General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forums"not so bad as..."
I wonder if the case before the supreme court that is poised to overturn Roe will be viewed as;
"not so bad as..." if it is any less than the pile of vomit alito wrote in his opinion to overturn Roe.
"not so bad as alito's opinion"
"not so bad as I feared"
"not so bad as those 'crazy' people warned"
etc.
How many talking heads, political podcasts, friends, family, or people here, would accept any diminishment of Roe as
"not so bad as..."
edited to add: I believe it is called lowering expectations. Or lowering the bar/standard.

markie
(23,500 posts)unblock
(55,382 posts)and that the final opinion may be something less radical than what was leak.
But it doesn't matter.
They've made it clear that this is where the supreme court's majority head is at, and this is the direction they are heading. If they scale it back, it will only be temporary, until the next step can be portrayed as less of an outrage. They have been methodically moving us deeper into authoritarianism and restriction of civil liberties and rights for decades and will continue to do so.
If they try to get away with done thing less this time, they will try to get away with the rest later.
Cerridwen
(13,262 posts)to see how to position their resources.
Fewer resources in states already plowing ahead (puns intended) and denying abortions; more resources in tougher markets to wear down the opposition.
Gawd, I'm cynical.
Karma13612
(4,778 posts)
And you are right. They are using surgical precision in their tactics. Again, pun intended!
Cerridwen
(13,262 posts)Karma13612
(4,778 posts)Trial balloon. And yes, I have heard another closely related turn of phrase:
Managing expectations.
It would provide the same results I think. Basically, we are now thinking and voicing all the nasty unthinkable outcomes IF Roe is overturned. If it turns out that instead the SCOTUS decides on a horrendous time limit of 6 or 8 weeks, then many will be relieved. And it may quiet the masses forming now.
But, a 6-8 week limit for abortions would mean that women who have miscarriages further down the pregnancy journey will be viewed as complicit and probably faces legal consequences.
All around, this situation is just completely untenable.
Cerridwen
(13,262 posts)See my reply #5 above for a little more detail.
Efilroft Sul
(4,088 posts)No, it is that fucking bad. And thinking like this only enables the abuser to do worse next time.
Cerridwen
(13,262 posts)gratuitous
(82,849 posts)If your torturer threatens to lop your head off, but only cuts off your dominant arm at the elbow, I suppose a case could be made that it was "not so bad." I can't say whether the torture victim would agree.
Triloon
(506 posts)I don't think has had enough air. Alito based some of his opinion on the work of the 17th century British jurist Sir Matthew Hale. Hale was a noted misogynist, witch trial judge, and apologist for marital rape.
Here is a good article on him and Alito.
https://www.propublica.org/article/abortion-roe-wade-alito-scotus-hale#1325809