General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forums"We're 15 years too late": Endocrine-disrupting plastic additive BPA is still in everything
(Salon) Shortly before 2021 came to a close, a little-known agency proposed some new safety standards that accidentally triggered serious questions about human health in the age of plastics.
More specifically, the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) determined that a plastic additive called bisphenol A (BPA) needs to be dramatically reduced in our environment that is, people should have their exposure to the chemical limited to no more than 0.018 nanograms per pound of body weight per day. This would decrease one's interactions with the pollutant by a factor of 100,000 from what they currently are.
In case you have been living in a part of the world that is untouched by plastic which, it turns out, doesn't exist BPA is everywhere, in all kinds of different plastics. Aside from some laws limiting its use in infant formula packaging and baby bottles, companies use it to make water bottles and food can liners, leftover containers and dishware, eyeglass lenses and household electronics, and even commercial receipts that come out of thermal printers. BPAs are in microplastics, or tiny plastic particles that you consume but rarely see because they are so small. And BPA is so ubiquitous that it gets inside our bodies before we are even born: one 2014 study detected the chemical in 75% of nursing mothers' breast milk, and in the urine of 93% of their infants.
This wouldn't be an issue if there weren't concerns about BPA affecting human health. (More on that later). Despite its ubiquity in the human body, and despite growing public awareness about plastic pollution, there are almost no meaningful regulations on BPA in the United States.
Many companies claim to be reducing their use of BPA, as observed in the recent trend of labeling cans and plastic bottles "BPA-free." Unfortunately, many of the replacements for BPA are equally bad, and some cause genetic defects, as Science previously reported. ...............................(more)
https://www.salon.com/2022/01/16/bpa-plastics-harmful/
samplegirl
(11,474 posts)All the bottled water.
Diamond_Dog
(31,950 posts)Hassin Bin Sober
(26,318 posts)yardwork
(61,585 posts)bedazzled
(1,761 posts)I can't watch that movie since cheetolini
yardwork
(61,585 posts)pecosbob
(7,534 posts)A man to look up to...
Hassin Bin Sober
(26,318 posts)Caught up in the Red Scare.
Also busted for hashish in the Toronto airport. Sounds like he would have been fun to hang around with.
pandr32
(11,572 posts)I am old enough to remember very little of it in the household. Things sure are different now.
gab13by13
(21,280 posts)the flimsier the water bottle the more the chemicals will leach out.
pandr32
(11,572 posts)Someone handed me one once and I struggled to hold and drink from it.
bedazzled
(1,761 posts)I mean, strawberries? Cookies? It is heartbreaking
pandr32
(11,572 posts)It has snuck into everything we use/have. Even baby clothes and blankets. We must change our ways.
bedazzled
(1,761 posts)I, too, remember cardboard and glass packaging. What a mess we have made
calimary
(81,179 posts)Sheeesh.
Better living through chemicals.
Mossfern
(2,459 posts)Last edited Sun Jan 16, 2022, 03:19 PM - Edit history (1)
I grew up in a time when there were very few plastics. I remember being hugely jealous of my best friend Michelle because she had plastic toys. When my kids were young (they're 33 to 43 years old now) , at the supermarket - I let them know that if they wanted anything special that it couldn't come in a plastic container. They used to hunt down glass bottled stuff with me.
Apart from shipping weight and safety issues about breakage, why can't we go back to non plastic packaging? I'm sure that all that plastic going to recycling centers is not being recycled. Paper is a renewable resource, glass can be reused or recycled - same with many metals. How were people able to survive without plastic for so many centuries?
NickB79
(19,233 posts)Precisely because of chemicals like these.
We're going down a bad path here for the future of our species.
hunter
(38,309 posts)In wildlife, it's a bad thing.
Yeah, I'm that kind of radical environmentalist.
I'm also a humanist. I worry most about chemicals that adversely affect human intelligence and empathy, teratogens, and chemicals that cause serious illnesses such as cancer.
If BPAs or other environmental toxins turned some people into Trump supporters that would be a bad thing, even if in the long term it inhibited their ability to reproduce.
NickB79
(19,233 posts)Ugh
GoCubsGo
(32,078 posts)A lot of them are made of plastic, especially the less-expensive ones. Not every manufacturer is using BPA-free plastic. It really narrows down the choices.