Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

bluestarone

(16,859 posts)
Tue Feb 1, 2022, 11:35 AM Feb 2022

I do have to mention ONE thing here ( about TFG's BIGGEST MISTAKE in my eyes)

I honestly believe that TFG (LOSER) made probably the ONE biggest mistake, thank God! That was not giving a BLANKET PARDON for all involved with the terrorists attack on Jan. 6th. THIS would have, in my eyes STOPPED all investigations going on now. They, (the rethugs in the house and senate) will finish their plan if they get control! We ALL have to get involved more than ever in 22 and 24. VOTE and help OTHERS vote like never before!! I wish there was a way to stop a president from pardoning anyone they choose.

7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
I do have to mention ONE thing here ( about TFG's BIGGEST MISTAKE in my eyes) (Original Post) bluestarone Feb 2022 OP
I'm not sure a blanket pardon would be legal. Haggard Celine Feb 2022 #1
Not sure if you're right. BUT bluestarone Feb 2022 #4
That's a possibility. Haggard Celine Feb 2022 #6
There are a set of rules gab13by13 Feb 2022 #2
You mean Loser. blm Feb 2022 #3
YEP! TY. bluestarone Feb 2022 #5
A blanket pardon likely wouldn't have stopped the investigations. onenote Feb 2022 #7

Haggard Celine

(16,834 posts)
1. I'm not sure a blanket pardon would be legal.
Tue Feb 1, 2022, 11:48 AM
Feb 2022

I think pardons have to be individual and the person has to be named.

bluestarone

(16,859 posts)
4. Not sure if you're right. BUT
Tue Feb 1, 2022, 11:59 AM
Feb 2022

It could have been done, THEN tie it up in courts, giving them time that they need?

Haggard Celine

(16,834 posts)
6. That's a possibility.
Tue Feb 1, 2022, 12:38 PM
Feb 2022

Trump is great at delaying justice. He fights everything out in court and takes it all the way to the end. The people who would be receiving a blanket pardon, who felt they were in need of it, would open a can of worms about the power of a President, and it would likely go to the Supreme Court. Delay, delay, delay.

By the time it worked its way through the courts, the Republicans might be taking over and they'll start investigating the 1/6 Committee and trying to muddy the waters. Our time might be short, so we have to work double time to get the work done. I agree it's a good thing he didn't try to do a blanket pardon. He was probably afraid at the time that they would use the 25th Amendment if he tried that.

gab13by13

(21,260 posts)
2. There are a set of rules
Tue Feb 1, 2022, 11:56 AM
Feb 2022

that are supposed to be followed before issuing pardons, but I guess that's just for Democratic presidents to follow.

blm

(113,010 posts)
3. You mean Loser.
Tue Feb 1, 2022, 11:57 AM
Feb 2022

He couldn’t. The narrative they planted at the time was that their protestors were peaceful and it was antifa who rioted.

onenote

(42,585 posts)
7. A blanket pardon likely wouldn't have stopped the investigations.
Tue Feb 1, 2022, 12:43 PM
Feb 2022

Indeed, it would mean that those who received a pardon would not be able to claim a Fifth Amendment right not to give testimony that would incriminate them in federal crimes.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»I do have to mention ONE ...