The right wing media are outraged with the SCOTUS leak.

[The Grand Illuminist]

It seems they are determined to find out who leaked (in reality, whistle blew) the RvW opinion.

[Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin]

1. Fawk 'em

[Maine Abu El Banat]

4. All in the name of God

[mitch96]

13. Always a good "get out of jail free" card."GOD WILLS IT".yeah right.who interpreted

what "god" wills or not..
m

[uponit7771]

3. K&R, they know their position on abortion isn't popular at all with Americans who love democracy

[Jerry2144]

8. Correction

Their position isn’t popular with any American who loves democracy. The same anti-abortion oppressors also oppose voting rights and any legislation that makes it easier to vote or makes elections more representative of how people voted (gerrymandering and electoral college reforms)

[2naSalit]

5. Heh...

[Walleye]

7. Yeah the secret that they hate women. You never know how these people are going to react

I thought they would be celebrating, now they’re just outraged again. I don’t think they can live without anger

[NCDem47]

9. There's motive for this to be a RW leak.

Less drama. Out-of-nowhere. Soft landing. Ensure the court stays on track with opinion.

[JohnSJ]

10. If they are really outraged it is only because they think it might have an adverse reaction to

their political ambitions

[leftstreet]

24. +1 I haven't seen them jumping to support the opinion

Aside from Romney, not hearing any GOPer pols rushing out to endorse the potential ending of Roe v Wade

[bucolic_frolic]

11. The guys who think ivermectin is health care think abortion isn't

and still think Trump can abort the 2020 election. We're just being played over and over with concepts that are opposite to what sane people think and reality is, and it resurfaces in another context and is used against us. This is some type of subliminal reformation

[Lovie777]

12. Why the fuck are they "outraged" or "concerned" . . .

they are more "concerned" about the leak than the right and health of a women.

[MamaCuatro]

14. serious error

I think the concern regarding the leak is its apparent purpose is to shame/vilify the justices and attempt to manipulate their vote on any given case. The repercussions are severe, no matter whose side of a particular case you find yourself.

The sanctity of the Court is (was) always highly esteemed. This has been lost. The leaker(s) should be found and prosecuted.

[ck4829]

15. ... nah. The Court can't have both sanctity and playing politics.

It's got to choose one or the other.

[The Grand Illuminist]

16. It is a double edged sword.

Nt

[The Magistrate]

18. Bullshit

These shit-heels are not judges, they are frauds placed on the court to legislate an agenda that four-fifths of the population opposes.

Any pressure, I repeat any pressure brought to bear on these christo-fascists is legitimate and proper.

[The Grand Illuminist]

19. I do agree

The whistle blower should be commended.

[MamaCuatro]

22. information please

You are saying that ALL of the current justices are frauds?

Please provide factual support for your 4/5 agenda opposition. Not trying to be confrontational, I want to review the facts of your argument and not emotion.

[The Magistrate]

23. Cute As A Bug In A Rug, Honey

"The essence of trolling is provoking someone into more effort than one makes oneself."

[ck4829]

28. Yes, information please. Let's review the facts around "sanctity" of the court while we're at it

"Sanctity" sounds more like a social construct and kind of arbitrary to me.

The sanctity of the Court is (was) always highly esteemed.

How was this achieved? Has this been maintained until the leak?

[SoonerPride]

21. Welcome to DU!

The court lost its high esteem with the stolen seat.

That era is long over.

[W_HAMILTON]

29. LOL, there is no sanctity of this Supreme Court.

That's been long gone and Republicans have only themselves to blame for it.

Fuck 'em.

[Jilly_in_VA]

17. Oh boo hoo

It's what THEY wanted, after all. They can deal with it.
(we need a FU smiley)

[LetMyPeopleVote]

20. Screw these assholes

[gratuitous]

25. There's no law against it

And we just spent four years watching a horrible president smash precedent and break norms because there were no law against it (mostly because nobody thought the president would ever be such a poltroon). Also, that administration did indeed break laws with impunity, knowing that the Department of Justice wouldn't prosecute them, but instead act as the president's personal law firm.

I don't remember anyone on the right wing uttering a peep about any of that. They're "outraged" now, are they? Boo fuckin' hoo.

[BlueIdaho]

26. I bet they are...

It goes a long way to proving not everybody is on board with this sexist, fascist overthrow of women’s rights.

[Wounded Bear]

27. Of course, it's what they do...

I remember way back when, after the Iran-Contra scandal. They were more angry aboutt Ollie North for "betraying" his loyalty to Reagan than they were about the way Reagan broke the law to support RW terrorists in Central America that killed a convent of nuns.

The authoritarian roots run deep. One facet of that is valuing "personal loyalty" to the leader more than adhering to their actual oaths to the Constitution.

[AngryOldDem]

30. Yeah, but they're absolutely giddy about what it says.

[TheRealNorth]

31. Maybe that was the plan all along....

Give the Republicans a narrative they could run with whenever they are asked about abortion.