Mon Apr 25, 2022, 04:31 PM
Laura PourMeADrink (39,035 posts)
Trump held in contempt by NY judgeLast edited Mon Apr 25, 2022, 05:06 PM - Edit history (1) Link to tweet ?s=20&t=62-R3yT5M7946uNE95ULFQ
|
12 replies, 582 views
![]() |
Author | Time | Post |
![]() |
Laura PourMeADrink | Apr 2022 | OP |
Torchlight | Apr 2022 | #1 | |
jimfields33 | Apr 2022 | #4 | |
Laura PourMeADrink | Apr 2022 | #6 | |
Blue Owl | Apr 2022 | #2 | |
Hortensis | Apr 2022 | #3 | |
Laura PourMeADrink | Apr 2022 | #7 | |
Emile | Apr 2022 | #11 | |
Laura PourMeADrink | Apr 2022 | #12 | |
tblue37 | Apr 2022 | #5 | |
lindysalsagal | Apr 2022 | #8 | |
Wounded Bear | Apr 2022 | #9 | |
Emile | Apr 2022 | #10 |
Response to Laura PourMeADrink (Original post)
Mon Apr 25, 2022, 04:33 PM
Torchlight (1,412 posts)
1. Can liens be placed on any of his assets should he choose to deny payment? nt
Response to Torchlight (Reply #1)
Mon Apr 25, 2022, 04:49 PM
jimfields33 (10,549 posts)
4. It's 3.65 million for a year. I bet he holds out until next year.
Response to jimfields33 (Reply #4)
Mon Apr 25, 2022, 05:03 PM
Laura PourMeADrink (39,035 posts)
6. Probably putting together a "Oh poor me fundraiser" now
Response to Laura PourMeADrink (Original post)
Mon Apr 25, 2022, 04:36 PM
Blue Owl (41,008 posts)
2. Contrumpt
Response to Laura PourMeADrink (Original post)
Mon Apr 25, 2022, 04:40 PM
Hortensis (52,723 posts)
3. "Official" contempt, instead of just the humanity-wide unofficial.
All right...! It's official.
![]() |
Response to Hortensis (Reply #3)
Mon Apr 25, 2022, 10:51 PM
Laura PourMeADrink (39,035 posts)
7. Thank you. Can't believe this isn't huge news here. Yikes
We wait and wait and complain and here's a judge that slammed him...
|
Response to Laura PourMeADrink (Reply #7)
Tue Apr 26, 2022, 12:01 PM
Emile (6,845 posts)
11. I been preaching contempt for Marjorie Taylor Greene
since last Friday. Then this news comes out and somehow I think I was right. This is great news!
|
Response to Emile (Reply #11)
Tue Apr 26, 2022, 12:26 PM
Laura PourMeADrink (39,035 posts)
12. I used to think contempt & censure was not enough
Now I think at least it's something. Something for the record something for the history books
|
Response to Laura PourMeADrink (Original post)
Mon Apr 25, 2022, 04:53 PM
tblue37 (54,543 posts)
5. I know I hold him in contempt.
Response to Laura PourMeADrink (Original post)
Mon Apr 25, 2022, 11:29 PM
lindysalsagal (17,082 posts)
8. This deserves far more attention than it's gottten on Du today!
This really matters, and if he never surrenders the evidence, the Dems can use it that he's hiding things in the mid-term ads and the 2024 ads. Plus it could give the hearings a boost and congress a reason to try to keep him off ballots.
|
Response to Laura PourMeADrink (Original post)
Mon Apr 25, 2022, 11:37 PM
Wounded Bear (52,198 posts)
9. I'm not surprised. I have nothing but contempt for him...
![]() |
Response to Laura PourMeADrink (Original post)
Tue Apr 26, 2022, 07:59 AM
Emile (6,845 posts)
10. Apparently this judge didn't take great pains to protect
the rights of defendant. I learned that on DU in the Marjorie Taylor Greene discovery.
|