Fri Jan 28, 2022, 07:16 PM

Casady1 (2,133 posts)

Anita Hill for Supreme court justice

I'll supply the coke for the confirmation hearings and a case on the first day on the court.

17 replies, 895 views

Thread info Bookmark this thread Trash this thread

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum

Replies to this discussion thread

17 replies	Author	Time	Post
Anita Hill for Supreme court justice (Original post)	Casady1	Jan 2022	OP
No. nt	BlackSkimmer	Jan 2022	#1
+1	Sherman A1	Jan 2022	#2
She would certainly be da bomb!!! Boom	LakeArenal	Jan 2022	#3
WTF?	demmiblue	Jan 2022	#4
This is already an old joke.	iemanja	Jan 2022	#5
Very old.	BlackSkimmer	Jan 2022	#6
Just stop. She's 65, never been a judge, and there's a short list	Ocelot II	Jan 2022	#7
No. She's a conservative. Plus we need someone younger and a liberal. Maybe Nina Turner	Hassin Bin Sober	Jan 2022	#8
OMG! From bad to worse! n/t	Eyeball_Kid	Jan 2022	#10
I'm sure Nina Turner was intended as a joke, since she is a joke.	Ocelot II	Jan 2022	#11
No. Too old and the picking a SCOTUS Justice is not a childish game of 'gotcha' for us.	Celerity	Jan 2022	#9
no, someone younger...real young and healthy.. who will live to 101	Demovictory9	Jan 2022	#12
At this point I would just hope that whomever the nominee	walkingman	Jan 2022	#13
Cute, but she's 65. No thanks.	11 Bravo	Jan 2022	#14
It would have been fun however to witness Ginni's head exploding..n/t	SheilaAnn	Jan 2022	#15
Enough already.	we can do it	Jan 2022	#16
Okay, I can see this	Deep State Witch	Jan 2022	#17

Response to Casady1 (Original post)

Fri Jan 28, 2022, 07:17 PM

BlackSkimmer (51,308 posts)

1. No. nt

Reply to this post

Response to BlackSkimmer (Reply #1)

Fri Jan 28, 2022, 07:17 PM

Sherman A1 (38,958 posts)

2. +1

Reply to this post

Response to Casady1 (Original post)

Fri Jan 28, 2022, 07:18 PM

LakeArenal (27,710 posts)

3. She would certainly be da bomb!!! Boom

I don’t think Biden would step into that politically. It would certainly make for his past mistakes regarding that case.

Reply to this post

Response to Casady1 (Original post)

Fri Jan 28, 2022, 07:19 PM

demmiblue (36,198 posts)

4. WTF?

Reply to this post

Response to Casady1 (Original post)

Fri Jan 28, 2022, 07:19 PM

iemanja (52,852 posts)

5. This is already an old joke.

Reply to this post

Response to iemanja (Reply #5)

Fri Jan 28, 2022, 07:20 PM

BlackSkimmer (51,308 posts)

6. Very old.

Very tired.

Reply to this post

Response to Casady1 (Original post)

Fri Jan 28, 2022, 07:20 PM

Ocelot II (111,633 posts)

7. Just stop. She's 65, never been a judge, and there's a short list

of highly-qualified sitting federal judges, any of whom would be a far better choice. The only reason anybody is suggesting Hill is supposedly to stick it to Clarence Thomas, which is a really stupid basis for choosing a Supreme Court justice.

Reply to this post

Response to Casady1 (Original post)

Fri Jan 28, 2022, 07:21 PM

Hassin Bin Sober (25,851 posts)

8. No. She's a conservative. Plus we need someone younger and a liberal. Maybe Nina Turner

She’s not busy…

Reply to this post

Response to Hassin Bin Sober (Reply #8)

Fri Jan 28, 2022, 07:25 PM

Eyeball_Kid (7,307 posts)

10. OMG! From bad to worse! n/t

Reply to this post

Response to Eyeball_Kid (Reply #10)

Fri Jan 28, 2022, 07:31 PM

Ocelot II (111,633 posts)

11. I'm sure Nina Turner was intended as a joke, since she is a joke.

Just apart from the fact that she's not even a lawyer for real, she's also not even a Democrat for real.

Reply to this post

Response to Casady1 (Original post)

Fri Jan 28, 2022, 07:21 PM

Celerity (39,070 posts)

9. No. Too old and the picking a SCOTUS Justice is not a childish game of 'gotcha' for us.

Reply to this post

Response to Casady1 (Original post)

Fri Jan 28, 2022, 07:35 PM

Demovictory9 (30,417 posts)

12. no, someone younger...real young and healthy.. who will live to 101

Reply to this post

Response to Casady1 (Original post)

Fri Jan 28, 2022, 08:02 PM

walkingman (6,610 posts)

13. At this point I would just hope that whomever the nominee

they are not a "religious" ideolog. I think the biggest generational problem we will have long after I'm gone will be based more on religious ideology vs political. Politics is much more flexible that religion. Since 1980 we have gone down the rabbit hole of pseudo-religion and it is destroying this nation. Time to move into the 21st century. Enough of this "magic man" philosophy.

Reply to this post

Response to Casady1 (Original post)

Fri Jan 28, 2022, 08:37 PM

11 Bravo (23,859 posts)