General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsBREAKING: Supreme Court blocks Biden workplace vaccine-or-test requirement
Link to tweet
Link to tweet
Lawrence Hurley
@lawrencehurley
·
Jan 13, 2022
Replying to @lawrencehurley
BREAKING: Supreme Court allows Biden to enforce vaccine mandate for healthcare workers nationwide
Lawrence Hurley
@lawrencehurley
Justice Kavanaugh joins Chief Justice and liberals in the 5-4 decision allowing the healthcare vaccine mandate. Three liberals in dissent in the 6-3 decision blocking the OSHA policy
12:33 PM · Jan 13, 2022
Goodheart
(5,308 posts)Johnny2X2X
(18,973 posts)So I will be forced to work next to unvaxxed spreaders soon.
Zeitghost
(3,848 posts)The numbers seem to indicate everyone is spreading it.
2naSalit
(86,332 posts)Exacerbate the worker shortage and everything that comes with it.
Celerity
(43,119 posts)dalton99a
(81,404 posts)Think about that one
Nevilledog
(51,023 posts)Link to tweet
NoelCaslerComedy
@caslernoel
SCOTUS blocks big business vaccine mandate so now you can die at your job while your vote doesnt count.
12:35 PM · Jan 13, 2022
crickets
(25,952 posts)Link to tweet
Replying to @caslernoel
The same SCOTUS that is so right to life now? Shocker.
2:36 PM · Jan 13, 2022
Poiuyt
(18,117 posts)vaccine mandates were okay. About a 100 years ago during either the small pox or the Spanish Flu epidemic (I forget which).
MisterProton
(56 posts)The OSHA ruling vote was 6-3 with Breyer, Sotomayor, and Kagan in dissent.
"Permitting OSHA to regulate the hazards of daily life - simply because most Americans have jobs and face those same risks while on the clock - would significantly expand OSHAs regulatory authority without clear congressional authorization."
I see the logic, you can't have an unelected body having unlimited authority over such a broad swath of material without getting authorization for it. There have to be lines drawn somewhere. What if they had issued such a crazy edict as making everyone eat vegetables or go to the gym daily? Yes, its a good idea, but just because it's a good idea doesn't mean they have the authority to enforce it.
Poiuyt
(18,117 posts)wellst0nev0ter
(7,509 posts)But not businesses? Isn't that discriminatory to healthcare workers?
The justices are legislating from the bench. Period.
MisterProton
(56 posts)It's one thing to have a nurse or doctor standing over you while your compromised. It's another thing to ask some guy digging a ditch out in a field, who is in good health and not in a high risk group to get one.
As with most legislation, its a compromise. Same thing with abortion or any other legislation. Neither extreme is going to get what they want generally.
Ace Rothstein
(3,144 posts)Poiuyt
(18,117 posts)democrattotheend
(11,605 posts)To the best of my knowledge, there is no Supreme Court precedent allowing the FEDERAL government to mandate vaccines. Health and welfare mandates are traditionally a power reserved to the states. Jacobsen v. Massachusetts, the smallpox case from 1905 that I believe you are referring to, upheld a state or local vaccine mandate, not a federal one.
Response to Nevilledog (Original post)
budkin This message was self-deleted by its author.
drray23
(7,616 posts)First tweet says it's blocked, next one says Roberts joined with liberals to allow the mandate.
Patton French
(745 posts)Nevilledog
(51,023 posts)Horse with no Name
(33,956 posts)Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin
(107,757 posts)Casady1
(2,133 posts)rule in favor of corporations.
Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin
(107,757 posts)It was the red states. In Florida it's illegal for any corporation to require a vaccine.
Casady1
(2,133 posts)but the red states were doing the corporations bidding.
LowerManhattanite
(2,385 posts)is high on my Do not travel to/Limit business with list.
Nixie
(16,950 posts)for requiring workers to get vaxxed and wear masks. So the non-complying workers won.
kentuck
(111,052 posts)Or will they continue to hold on to it for political reasons?
shrike3
(3,489 posts)But if they die -- they die.
As Bob Dylan once said, "I used to care, but things have changed."
nattyice
(331 posts)shrike3
(3,489 posts)MichMan
(11,869 posts)Unless a particular state prohibits it
nattyice
(331 posts)BGBD
(3,282 posts)The. Instead all federal agencies to deny contract bids to any company without a vaccine mandate. Call it a national security issue and related to force readiness.
democrattotheend
(11,605 posts)Especially of calling it a "national security issue". That is how the Bush administration got away with a lot of abuse and overreach, in the name of national security.
BGBD
(3,282 posts)If covid outbreaks are hurting defense supply chains.
ecstatic
(32,653 posts)There is an assumption that any company with over 100 employees can easily comply but that's not the case with every company. We're already stretched to capacity and having to babysit/monitor the unvaxxed and their weekly tests would have been too much of an administrative burden. We'd literally have to assign folks to observe employees taking their weekly tests. Let someone else babysit the unvaxxed. Social workers or something. As was discussed during the oral arguments, the people who are at risk due to the unvaxxed are the unvaxxed.