Djokovic circus unleashes toxic chain reaction of mistrust and resentment
The world No 1 fought his deportation case with trademark resilience which has unleashed forces larger than himhttps://www.theguardian.com/sport/2022/jan/17/djokovic-circus-unleashes-toxic-chain-reaction-of-mistrust-and-resentment
Novak Djokovic fought the Australian government in the same way he fought his rivals on the tennis court: with defiance and stone-willed refusal, with every tool at his disposal and every last fibre of his being, with an unshakeable and messianic belief in his own supremacy. He contested his deportation as if it were a crucial break point, as if it were his last stand against total oblivion. This time, however, something startling happened. He lost.
Djokovic is unused to losing. When he does, he tends to explain it away as the product of his own failings. He courteously congratulates his opponents, but ultimately leaves you with the impression that he decides who wins and loses. His collection of trophies and records – 20 grand slam titles, the most weeks at world No 1 in the history of men’s tennis – suggests he is probably right. But implicit in that too is an assertion of control and individual impregnability: this is my business, and I will deal with it myself.
The problems arise when you begin to conflate the hard white lines of the tennis court with the messy compromises of the world at large. Djokovic would hardly be the first professional athlete to labour under the delusion that his superior sporting ability confers some kind of elite virtue, a firewall against judgment and scrutiny. Nor would he be the first to confuse his athletic gifts with expertise in other fields: lifestyle, health and medicine, even politics. “I can show you how to change not just your body but your whole experience of living,” he promises in his 2013 book Serve to Win: part-autobiography, part-nutrition guide and a presage of the Instagram influencer culture that bundles up diet, mental health, body-narcissism and alternative medicine into a shiny, sellable package.
No athlete is obliged to stay in their lane. But anybody who leverages their fame, power and privilege in this way has a responsibility to do so with care, to reckon with the consequences of their choices, to recognise when they have become counter-productive. And perhaps the most disquieting aspect of the last fortnight, as the Djokovic circus rolled out of Melbourne Airport and on to our smartphones and television screens, is the way Djokovic’s choices have unleashed forces and currents far larger than him, or indeed tennis: a toxic chain reaction of mistrust and resentment that could lead us into some extremely dark places.
snip
= new reply since forum marked as read
The group assembled to greet him at the airport on his arrival back in Serbia was rather a disappointment.
Life goes on, and support returns to the comfort of their own homes and minds. I was upset but not surprised that members of his family continue to push the outrageous claim that Novak was being singled out and unjustly detained, treated like a criminal ‘for no reason’. Like some pawn in a political game.
I’ve never fallen for Djokovic’s antics. For me, the GOAT will be Nadal, regardless if/when No-Vax surpasses him in total Titles won. Nadal is a sportsman, not ‘just a world class tennis player’. He is always respectful on court towards his opponent, gracious in victory and defeat. And he doesn’t berate and abuse the lines-people or chair-umpire. And he doesn’t abuse his racquets either.
Vamos Rafa!! 
Very well said. 
