General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsCould a freedom of privacy Constitutional amendment pass in the current environment or hurt the GOP?
Might be useful to try and at least get opponents on record being against a key liberty. Would make any SC decisions trying to strip decisions based on privacy as an implied right, such as Roe v Wade, Griswold v Connecticut etc, moot.
Nevertheless, the attempt would be a great way to destroy the propaganda that the GOP is the party of liberty.
PoliticAverse
(26,366 posts)drray23
(7,627 posts)and given the polarization of this country it never will be again.
The requirements for it are 2/3 of senate and house as well as 3/4 of the state legislatures.
The last one (27th) which changed the way congress is renumerated passed in 1992, 202 years after being first proposed.
Don't hold your breath.
andym
(5,443 posts)It would play hell with their marketing and create cognitive dissonance for their followers.
Hortensis
(58,785 posts)Not. A. Chance.
I've forgotten the details, but the constitution allows states to choose various ways to approve or deny an amendment, I think at least 4 basic types, and most of them have always enabled the governor and/or leaders of a faction in power to rig the outcomes to their choice.
BlueCheeseAgain
(1,654 posts)The threshold is just too high.
TheRealNorth
(9,478 posts)Ie. to influence elections with millions of dollars without knowing where the money came from
To threaten or defame political enemies anonymously
To openly engage in neo-nazi, brown-shirt demonstrations and not have your identities posted on the web (however, if you sign a recall politician against a Republican candidate, your info will be posted in a searchable database).