And it's clear he simply didn't agree with it.
I put a link to the transcript in a post above. It's mind-numbing to read his word salad but it's clear he knew he lost Georgia but didn't accept it, several people told him that the data were right and there was no fraud, and then he got threatening. That phone call must have lasted way too long - it took a long time to read it - and near the end of it Raffensberger was essentially saying he'd look into it just to shut him up. But this is also after telling him several times they had already done some investigations and did not see any of the things the motherfucker was throwing at them. I mean, he was like a kid saying the dog ate his homework, it was so blatantly ridiculous. He had nothing solid for his accusations, and indeed, Raffensberger said that when proof was investigated, none was found. He shot him down left and right and he wouldn't accept any of it. Just kept on with the dog ate the ballots. Or something.
I do think this is probably the clearest criminal case amongst all his criminality while in office, but I still don't know whether it will convince a jury. Sometimes juries hang up on the stupidest of things.
And I hate that grand juries often don't indict if they don't think it's a slam dunk case, but there's always that to worry about as well.
= new reply since forum marked as read
