General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsUSS Kittyhawk headed to scrapyard.
Last edited Wed Jan 19, 2022, 01:54 PM - Edit history (1)
https://www.newsbreakapp.com/n/0doyJNrS?pd=0AvpfOUS&lang=en_US&s=i16One of the other carriers in that class was sunk to form a man made reef. They had a hard time sinking it.
Angleae
(4,480 posts)Kitty Hawk's sister that was sunk, USS America, is at a depth of nearly 17000ft, a bit deep for a reef, and they had no problem putting her down. You might be thinking of USS Oriskany, a much older ship (Essex-class, commissioned 1950), which was sunk near Pensacola as a reef.
Calista241
(5,586 posts)They wanted it to sink and rest on the bottom as if it was upright in the ocean, which was really why they had a hard time sinking it. Blowing a hole in its keel and having the carrier roll over on its back would have been relatively easy.
Resting on its keel, with the deck, hanger and bridge quarters open to the sea would provide more surface area and nooks and crannies for wildlife to flourish.
I'm glad we're scrapping it instead of sending it to Indian scrapyards like most countries with old and retiring ships. At least it'll be done with a modicum of concern for the environment.
hunter
(38,302 posts)I had one friend whose brother was serving on the Enterprise, another the Kittyhawk.
You can guess which was more prestigious.
Curiously another friend of ours, who was in on those conversations, was later an officer on the Enterprise.
Emile
(22,485 posts)ripcord
(5,268 posts)He was onboard for race riots during the Vietnam war.
Shellback Squid
(8,914 posts)the crew fondly referred to her as the "Shitty Kitty" our crew called our ship "The Connie"
The Connie was turned in to razor blades a few years back
The cost of cleaning the asbestos and other toxic chemicals from these old carriers is prohibitive so
they recycle them