Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Atticus

(15,124 posts)
Mon Jan 24, 2022, 02:21 PM Jan 2022

"My $10 political contribution won't make any difference" is cut from the same cloth as

"My one vote won't make any difference".

Both statements are false and both are promoted---directly and indirectly---by the Republican party and the "dog's breakfast" of white supremacists, religious extremists and billionaires who fund it and attack any who dare oppose it.

I understand that there are some who literally have no dollars to spare, but most of us---even if we can't contribute $50 or $100 or more in one chunk---CAN afford $5 or $10 each month. That would amount to $50 or $100 by next November and if hundreds or thousands or more of us do that, well, folks, that can make a BIG difference.

The people who may ridicule you for bothering to send your candidate "only" $10 are simply saying that you are not important; you don't matter.

Make them regret saying that.

"MATTER!"

Send whatever you can spare.

3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
"My $10 political contribution won't make any difference" is cut from the same cloth as (Original Post) Atticus Jan 2022 OP
If you are able, donating once is a more efficient use of the dollars. keithbvadu2 Jan 2022 #1
Are paper checks no longer used? nt Atticus Jan 2022 #2
I'm sure they must be but credit cards are so much easier to process. keithbvadu2 Jan 2022 #3

keithbvadu2

(36,369 posts)
1. If you are able, donating once is a more efficient use of the dollars.
Mon Jan 24, 2022, 02:46 PM
Jan 2022

($12 once is more efficient than $1 twelve times)

https://www.politico.com/news/magazine/2019/11/25/small-dollar-online-donors-politics-credit-card-processing-072949

Low-dollar, repeat contributions are a great talking point for campaigns. They’ve also resulted in a massive financial windfall for credit card processors.
----------------------

Donors have responded in droves— donating tens, hundreds or even thousands of times, in amounts as small as $1. But what these grassroots supporters may not realize is that, in making small, repeated contributions, they have, in aggregate, delivered a huge payday for the middlemen, often large banks and financial institutions that process those payments.
-------------------------------------

A Newsy analysis of Federal Election Commission data found that since the start of the 2008 election cycle, federal political campaigns have paid more than $220 million to credit card-processing companies including American Express, Bank of America and PayPal, among dozens of others.

Between the 2008 and 2016 election cycles, the amount nearly doubled, from $28.2 million to $51.5 million. The 2020 cycle is on pace to shatter that record: Through October, the 2020 campaigns spent more than $23.8 million in processing fees—more than a year before the election.
-----------------------------

“The smaller the transaction amount,” Zucker said, “the larger the percentage of that transaction that disappears into fixed fees.”
-----------------------------------------

And as contributors make smaller but more frequent contributions, those per-transaction costs have a disproportionate impact.

To illustrate the point, Zucker gave a commercially reasonable rate—similar to Stripe's or PayPal’s—of 3 percent plus 30 cents per transaction. Imagine a single donor makes a $1,000 contribution to a candidate under that scenario: The campaign would get $969.70, and the processing middlemen (Visa, Wells Fargo, and so on) would take $30.30. But that balance changes radically if the campaign has a thousand different supporters make tiny online donations of a $1 apiece. In that case, the existence of per-transaction fees means the credit card processors would take $330, while campaign would get only $670 — even as it would be able to tout a low average donation size.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (more at the article)

keithbvadu2

(36,369 posts)
3. I'm sure they must be but credit cards are so much easier to process.
Mon Jan 24, 2022, 05:31 PM
Jan 2022

But then either one can be used for the recurring donations that one does not realize they signed up for.

I would think a single purchase credit card, such as Visa or MC, would be safer because when it runs out of money, it's no more drain on your money.

What if someone used a dead single purchase credit card for a donation?

How soon might they catch it?

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»"My $10 political contrib...