Don't fuck with this woman....!

[pbmus]

Link to tweet

Link to tweet

[NCjack]

1. That message will keep TFG foaming thru the weekend

[Progressive Jones]

6. That, and SCOTUS telling him they won't hide his dirt. He's gotta be steaming right now. nt

[Blue Owl]

2. Former Fat Fuck Foams Furiously Following Fictitious Filings

[Celerity]

3. he still is a fat fuck

[Progressive Jones]

7. Bulbous Bozo Blathers Bilge... nt

[malaise]

18. Nicely done

[spanone]

4. ...K&R...

[PoliticAverse]

5. Unless she plans on offering them immunity, they will be able to "evade testifying"...

by invoking their 5th amendment rights.

[wnylib]

8. Technically, they will be testifying,

even if all they do is evoke the 5th.

So, without their testimony, she can still file against them, using available documents and testimony from others.

[Progressive Jones]

10. HA! ya beat me to it! nt

[PoliticAverse]

12. It's a semantic argument whether that constitutes "testifying" or not, but it means they don't....

have to answer the questions asked - which constitutes "evading" answering.

[Progressive Jones]

9. She may be expecting this refusal. If they won't talk, they can't defend themselves against

the evidence she brings forth. She might have all she needs already.

[wnylib]

11. Exactly. Their silence will convict them.

[PoliticAverse]

13. It doesn't work that way. n/t

[wnylib]

15. Really? AG presents evidence. Defense refuses to respond.

All that's left is the evidence.

[PoliticAverse]

16. And then what? The AG can indict and then the defendant can present a defense...

without having helped the AG by previously having given testimony.

[DFW]

14. No one is above the law. Now, remove those roadblocks, and............

Nail their arrogant asses to the barn door!

(Please, if it's not too much trouble--or even if it is!)

[Tickle]

17. Go get them!

I doubt they will voluntarily go to NY