Get to know these names. They will hopefully go down in history.

[garybeck]

Kathy Brenden
Stanley Grot
Merian Sheridan
Meshawn Maddock

Don't know who they are yet? Hopefully these names will be familiar to the American people, soon.

This is a partial list of the people who fraudulently forged their names on the fake election documents in Michigan. It took me a while to find these names, as they are not being mentioned very much in the media (yet). There are more people in Michigan (article says 14 people signed them in Michigan), and other states, so the list will grow.

These people attempted to overthrow our government, no less than the Oath Keepers who have been charged.

While mainstream media doesn't seem to be propping these people up yet, perhaps social media will. Note, I googled Stan Grot and found he is actually running for a seat in the state house. He might want to reconsider. His opponent might want to pay attention to this story.

The questions remain -- Who told them to do it? Who created the fake documents that they signed? Who's idea was it?

The answers to these and other questions could blow the roof of the investigations and bring us closer to the truth.

And we all know where that leads.

https://www.clickondetroit.com/news/local/2022/01/10/report-michigan-republicans-tried-to-overturn-2020-election-with-false-documents/

The documents were obtained by Politico and show that 16 Republicans forged and signed papers attempting to certify the election for former President Donald Trump.

Among those that signed was Kathy Brenden, a Republican National Committee member from Michigan, Shelby Township Clerk Stanley Grot, the MI-GOP Grassroots chair Merian Sheridan and current State Party co-chair Meshawn Maddock. Maddock was elected to her post after sending the fraudulent documents.

[Skittles]

1. check this out

these people are fucking brazen

https://www.detroitnews.com/story/news/politics/2022/01/04/stan-grot-michigan-house-candidate/9088975002/

[garybeck]

3. he might want to reconsider. n/t

[Frasier Balzov]

2. Rachel explained that these people just forgot to include a key phrase.

It's the phrase which acknowledges that their slate is contingent only. Their colleagues in PA were careful enough to include it.

It's the phrase which requires a court to throw out the official slate (or the legislature to formally withdraw it) before their alternate slate claims to replace it.

Nobody is going to be prosecuted for such a rhetorical omission.

[garybeck]

4. you're baffling me with bs

nothing personal but no matter how you look at it, they forged the documents and they tried to make it look like Trump won when he lost. regardless of the legalese it's not a good thing to do. if the law doesn't put them in their place, hopefully social media will.

[mahina]

5. Oopsie doodles. But the MI Attorney General disagrees, says there are definitely

Prosecutable crimes and serious ones. She’sgoing to see what the feds are going to do and if they’re not going to do anything them MI will prosecute.

So there’s that

[dchill]

6. PA didn't "include" it. They ADDED it. To cover their asses.

The other states' asses are uncovered.

[pecosbob]

8. I thought it was two states that did so.

[pecosbob]

7. I believe the form letter was distributed by ALEC

IIRC this idea originated during the 'war-gaming' that took place at the annual RAGA meeting (Republican Attorney Generals Association) when they posed the question 'What can we do if Trump loses the election?'. The rat-f*ckers in place at the state level likely got their marching orders and their identical copies distributed to them by ALEC.

The states that added the clause were the savvy ones. NAL. but they committed no forgery and no election interference as far as I can see. They both state that the document has no legal significance unless the election were to be found to invalid by unappealable judicial ruling. The idiots in the five other states didn't have enough brains to add to their copies.