out there...

When questioned about why Rudy Guiliani and his lawyers never brought up "fraud" in front of any of the courts? Yet, they were telling their supporters the election was a "fraud"? In other words, they were in front of the judges and they had no evidence whatsoever. Any wonder why the judges ruled against them in almost every single case, except the one where the poll watchers were permitted to stand closer.

Trump said:

"It was too early to ask for fraud and to talk about fraud. Rudy said that, because of the fact it was very early with the — because that was obviously at a very, very — that was a long time ago. The things that have found out have more than bore out what people thought and what people felt and what people found."

=============

It was too early to ask for fraud???

34 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
One response from Trump's NPR interview that hangs out there... (Original Post) kentuck Jan 2022 OP
He can't even LIE properly.. what a useless POS this man is... secondwind Jan 2022 #1
I think it sounds like... Cracklin Charlie Jan 2022 #6
Brain in a blender lagomorph777 Jan 2022 #2
Yet Mad_Machine76 Jan 2022 #4
That can be an advantage.... TheRealNorth Jan 2022 #8
Yes. No coherence. Harker Jan 2022 #16
Would you like a maraschino cherry on that? erronis Jan 2022 #28
The enhanced extraordinary care wing. jaxexpat Jan 2022 #24
I'd maybe wipe off the cherry and dump the rest. n/t Harker Jan 2022 #31
Early - early - long time ago - now (found) underpants Jan 2022 #3
Sounds like they were working off some kind of timeline plan. Cracklin Charlie Jan 2022 #5
No, he would just lie. Mr.Bill Jan 2022 #19
Made me laugh, thanks, I needed some humor. gab13by13 Jan 2022 #29
"Too early"? sop Jan 2022 #7
Thank You for posting...K and R Stuart G Jan 2022 #9
Trump still grifting off the Big Lie. sarcasmo Jan 2022 #10
Remember when we thought GHWB rambled incoherently ? eppur_se_muova Jan 2022 #11
What "Thinks"? DallasNE Jan 2022 #12
I'm no English professor. It was my least favorite subject in school. iscooterliberally Jan 2022 #13
Yes, sir. Only if your brain is as addled as that demon brain can the words be understood. Alexander Of Assyria Jan 2022 #14
Chump stops himself from saying that the fraud hadn't happened yet FakeNoose Jan 2022 #15
Did this POS rownesheck Jan 2022 #17
I noticed that at the time. CaptainTruth Jan 2022 #18
A lawyer who knowingly lies to a judge can be disbarred. OMGWTF Jan 2022 #20
He would have made a great trial lawyer! BobTheSubgenius Jan 2022 #21
They KNEW there was fraud. dchill Jan 2022 #22
So... They don't ask for fraud now because? Ohio Joe Jan 2022 #23
That interview proved one thing SCantiGOP Jan 2022 #25
Does the MAGA base understand word salad? Martin Eden Jan 2022 #26
Simple enough... krkaufman Jan 2022 #27
They knew there wasn't fraud involved but also knew they could allege it all day long Mr. Ected Jan 2022 #30
Could be a bit of addled flashback on the part of TFG -- perhaps allegorical oracle Jan 2022 #32
Like a big, fat turd that hasn't hit the bowl yet; dangling from an asshole... Blue Owl Jan 2022 #33
Typical Trump answer - gibberish. GoodRaisin Jan 2022 #34

Cracklin Charlie

(12,904 posts)
6. I think it sounds like...
Thu Jan 13, 2022, 11:36 AM
Jan 2022

He keeps realizing he’s about to say something incriminating, and he still manages to stop the freight train (his mouth) from saying something to implicate himself or others.

His handlers must really hate him giving interviews. He always confesses his own crimes, because he’s proud of himself. But, this time, many other people’s freedom is on the line. Sad.

erronis

(15,241 posts)
28. Would you like a maraschino cherry on that?
Thu Jan 13, 2022, 02:00 PM
Jan 2022

The image of a trumpian brain(?) being whirred and then served to his masses is a bit disturbing.

I guess one could order that on top of a Frappucino at your local stirbucks.

underpants

(182,787 posts)
3. Early - early - long time ago - now (found)
Thu Jan 13, 2022, 11:21 AM
Jan 2022

It’s like one of those movies with a wormhole. We all get lost at some point in the story

I love this “ because that was obviously at a very, very”

Cracklin Charlie

(12,904 posts)
5. Sounds like they were working off some kind of timeline plan.
Thu Jan 13, 2022, 11:27 AM
Jan 2022

Fraud was further down on the list of schemes they would enact to try to overturn the election.

Trump will never be questioned under oath about his coup attempt. He would crumble, and give up everyone. It will be interesting to see the attempts to avoid giving testimony. I predict chaos, should he be subpoenaed.

sop

(10,166 posts)
7. "Too early"?
Thu Jan 13, 2022, 11:44 AM
Jan 2022

Trump had been alleging fraud all during the 2020 campaign and he started filing suits right after the election.

eppur_se_muova

(36,261 posts)
11. Remember when we thought GHWB rambled incoherently ?
Thu Jan 13, 2022, 11:50 AM
Jan 2022

TFG does something like a buffer dump anytime he's asked a question -- whatever phrases he's recently associated with that topic, he just dumps them all together and leaves it up to the listener to figure out how to make a coherent statement from the collection. MAGAts hear what they want to hear; to the rest of us, it's just content-free gibberish.

iscooterliberally

(2,860 posts)
13. I'm no English professor. It was my least favorite subject in school.
Thu Jan 13, 2022, 12:34 PM
Jan 2022

I can't listen to Trump though. All he ever does is sputter sentence fragments. I guess if I snorted a gram of cocaine first he might start making sense to me. That would probably land me a trip straight to the ER though.

 

Alexander Of Assyria

(7,839 posts)
14. Yes, sir. Only if your brain is as addled as that demon brain can the words be understood.
Thu Jan 13, 2022, 12:42 PM
Jan 2022

Fox or actual cocaine? Either seems to work.

Not that I would know ofc….

FakeNoose

(32,634 posts)
15. Chump stops himself from saying that the fraud hadn't happened yet
Thu Jan 13, 2022, 12:47 PM
Jan 2022

The fraud didn't happen until January 6th, and it was done by the Repukes. But of course even Chump realizes that if he actually said that, he'd be incriminating all of them.

I think we should give him lots more chances to incriminate himself. Eventually he WILL do it, wait and see.

CaptainTruth

(6,589 posts)
18. I noticed that at the time.
Thu Jan 13, 2022, 12:55 PM
Jan 2022

Publicly they went on & on about fraud, said hundreds (if not thousands) of times there was fraud, yet none of the lawsuits they filed claimed there was any fraud.

It seemed clear that they realized they could blatantly lie to their low-information MAGAt followers & get away with it, but blatantly lying to a judge in court would not end well for them.

OMGWTF

(3,952 posts)
20. A lawyer who knowingly lies to a judge can be disbarred.
Thu Jan 13, 2022, 01:35 PM
Jan 2022

That's likely the real reason why Ghouliani didn't bring up fraud in court. Rudy knows he's full of guano.

dchill

(38,474 posts)
22. They KNEW there was fraud.
Thu Jan 13, 2022, 01:38 PM
Jan 2022

They also knew they were the fraudsters. Their story was still being written.

Ohio Joe

(21,755 posts)
23. So... They don't ask for fraud now because?
Thu Jan 13, 2022, 01:40 PM
Jan 2022

Because there was no fucking fraud... Gah, that fucking guy is an idiot.

SCantiGOP

(13,869 posts)
25. That interview proved one thing
Thu Jan 13, 2022, 01:48 PM
Jan 2022

There is no one he is listening to for advice. No one would have let him go on NPR if they could have stopped him.
There was nothing for him to gain. It was pure ego wanting to have an audience.

krkaufman

(13,435 posts)
27. Simple enough...
Thu Jan 13, 2022, 02:00 PM
Jan 2022

He’s evolved the lie to be that it was too early to cite fraud because the evidence proving fraud had not YET been collected. It now has been.

Mr. Ected

(9,670 posts)
30. They knew there wasn't fraud involved but also knew they could allege it all day long
Thu Jan 13, 2022, 02:03 PM
Jan 2022

On television, since the only way they'd have to pay the price for their lies is if those statements were made under oath. That's why Rudy would go on TV and say one thing and then step into court and say another.


allegorical oracle

(2,357 posts)
32. Could be a bit of addled flashback on the part of TFG -- perhaps
Thu Jan 13, 2022, 02:35 PM
Jan 2022

recalling Rudy's reaction upon losing the 1989 NYC Mayoral race. Rudy lost to David Dinkins by 47,080 votes and pitched a hissy fit, claiming Dinkins' voters stole votes. He said this in a CNN interview in 2016:

“When I ran for mayor of New York City the first time, some people voted eight and 10 times. And the second time, I had — I had firefighters and police officers outside checking on the buses, so we take down the number of the bus. The bus had voted 10 times. And then we wouldn't let the bus vote again,’’ Giuliani told host Jake Tapper. He then insisted that because of his own campaign’s vigilance in 1993, he was able to reduce the cheating to just 25,000 votes that year, helping him defeat the incumbent mayor. “Dead people generally vote for Democrats, rather than Republicans,’’ Giuliani added.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»One response from Trump's...