Create new account | My Profile | My Account | My Bookmarks | My Inbox | Help | Log in

Google search

Advanced search

HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Main » General Discussion (Forum) » I think Biden needs to ap...

Fri Mar 25, 2022, 12:08 PM

Marius25 (2,352 posts)

I think Biden needs to appoint a new AG

I know some people like him, but I just don't have confidence in Garland.

Trump just got away with his crimes yet again in New York, so New York will not hold him accountable.

The fact that he hasn't been arrested yet by the Feds is insane. They've had years to make sure everything is correct.

And now we have the wife of a sitting Supreme Court justice engaging in seditious conspiracy with Trump's Chief of Staff to overthrow Democracy on behalf of the orange wanna-be Putin, and the Supreme Court justice voted on a case in favor of hiding evidence of the insurrection.

And not a single thing will happen to any of them.

There is no rule of law in America anymore.

19 replies, 1142 views

Thread infoBookmark this threadTrash this thread

Reply to this thread

Back to top Alert abuse

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 19 replies Author Time Post
Reply I think Biden needs to appoint a new AG (Original post)
 Marius25 Mar 2022 OP
LineReply Good gawd.
 we can do it Mar 2022 #1
LineReply Be sure to let him know.
 Ocelot II Mar 2022 #2
LineReply Not yet, If garland does nothing after the open hearings, then hell yes.
 fightforfreedom Mar 2022 #3
LineLineReply He's not supposed to wait for Congress to do his job for him.
 lagomorph777 Mar 2022 #7
LineReply Well, then. Have you notified President Biden about your thinking?
 MineralMan Mar 2022 #4
LineReply What bothers me more is that he has not put any teeth to all the contempt citations from congress.
 bullimiami Mar 2022 #5
LineReply Time's up. If he can't bring a case 15 months later, with terabytes of video evidence,
 lagomorph777 Mar 2022 #6
LineReply You're only allowed to post about "AG" Garland if you're an expert.
 Alpeduez21 Mar 2022 #8
LineReply A new AG isn't going to fix what ails the DOJ...
 RockRaven Mar 2022 #9
LineNew Reply Hope Biden resists the calls for ousting Garland over trump. That would be a shame and trump victory
 Hoyt Mar 2022 #10
LineLineNew Reply You didn't read any of their text messages did you?
 Marius25 Mar 2022 #12
LineLineLineNew Reply Yes I did. She was involved in the Washington protests, that were not illegal. None of the emails
 Hoyt Mar 2022 #13
LineLineLineLineNew Reply She was involved with working with the Chief of Staff to
 Marius25 Mar 2022 #14
LineLineLineLineLineNew Reply Do you think Reps Raskin, McGovern, Jayapal, Lee, etc. were involved in sedition when they contested
 Hoyt Mar 2022 #15
LineLineLineLineLineLineNew Reply Ginni Thomas didn't just disagree with the results.
 Marius25 Mar 2022 #16
LineLineLineLineLineLineLineNew Reply Where? As can be seen from 01/6/2017, it is not illegal to challenge election. Storming Capitol is.
 Hoyt Mar 2022 #17
LineNew Reply It is time for three NBC reporters to revisit this story from 11/2020
 Grasswire2 Mar 2022 #11
LineNew Reply The tiny shred of hope I am holding on to
 Bettie Mar 2022 #18
LineNew Reply These cases are not like a car accident, it takes a long time to build a strong case
 Lettuce Be Mar 2022 #19

Response to Marius25 (Original post)

Fri Mar 25, 2022, 12:10 PM

Star Member we can do it (11,406 posts)

1. Good gawd.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Response to Marius25 (Original post)

Fri Mar 25, 2022, 12:11 PM

Star Member Ocelot II (108,804 posts)

2. Be sure to let him know.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Response to Marius25 (Original post)

Fri Mar 25, 2022, 12:12 PM

fightforfreedom (4,913 posts)

3. Not yet, If garland does nothing after the open hearings, then hell yes.

 

The committee is going to prove there was a major conspiracy to overturn the election. They will make recommendations to Garland to investigate , indict people. If Garland does not respond Biden should remove him.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Response to fightforfreedom (Reply #3)

Fri Mar 25, 2022, 12:21 PM

lagomorph777 (30,613 posts)

7. He's not supposed to wait for Congress to do his job for him.

He has tens of thousands of investigators under his command.

Congress has a couple dozen lawyers.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Response to Marius25 (Original post)

Fri Mar 25, 2022, 12:12 PM

Star Member MineralMan (145,255 posts)

4. Well, then. Have you notified President Biden about your thinking?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Response to Marius25 (Original post)

Fri Mar 25, 2022, 12:18 PM

Star Member bullimiami (12,355 posts)

5. What bothers me more is that he has not put any teeth to all the contempt citations from congress.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Response to Marius25 (Original post)

Fri Mar 25, 2022, 12:20 PM

lagomorph777 (30,613 posts)

6. Time's up. If he can't bring a case 15 months later, with terabytes of video evidence,

he's part of the problem.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Response to Marius25 (Original post)

Fri Mar 25, 2022, 12:24 PM

Alpeduez21 (1,474 posts)

8. You're only allowed to post about "AG" Garland if you're an expert.

Otherwise it has to be glowing recommendations about how great he is and how lucky we are to have such a do nothing dent in a chair at the helm of the justice department.

I agree with you wholeheartedly. The threats to america are VERY real and VERY immediate. Maybe I'll be surprised but I doubt it. There is just no chatter anywhere about motions being filed or witnesses going into buildings that could indicate something. Fucking Gaetz is still being his congressional child molesting self and not shit has happened. Wish I could be treated so generously by the system should the need arise.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Response to Marius25 (Original post)

Fri Mar 25, 2022, 12:30 PM

RockRaven (12,840 posts)

9. A new AG isn't going to fix what ails the DOJ...

Replacing Garland would merely give the appearance of doing something different while not accomplishing anything.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Response to Marius25 (Original post)

Fri Mar 25, 2022, 12:32 PM

Hoyt (54,770 posts)

10. Hope Biden resists the calls for ousting Garland over trump. That would be a shame and trump victory

 


Also, I have yet to see any evidence that Thomas' wife engaged in the insurrection at the Capitol. If so, lock her and Meadows up. It does appear she wanted the election results questioned, just like we wanted the election results questioned after trump won.

If you have that evidence, please post it. I will change my mind if she was directly involved in storming the Capitol.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Response to Marius25 (Reply #12)

Fri Mar 25, 2022, 01:03 PM

Hoyt (54,770 posts)

13. Yes I did. She was involved in the Washington protests, that were not illegal. None of the emails

 

indicate she was involved in storming the Capitol. If you have an email that shows that, please post it.

There were two aspects on Jan 6.

1. A protest march that was scheduled in mid-December. The protest was stupid, but not illegal.

2. Storming the Capitol, which was illegal.


Please show me where she was involved in # 2. I'll change my mind with that evidence. Also, send it to Garland because he has been prosecuting the insurrectionists for months.

Finally, we all detest Clarence Thomas. But I'm not for saddling anyone with what their spouse does.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Response to Hoyt (Reply #13)

Fri Mar 25, 2022, 01:06 PM

Marius25 (2,352 posts)

14. She was involved with working with the Chief of Staff to

overthrow the results, and her Supreme Court justice husband helped with that.

That's called seditious conspiracy.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Response to Marius25 (Reply #14)

Fri Mar 25, 2022, 01:14 PM

Hoyt (54,770 posts)

15. Do you think Reps Raskin, McGovern, Jayapal, Lee, etc. were involved in sedition when they contested

 

2016 election before then VP Joe Biden? I dang sure don't. Now, if they had stormed the Capitol, that's illegal


https://www.politico.com/story/2017/01/no-trump-electoral-college-challenge-233294





BTW, wish they had been successful challenging trump's election.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Response to Hoyt (Reply #15)

Fri Mar 25, 2022, 01:20 PM

Marius25 (2,352 posts)

16. Ginni Thomas didn't just disagree with the results.

She tried to overturn them based on no evidence.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Response to Marius25 (Reply #16)

Fri Mar 25, 2022, 01:22 PM

Hoyt (54,770 posts)

17. Where? As can be seen from 01/6/2017, it is not illegal to challenge election. Storming Capitol is.

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Response to Marius25 (Original post)

Fri Mar 25, 2022, 12:36 PM

Star Member Grasswire2 (13,033 posts)

11. It is time for three NBC reporters to revisit this story from 11/2020

It may very well be Biden's stated philosophy and way of holding Republicans accountable stated in the article that allows him to proceed with the domestic agenda.

I support Biden. I'm very happy he was elected.

But this really needs to be cleared up. And these reporters could go back and ask him if this philosophy or policy has changed, knowing what we all know now about the plot to transform America into an autocratic state through violent overthrow of the government -- a plot planned and still afoot today.

The American people deserve to know the president's policy/philosophy as it is today.

]https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/justice-department/president-elect-biden-wary-trump-focused-investigations-sources-say-n1247959?msclkid=49c9de3aa7bc11ec88a919028c198773

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Response to Marius25 (Original post)

Fri Mar 25, 2022, 01:23 PM

Star Member Bettie (14,956 posts)

18. The tiny shred of hope I am holding on to

is that there were zero leaks about the Enrique Tarrio arrest.

So, maybe there is something happening and they are keeping a tight lid on it.

But, no is probably more likely. Still, I'm trying to hold on to the one tiny bit of hope, even though it is so awful when it is snuffed out.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Response to Marius25 (Original post)

Fri Mar 25, 2022, 05:18 PM

Star Member Lettuce Be (2,246 posts)

19. These cases are not like a car accident, it takes a long time to build a strong case

Garland is doing his work. Let him do it.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Reply to this thread

General Discussion (Forum)
DU Home | Latest Threads | Greatest Threads | Forums & Groups | My Subscriptions | My Posts

About | Copyright | Privacy | Terms of service | Contact

In Memoriam

© 2001 - 2023 Democratic Underground, LLC. Thank you for visiting.