Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

tenderfoot

(8,426 posts)
Tue Feb 22, 2022, 04:18 PM Feb 2022

A Finnish leftist has a few thoughts about the situation with Russia and Ukraine

Greetings from a Finnish leftist! The international situation has apparently left many people in the English-speaking countries confused. I write this thread in the hopes of sharing a perspective I believe is widely if not unilaterally shared in Finland, most leftists included.

What we see happening in #Ukraine right now is, to put it bluntly, Russian (or more precisely, the Kremlin's) imperialism. If no other evidence convinces you, I beseech you to read a translation of Putin's speech yesterday.

This has very little if anything to do with NATO, and almost everything to do with Putin's desire to reinstate the Russian Empire. He has consistently maintained in public that it was a "mistake" to "allow" the former Soviet republics to become independent.

Now he said out loud that Lenin made an error in 1917 when he let the former Russian territories "go." One of the countries that gained independence from Russia in 1917, by the way, was Finland.

What Putin seems to fear the most, rightly so, is that democratic revolution reaches Moscow. Thus, democracy itself is a threat to him.
He is not really afraid of NATO military forces: we can objectively demonstrate that the deployment of NATO forces to countries close to Russia used to be laughably minuscule before 2014.

Only after Putin's blatant 2008 and 2014 breaches of post-World War II convention of not redrawing the map of Europe with a sword did NATO even step up military deployments. Still, the deployments were mostly cosmetic.

The post-2017 "enhanced forward presence" in the Baltics, for instance, consisted of four battalion task groups. Independent analysts have now counted about 125 similar Russian army groups massing along Ukraine's borders.

The most powerful nuclear weapon states in the world really do not fear an attack by other nation states. But what frightens Putin and his band of kleptocrats is the very real possibility that the Russian people decide to get rid of them.

Democratic, successful countries bordering European Russia are a menace to him personally. They show the Russians an alternative, and can serve as sanctuaries for dissidents that Putin would like to invite for a tea by the window.

This is the reason why Putin is doing his best to undermine the European Union, for instance. He cynically supports the European and American far right, up to and including support from clandestine intelligence services and financial assistance.

Failing Europe would be a boon for Putin, and a divided Europe is a weak Europe whose individual countries can be threatened or corrupted from within.

Putin also controls a formidable propaganda machine, which has been very successful in selling a story of poor Russia being threatened by evil NATO and thus forced to mass the second greatest invasion force seen in Europe since the end of the WW2 - against non-NATO Ukraine.

(I personally cannot see how the Ukrainians even would be responsible for NATO's actions even if the above was true, any more than those wedding parties the U.S. has droned over the years were the responsibility of Al Qaida or the Taleban.)

But in reality, the fact is that NATO has not "enlarged" itself: the fact is that democratic countries close to Russia have wanted to join NATO. I hope you ask yourself: why?

Do you really believe that people in countries like the Baltics are evil warmongers who just want to have a go at the Russians? Or that they are duped by some ominous NATO cabal planning to subjugate the Russians?

Or would a more plausible explanation be that people in countries bordering Russia are genuinely concerned that resurgent Kremlin could do precisely something like they have been doing in Georgia and in Ukraine?

I for one used to oppose NATO membership for Finland. I hoped the Kremlin would stop after the first two overt uses of military force, in 2008 and 2014. It did not do so.

Now I'm among those in Finland who are saying that the facts have changed and the opinions need to change as well. There has been a tremendous outburst of public support for Finland's NATO membership. Because we want to avoid a war.

I firmly believe violence cannot build a sustainable world. But sometimes the democracies need to find their spine. I'm still a reservist in the Finnish army and yesterday I voluntarily reviewed my wartime tasks and mobilization packing list, just in case.

Back in the 1930s, democracies turned their backs on democratic Spain. For years I've wondered, could the history have turned the other way if they hadn't? What if they had shown more solidarity when solidarity was needed?

Even if a war could be avoided by yielding to the Kremlin, I really fear what that would mean for the Nordic social democratic experiment. You see, what "finlandization" actually means is a circumscribed quasi-democracy.

A country that is at the mercy of the Kremlin, like we were during the Cold War, may be overtly democratic, but only as long as the people are wise enough to only choose candidates that are acceptable to the Kremlin.

I could well write another thread this long about the various downsides of finlandization, but I spare you for now. Just consider this: yielding to the Kremlin means that parties and politicians who like the Kremlin gain in power.

Which politicians would those be?

Right now, the nationalistic-conservative far right is the favorite of the Kremlin. More European countries would end up like Hungary, dominated by the far right who proceed to sell off the country's assets, like public health services, to their cronies.

In Finland, our social democracy could effectively end. With it, the experiment to create a sustainable social democracy would suffer, and probably end as well. If the Nordic experiment then fails, what do the left has to offer to the world then?

This is a struggle between democracy and autocracy. I lament that many in the left take the side of autocracy, even though I understand the power of propaganda and the blunders the U.S. for instance has done in the past.

But I hope this thread helps some. If you have any questions, please let me know. Thank you for reading, and in solidarity from Finland!

https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1496047631969234944.html

57 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
A Finnish leftist has a few thoughts about the situation with Russia and Ukraine (Original Post) tenderfoot Feb 2022 OP
An Excellent Piece, Ma'am The Magistrate Feb 2022 #1
Kicking for visability SheltieLover Feb 2022 #2
What's to prevent Ukraine from joining NATO at this point? panader0 Feb 2022 #3
My understanding is that Ukraine has a lot of work to do before Sherman A1 Feb 2022 #5
I have thought about this as well...I believe NATO should have a special session to bring Ukraine in Escurumbele Feb 2022 #29
Regular people don't care enough Diraven Feb 2022 #53
Sorry about the size. A friend of my dad's drew this after the USSR invaded Czechoslovakia in 1968 DFW Feb 2022 #4
It's a little small... hunter Feb 2022 #7
Definitely DFW Feb 2022 #8
He doesn't care if his people starve to death, he has plenty of money and so his cronies Escurumbele Feb 2022 #30
If Putin continues down this path and lives long enough he'll be remembered... hunter Feb 2022 #35
Unless we freeze his oligarchs' offshore money. mahina Feb 2022 #37
Squeeze it up to make it bigger. Captain Zero Feb 2022 #43
It's small but has a big message. Fla Dem Feb 2022 #13
Both maternal and paternal grandparents fled the Carpathian Mountain region in early 1900. sprinkleeninow Feb 2022 #17
larger Celerity Feb 2022 #25
Phone or touch screen squeeze it up Captain Zero Feb 2022 #44
Wow, Herb Block! not fooled Feb 2022 #33
That was well said. maxsolomon Feb 2022 #6
K & R - I hope DUers READ and SHARE this! FakeNoose Feb 2022 #9
That was a very good (and timely) read! Thanks! nt Torchlight Feb 2022 #10
Had Hitler been smacked down when he invaded Poland, WWII might have ended earlier. Lonestarblue Feb 2022 #11
👍 sprinkleeninow Feb 2022 #18
World history would be different if countries like the USA and some in Europe did not sit down Escurumbele Feb 2022 #31
It would have been easier... Postal Grunt Feb 2022 #47
+1, IT TOOK A YEAR for the French to truly mobilize because they thought Hitler WOULD NEVER uponit7771 Feb 2022 #57
"What Putin seems to fear the most, rightly so, is that democratic revolution reaches Moscow." Botany Feb 2022 #12
I'm hoping... SergeStorms Feb 2022 #19
Most salient point among many perfect explanations of "how this?" jaxexpat Feb 2022 #22
KNR for this excellent find. niyad Feb 2022 #14
Answering for corruption if he loses power also a concern, lose everything, wealth, privilege, ... L. Coyote Feb 2022 #15
Nice little cottage. SergeStorms Feb 2022 #20
Imagine if Biden stole $1.5 billion to build a seaside cottage, Republicans would cheer, L. Coyote Feb 2022 #21
😁😁😁😁😁😁 SergeStorms Feb 2022 #23
They'd only cheer if TFG did it geardaddy Feb 2022 #49
Truth, L. Coyote Feb 2022 #50
LOL geardaddy Feb 2022 #55
Great segment. Will take a few sessions to watch it all. Tanks! erronis Feb 2022 #46
Finished watching. I hope we can have one on the US oligarchs also. erronis Feb 2022 #56
Excellent. LoisB Feb 2022 #16
Message auto-removed Name removed Feb 2022 #24
wow, excellent article!!! bluboid Feb 2022 #26
A couple of asides. Finns know what it's like to live under the cloud of a constant menace, Russia. Karadeniz Feb 2022 #27
Kick to read later PatSeg Feb 2022 #28
Thank you very much. Joinfortmill Feb 2022 #32
Our Norwegian friends were very concerned during Trump's tenure. summer_in_TX Feb 2022 #34
100th Rec and a Kick Hekate Feb 2022 #36
Terve! Wicked Blue Feb 2022 #38
Kick and rec. Great post. Scrivener7 Feb 2022 #39
Good Perspective Mr. Steve Feb 2022 #40
HOPE DU KEEPS THIS UP ALL DAY! McKim Feb 2022 #41
Excellent post! Thanks for sharing! denvine Feb 2022 #42
K&R Wild blueberry Feb 2022 #45
Exactly. NATO's failure to expand *enough* radius777 Feb 2022 #48
Important perspective Diraven Feb 2022 #51
Good read. Thanks! liberalla Feb 2022 #52
Translation of Putin's speech: Ghost Dog Feb 2022 #54

panader0

(25,816 posts)
3. What's to prevent Ukraine from joining NATO at this point?
Tue Feb 22, 2022, 04:33 PM
Feb 2022

Curious about the pros and cons of such a move.

Sherman A1

(38,958 posts)
5. My understanding is that Ukraine has a lot of work to do before
Tue Feb 22, 2022, 04:40 PM
Feb 2022

NATO would consider admitting it as a member state. They have an ongoing border dispute, internal corruption among other issues. I also understand that a vote to admit any country must be unanimous so that is a tough sell in the best of times, which of course this isn't .

Escurumbele

(3,386 posts)
29. I have thought about this as well...I believe NATO should have a special session to bring Ukraine in
Tue Feb 22, 2022, 06:50 PM
Feb 2022

Although I also find difficult to believe, or accept, that because Ukraine is not part of NATO that NATO cannot get involved in defending them.

-1 X -1 = 1

What the hell is a simple math problem doing here? Well, it is synonymous of "one-negative-wrong x one-negative-wrong = one-right".

What Putin is doing is planning a negative action, an invasion, why does NATO, or the USA have to abide to anything?

There are two options, and the 2nd one Biden should have done already:

Option 1: NATO allows Ukraine to join bypassing all the other crap they are requesting.
Option 2: The USA sends 100,000 troops and a lot of weapons, Germany and other powers also send a ton of troops and weapons making the number much greater than what Putin has. Its like bringing your huge brother to a fight against a bully, the fight never takes place, the bully goes home.

It doesn't make sense that the World is going to sit and watch while massacres are allowed to take place in a country that has not provoked Russia or anyone else. To do nothing is to be complicit.

DFW

(54,349 posts)
4. Sorry about the size. A friend of my dad's drew this after the USSR invaded Czechoslovakia in 1968
Tue Feb 22, 2022, 04:36 PM
Feb 2022


How little things change...............

hunter

(38,310 posts)
7. It's a little small...
Tue Feb 22, 2022, 05:03 PM
Feb 2022

... but yeah.

On the other hand I think Putin has underestimated the economic blow-back.

The 21st century world economy works around these sorts of disruptions, usually by isolating the disruptors.

Maybe that's just hopeful thinking.

DFW

(54,349 posts)
8. Definitely
Tue Feb 22, 2022, 05:09 PM
Feb 2022

CZ was still part of the Warsaw Pact. They were going to remain socialist (or whatever passed for that) no matter what. The only question was how much leeway they would be allowed. The apparent answer was "nowhere near what you want," and they were shown it in no uncertain terms.

Escurumbele

(3,386 posts)
30. He doesn't care if his people starve to death, he has plenty of money and so his cronies
Tue Feb 22, 2022, 06:53 PM
Feb 2022

This is not about Russia, it is about Putin, he dreams of history labeling him as "Putin The Great", he is as narcissistic as his pupil trump.

hunter

(38,310 posts)
35. If Putin continues down this path and lives long enough he'll be remembered...
Tue Feb 22, 2022, 07:43 PM
Feb 2022

... as the guy who sold Siberia to China.

mahina

(17,646 posts)
37. Unless we freeze his oligarchs' offshore money.
Tue Feb 22, 2022, 08:04 PM
Feb 2022

Not that I have the first clue how that would be accomplished but I understand it’s the majority of their assets

sprinkleeninow

(20,237 posts)
17. Both maternal and paternal grandparents fled the Carpathian Mountain region in early 1900.
Tue Feb 22, 2022, 06:02 PM
Feb 2022

Thanks be...

Lonestarblue

(9,971 posts)
11. Had Hitler been smacked down when he invaded Poland, WWII might have ended earlier.
Tue Feb 22, 2022, 05:54 PM
Feb 2022

Putin is doing the same. He is testing the strength of the West’s leaders and how far they’re willing to go to protect Ukraine. His claims about fear for Russia’s national security are so much BS. No one is even slightly interested in invading Russia. This is all about Putin rebuilding the USSR to its former glory when he was a KGB thug. If he is allowed to annex Ukraine, no former part of the USSR is safe.

Escurumbele

(3,386 posts)
31. World history would be different if countries like the USA and some in Europe did not sit down
Tue Feb 22, 2022, 06:56 PM
Feb 2022

to watch for fear of breaking international laws that were being broken by the aggressors, it doesn't make sense, it is infuriating. How can the World sit down and watch because of technicalities? If someone is ding wrong, then step out of the box and stop the aggressor, it is as simple as that, forget about the protocol because the criminal doesn't care a crap about protocol.

Postal Grunt

(215 posts)
47. It would have been easier...
Wed Feb 23, 2022, 02:27 PM
Feb 2022

when Hitler sent his troops to resume their presence on the West bank of the Rhine in 1936. As part of the Treaty of Versailles, the German military was prevented from having a presence on the West bank. At that time, the German armed forces hadn't been completely re-armed and at the strength in manpower that they would have in the beginning of WW2. The combined armed forces of England and France could have put an end to Hitler's move if the politicians of both countries had some foresight. However, it was during the Great Depression when funds were short, the memory of a generation of men and leadership that had been lost was still fresh, the French had put their faith in the Maginot Line, and there was little appetite for more losses.

After that, Hitler set the stage for his attempt at domination of Europe.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Remilitarization_of_the_Rhineland

uponit7771

(90,335 posts)
57. +1, IT TOOK A YEAR for the French to truly mobilize because they thought Hitler WOULD NEVER
Thu Feb 24, 2022, 06:31 PM
Feb 2022

... attack them.

NATO is mobilized now, I think that's the part of history we're NOT repeating

SergeStorms

(19,193 posts)
19. I'm hoping...
Tue Feb 22, 2022, 06:07 PM
Feb 2022

that many Russians are not accepting Putin's bullshit at face value. They should know by now that Putin has only his enrichment in mind, and couldn't give a shit about the people of Russia.

Russia needs another revolution, and soon.

jaxexpat

(6,818 posts)
22. Most salient point among many perfect explanations of "how this?"
Tue Feb 22, 2022, 06:15 PM
Feb 2022

Big question is will the west discover philosophical cohesion? Feel their righteousness with enough sincerity to act as one against "Putinism". It's the authoritarianism, everyone's real enemy.

L. Coyote

(51,129 posts)
21. Imagine if Biden stole $1.5 billion to build a seaside cottage, Republicans would cheer,
Tue Feb 22, 2022, 06:12 PM
Feb 2022

"That's our kind of president."

erronis

(15,241 posts)
56. Finished watching. I hope we can have one on the US oligarchs also.
Thu Feb 24, 2022, 06:23 PM
Feb 2022

I was expecting the linkages between all of the russian crooks to include references to the US ones (trump, repuglicons, lobbyists, etc.)

Response to tenderfoot (Original post)

Karadeniz

(22,506 posts)
27. A couple of asides. Finns know what it's like to live under the cloud of a constant menace, Russia.
Tue Feb 22, 2022, 06:43 PM
Feb 2022

Many years ago doctors decided to learn why Finns had such an abnormal heart attack rate. Diet, lifestyle, exercise, ancestry. Nope. It finally turned out to be stress and the stressor was living right next to a country they didn't trust to not invade them without cause. Second, Putin's excuse of protecting Russians is only several thousand years old. It's the old excuse the Romans used to justify their bit by bit takeover of neighbors on the peninsula. First they had to protect the original Romans by taking over a contiguous land. When Romans then moved into the new territory of course they had to be protected, so they claimed more new land. Putin is hardly original.

summer_in_TX

(2,733 posts)
34. Our Norwegian friends were very concerned during Trump's tenure.
Tue Feb 22, 2022, 07:16 PM
Feb 2022

His efforts to walk away from NATO shocked them. They've had a long history, like the Finns have, of dealing with Russian aggression. There is often Russian submarine within Norway's territorial waters keeping them on edge.

They very much hope that America will continue to play its post-WWII role of working to ensure peace in Europe.

An empire-hungry Putin threatens peace and stability throughout Europe and most especially for every country that borders Russia.

Wicked Blue

(5,831 posts)
38. Terve!
Tue Feb 22, 2022, 09:28 PM
Feb 2022

Hea kiri. Mu vanemad olid eestist.

In addition to worrying about the safety and independence of Ukraine and other eastern European democracies, my biggest concern is the treasonous propaganda Putin has insinuated into the Republican Party through Trump and others.

McKim

(2,412 posts)
41. HOPE DU KEEPS THIS UP ALL DAY!
Wed Feb 23, 2022, 11:03 AM
Feb 2022

I hope that Du keeps this up on the page all day! It is very very helpful to view this from a Leftist perspective. Now I see that it is way more than dick waving by international leaders who just want to look tough to the folks back home and feed the MIC. This is a line in the sand. There has been what feels like a big cut off between the US and international perspectives in the past decade. We need to hear from Europeans more to get multiple ideas and points of view. Thanks from the bottom of my heart for posting this!

radius777

(3,635 posts)
48. Exactly. NATO's failure to expand *enough*
Wed Feb 23, 2022, 02:51 PM
Feb 2022

to include Georgia and Ukraine many years ago, is what is causing this current conflict.

You don't see Putin threatening any former Soviet state that is now a member of NATO, do you?

Unfortunately many in the West (either intentionally or unwittingly) have bought into the 'poor victimized Russia/bad NATO' Kremlin narrative.

It is the West that put Russia back on solid ground when they imploded under the weight of their own contradictions. We nursed them back to life - which was stupid. We should've shrunk Russia and its influence as much as possible and pushed them harder towards democracy.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»A Finnish leftist has a f...