Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
42 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Some good news on Russian convoys: (Original Post) Tomconroy Mar 2022 OP
That is good news True Dough Mar 2022 #1
Right? lagomorph777 Mar 2022 #3
This looks significant although I suspect the Rooskies have alot more coming. honest.abe Mar 2022 #2
The Russians have never been good at logistics. Happy Hoosier Mar 2022 #14
Interesting but I suppose not surprising they would value "head" over "tail". honest.abe Mar 2022 #16
Possibly. And it feeds the Russian doctrine of overwhelming force. Happy Hoosier Mar 2022 #22
Yes, that totally makes sense as well. honest.abe Mar 2022 #27
You can't get far without gasoline COL Mustard Mar 2022 #17
That 40 mile long convoy Mr. Evil Mar 2022 #4
I don't get why that hasn't happened yet. groundloop Mar 2022 #6
I'm no military strategist but, Mr. Evil Mar 2022 #9
I think snow is in the forecast DenaliDemocrat Mar 2022 #11
Unfortunately, the Russians know that they control the air space AdamGG Mar 2022 #7
My understanding is that they're about 15-20 miles north of Kiev. Mr. Evil Mar 2022 #10
For one, it is NOT a 40-mile-long convoy. Two, fog of war? L. Coyote Mar 2022 #13
Just going by what's been reported. Mr. Evil Mar 2022 #20
Good illustration of the "fog of war" problem. Verify, do not trust. L. Coyote Mar 2022 #24
MSNBC just reported last hr "40 mile long convoy" oldsoftie Mar 2022 #29
Yes, and that is simply false. L. Coyote Mar 2022 #33
I was thinking this morning that it sounded kinda crazy big oldsoftie Mar 2022 #36
Misinformation becomes "fact" when repeated. jaxexpat Mar 2022 #37
Thanks for the link KS Toronado Mar 2022 #23
May be a fiction. Aeschylus -- 'In war, truth is the first casualty.' yellowcanine Mar 2022 #21
And lies are the first weapon. Mr. Evil Mar 2022 #25
It was never a 40 mile long convoy. PoindexterOglethorpe Mar 2022 #34
BBC World News just had an expert on that explained that Native Mar 2022 #35
Well, shit. Mr. Evil Mar 2022 #41
The newscaster was surprised at this as well. Said it was the first time he'd heard that. Native Mar 2022 #42
Remember the road out of Kuwait ? eppur_se_muova Mar 2022 #39
K&R liberalla Mar 2022 #5
This is classic partisan warfare. Avoid the armed units and cut their supply lines. Beastly Boy Mar 2022 #8
Ukraine needs a few dozen missle-carrying drones. Cyrano Mar 2022 #12
Every foot past the Russian border is behind Russian lines. Old Crank Mar 2022 #15
Reverse your last sentence and you're probably more correct COL Mustard Mar 2022 #19
Wolverines! roamer65 Mar 2022 #18
Redux Marcuse Mar 2022 #26
The effectiveness of the A-10 & attack helicopters is amazing. oldsoftie Mar 2022 #30
At the background Pentagon press briefing this morning Tomconroy Mar 2022 #28
We need to do more Joinfortmill Mar 2022 #31
Get the gas truck and it all stops. Historic NY Mar 2022 #32
Excellent. Demovictory9 Mar 2022 #38
Plus, I've seen two different videos of different tractors towing off tanks csziggy Mar 2022 #40

honest.abe

(8,659 posts)
2. This looks significant although I suspect the Rooskies have alot more coming.
Tue Mar 1, 2022, 12:27 PM
Mar 2022

Just a warning.. at least one of the videos shows a dead Russian soldier that is rather disturbing.

Happy Hoosier

(7,277 posts)
14. The Russians have never been good at logistics.
Tue Mar 1, 2022, 01:36 PM
Mar 2022

A couple of Russologists have noted that Russian military doctrine has always emphasized "head" over "tail." and frankly a bits odd since any serious military strategist will tell you that logistics matters more than anything.

But logistics are hard. Timing and coordinating logistical elements to be close enough to combat elements to provide resupply when needed but not vulnerable to enemy interdiction is what separates the pros from the wannabes. Even the U.S. which arguablly has the most sophisticated logistics system in the world sometimes blows it.

Couple that with shitty morale in the Russian Army and it is a volatile arrangement. There is nothing scarier to a tanker than being stuck, unable to move, because they are out of fuel. Add in food shortages and the picture can turn ugly quickly. Even U.S. sources are now saying there is considerable evidence of some Russian units surrendering without a fight. They don;t want to be meat for Putin's grinder, and they don't want to kill Ukrainians.

honest.abe

(8,659 posts)
16. Interesting but I suppose not surprising they would value "head" over "tail".
Tue Mar 1, 2022, 01:45 PM
Mar 2022

Probably just an arrogant macho thing to dismiss the boring less glamourous support functions.

Happy Hoosier

(7,277 posts)
22. Possibly. And it feeds the Russian doctrine of overwhelming force.
Tue Mar 1, 2022, 01:54 PM
Mar 2022

Back in the Cold War there were frequent discussion of quality vs quantity. There was a general acknowledgment that Western forces were of better quality, both in equipment and training, but the counter argument was that "quantity is a quality all its own."

In WWII, the Russians defeated the technically and tactically superior Nazis with sheer quantity. They literally threw bodies and equipment at the Nazis until they were overwhelmed. When fighting defensively, this is not that much of a logistical challenge. On the advance, it's much harder. But by the time the Soviets were advancing on the Nazis, they Nazis were already pretty much beaten up and the Russians were passing through areas where their supply lines were not really at risk from partisan attacks.

The situation the Russians are facing now is not something they have very much experience with. They attempting a massive advancement through unfriendly territory against a foe that is highly motivated to resist.

They have massive force and could still yet prevail, but the weaknesses in the fabric of their forces are very apparent. I guarantee you the Pentagon is working overtime analyzing every aspect of this debacle and feeding that information right to the Ukrainians.

COL Mustard

(5,896 posts)
17. You can't get far without gasoline
Tue Mar 1, 2022, 01:45 PM
Mar 2022

Patton wanted 400,000 gallons a day in 1944. It ain't better today.

And fuel trucks are relatively easy to knock out. There's your Molotov cocktail, comrade!

Mr. Evil

(2,839 posts)
4. That 40 mile long convoy
Tue Mar 1, 2022, 01:07 PM
Mar 2022

of Russian personnel and armaments approaching Ukraine is an air force commander's dream. It could easily be turned into a 40 mile long swath of destruction.

groundloop

(11,518 posts)
6. I don't get why that hasn't happened yet.
Tue Mar 1, 2022, 01:10 PM
Mar 2022

It seems that a few well placed cruise missiles or drone strikes would render that convoy dead in the water.

DenaliDemocrat

(1,475 posts)
11. I think snow is in the forecast
Tue Mar 1, 2022, 01:31 PM
Mar 2022

Probably waiting for low cloud cover to give some protection and then hammer them hard.

AdamGG

(1,288 posts)
7. Unfortunately, the Russians know that they control the air space
Tue Mar 1, 2022, 01:11 PM
Mar 2022

which is probably why they're willing to use this formation.

Mr. Evil

(2,839 posts)
10. My understanding is that they're about 15-20 miles north of Kiev.
Tue Mar 1, 2022, 01:29 PM
Mar 2022

Which is still Ukrainian airspace. It would be a good opportunity to show the Russians that they only think they control the airspace. They're sitting ducks and a huge opportunity to take a giant shit on the Russians will be sadly missed. Drones maybe? Javelins? Cruise missiles?

L. Coyote

(51,129 posts)
13. For one, it is NOT a 40-mile-long convoy. Two, fog of war?
Tue Mar 1, 2022, 01:33 PM
Mar 2022

They were 40 miles from Kyiv when it was parked and 3.5 miles long. When it began moving it stretched out some 17 km.

Russian military convoy stretches over 17 miles north of Kiev.

L. Coyote

(51,129 posts)
24. Good illustration of the "fog of war" problem. Verify, do not trust.
Tue Mar 1, 2022, 01:57 PM
Mar 2022

And it was quite easy to verify by looking at the satellite photos. Apparently, no one in the major US outlets is taking the time to do so, they are repeating propaganda. Congress is making a major decision about aid to Ukraine while this false information is being treated as fact. That is a problem.

oldsoftie

(12,523 posts)
36. I was thinking this morning that it sounded kinda crazy big
Tue Mar 1, 2022, 03:22 PM
Mar 2022

40 MILES would have to be thousands of vehicles
Being smaller would explain why it hasn't already been attacked

jaxexpat

(6,815 posts)
37. Misinformation becomes "fact" when repeated.
Tue Mar 1, 2022, 03:26 PM
Mar 2022

When asked for substantiation of his assertions re: Saddam's WMD's, Dick Cheney quoted the NY Times to support his justification for the Bush Co. Iraq war push. The Times had previously written about the things Cheney had been saying, soooooo Cheney just referenced the NY Times quoting him. Aaaaaand suddenly, it became a brand-new baby FACT (a NY Times fact, have a cigar). It became obvious then, to anyone paying attention, that people can be just as stupid as you want them to be.

That convoy could have been a film crew for a war re-enactment.............Right? I mean it was dark. What's the difference between a kilometer and a mile among friends, after all? Heck, they looked Russian. How did the 17 mile number come up? Some guy thinks that it took about an hour for them to pass him and they appeared to be going about 17 mph, sooooooo, there you go. Were they bumper to bumper? Were they using both southbound lanes? Did they look grim and determined or scared and pensive? or maybe sad like, maybe on the verge of tears. They seemed hungry, they looked hungry. The reporter said HE had been hungry, earlier but he ate a bit and it got better.

Fog of war vs the pettifoggery of peace. Which grabs the most headlines or keeps the attention span? Pat "700 Club" Robinson figures Putin must be the anti-Christ for Christ's sake. Well, that's one we can check off.

Mr. Evil

(2,839 posts)
25. And lies are the first weapon.
Tue Mar 1, 2022, 02:00 PM
Mar 2022

Putin: We're denazifying Ukraine.

Sure thing Pootie. You attack a sovereign nation without provocation just like Hitler did with Poland and France and Ukraine are the Nazi's. What a fuck-ton load of bullshit!

Native

(5,939 posts)
35. BBC World News just had an expert on that explained that
Tue Mar 1, 2022, 03:07 PM
Mar 2022

It has to do with the type of aircraft the Ukrainians have. They don't have the smart guided missiles, so they would have to get in really low to hit their targets, and the convoy has ground to air missiles that would take them out quite easily. It basically would make no sense for the Ukrainians to attack from the air.

Mr. Evil

(2,839 posts)
41. Well, shit.
Tue Mar 1, 2022, 06:01 PM
Mar 2022

I didn't really know the capabilities of their air power. That just sucks. Thanx for the info.

Beastly Boy

(9,293 posts)
8. This is classic partisan warfare. Avoid the armed units and cut their supply lines.
Tue Mar 1, 2022, 01:12 PM
Mar 2022

It already began, and this is something that Russian invaders can expect for as long as they stay in Ukraine.

Cyrano

(15,031 posts)
12. Ukraine needs a few dozen missle-carrying drones.
Tue Mar 1, 2022, 01:31 PM
Mar 2022

I mean, really. How long would it take us to get these effective weapons to them?

Such drones could almost immediately render Russian tanks and armored vehicles useless. And they wouldn't even need to target the Russians. All they'd need to do is destroy the roads ahead of them. (Tanks and any vehicles with treads don't do well in mud.)

Why haven't we done this? Why aren't we doing it now (and so much more).

The Russian military seems to be a Potemkin Army. (Google Potemkin. It's an empty facade to hide that there's no there there.)

Now, Putin is trying to use his "nuclear card." A country with nuclear weapons has no need to mention that. Seems Vlad is becoming aware that he's fucked up. So there's only one question left. Is he crazy enough to actually start a nuclear war in which there are no winners?

Old Crank

(3,564 posts)
15. Every foot past the Russian border is behind Russian lines.
Tue Mar 1, 2022, 01:38 PM
Mar 2022

They can be attacked and dogged from all sides once they cross the boarder.

Wonder how m any generals will be sent packing by Putin after this botch job.

COL Mustard

(5,896 posts)
19. Reverse your last sentence and you're probably more correct
Tue Mar 1, 2022, 01:48 PM
Mar 2022

Wonder how many generals will send Putin packing after this botch job.

oldsoftie

(12,523 posts)
30. The effectiveness of the A-10 & attack helicopters is amazing.
Tue Mar 1, 2022, 02:10 PM
Mar 2022

We have the best pilots in the world

 

Tomconroy

(7,611 posts)
28. At the background Pentagon press briefing this morning
Tue Mar 1, 2022, 02:08 PM
Mar 2022

They said the big convoy hasn't moved for over a day. It's 30km from Kyiv.

csziggy

(34,135 posts)
40. Plus, I've seen two different videos of different tractors towing off tanks
Tue Mar 1, 2022, 05:03 PM
Mar 2022

Regular old farm tractors tooling down the road with tanks is not something I ever expected to see!

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Some good news on Russian...