Thu Jun 23, 2022, 10:42 AM

Dear "supreme court", if you're going to continue to flood this country with guns

Stop crying about being threatened by them.

50 replies, 8130 views

Thread info Bookmark this thread Trash this thread

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum

Replies to this discussion thread

50 replies	Author	Time	Post
Dear "supreme court", if you're going to continue to flood this country with guns (Original post)	onecaliberal	Jun 23	OP
Good 👍 one!	sheshe2	Jun 23	#1
Watching NY Governor Hochul speaking about the SC decision overturning her state's gun law.	sop	Jun 23	#2
I live 30 minutes from the Ontario/NYS border, and can see upper NYS	luvtheGWN	Jun 23	#16
I don't blame you one iota.	llmart	Jun 23	#34
I always considered NYS to be fairly safe, too.	wnylib	Jun 24	#41
She was once	disndat	Jun 24	#47
And take ownership of your increased need for security and stop sponging off us	BeyondGeography	Jun 23	#3
All Democrats need to claw back the increased SC protection, and they need to	Scrivener7	Jun 23	#4
Don't really want	Justretired	Jun 23	#5
I hear you...	TheRealNorth	Jun 23	#8
Sounds good but I doubt you'd ever get a shot off.	jaxexpat	Jun 23	#13
I suppose being a "Good German" is safer....	TheRealNorth	Jun 23	#31
They don't feel threatened by guns. They feel threatened by chalk. nt	Jade Fox	Jun 23	#6
One rule for the lifetime ruling class	bronxiteforever	Jun 23	#7
People of color need to start open carrying	elias7	Jun 23	#9
When the Black Panthers were photographed carrying guns	leftieNanner	Jun 23	#10
+1	RamblingRose	Jun 23	#15
It would make them open season for scared white men.	onecaliberal	Jun 23	#20
Absolutely.	RocRizzo55	Jun 23	#26
The only gun control that Republicans accept is	wnylib	Jun 24	#42
This is what they really said.... Don't be the last on your Block to get a Glock!	ashredux	Jun 23	#11
+1	chowder66	Jun 23	#17
To add insult to injury, we're paying for their fucking protection.	Vinca	Jun 23	#12
Absolutely!	Rebl2	Jun 23	#14
I wonder if the SC justices	Mr. Evil	Jun 23	#18
Come on now we aren't allowed on the rich peoples streets.	The Jungle 1	Jun 23	#29
WTF	Mr. Evil	Jun 23	#33
Repeat after me: "We are not worthy. We are not worthy. We are not worthy to walk, bike, or drive	ShazzieB	Jun 23	#40
Just because it's called the Supreme Court,	wnylib	Jun 24	#43
But...but they are privileged and they have set it up that way with their rulings. They protect....	usaf-vet	Jun 23	#19
They think kids coming home from school decapitated is an acceptable sacrifice for their "right"	onecaliberal	Jun 23	#25
We've come to this	Nevilledog	Jun 23	#32
No protection for the Unsupreme court.	BlueJac	Jun 23	#21
Their hypocrisy should be in millions of 2022 campaign ads. n/t	MarcA	Jun 23	#22
Absofuckingloutely!	SheltieLover	Jun 23	#23
They all have paper courage	RANDYWILDMAN	Jun 23	#24
No protection for them! What bought and paid for assholes!	burrowowl	Jun 23	#27
Well, only muskets and the pistols of the	burrowowl	Jun 23	#28
No special protection for	wnylib	Jun 24	#44
Uvalde school police chief placed on leave	The Jungle 1	Jun 23	#30
Brilliant!!!	Cha	Jun 23	#35
Exactly! start packing your own? Wild west returns	Evolve Dammit	Jun 23	#36
Why are they asking for extra protection?	dickthegrouch	Jun 23	#37
You want gun culture run amok...then live with the results of your stupidity...toxic,	Demsrule86	Jun 23	#38
what the SC just	azureblue	Jun 23	#39
Besides beating into a plow share, name one thing...	czarjak	Jun 24	#45
Read the ruling.	Straw Man	Jun 24	#46
Always Ironic to see	disndat	Jun 24	#48
Follow the money, these guys are bought and paid for	bucolic_frolic	Jun 24	#49
Also it's time to stop saying that you are "pro life".	Initech	Jun 24	#50

Response to onecaliberal (Original post)

Thu Jun 23, 2022, 10:53 AM

sheshe2 (76,383 posts)

1. Good 👍 one!

Reply to this post

Response to onecaliberal (Original post)

Thu Jun 23, 2022, 10:59 AM

sop (7,523 posts)

2. Watching NY Governor Hochul speaking about the SC decision overturning her state's gun law.

She seems dumfounded. Apparently, life isn't sufficiently nasty, brutish and short.

Reply to this post

Response to sop (Reply #2)

Thu Jun 23, 2022, 12:21 PM

luvtheGWN (1,308 posts)

16. I live 30 minutes from the Ontario/NYS border, and can see upper NYS

from my back deck.

That's as close as I will get. Always considered NYS to be pretty safe because of its gun laws. Not now. Won't be doing any cross-border shopping or visiting with relatives in any US state now.

Reply to this post

Response to luvtheGWN (Reply #16)

Thu Jun 23, 2022, 07:04 PM

llmart (13,240 posts)

34. I don't blame you one iota.

A couple friends and I were planning a vacation together somewhere in the US (we live here), but we decided to vacation in Canada this year. One of them said, "I don't feel safe in the US any longer." This was before today's godawful ruling.

Reply to this post

Response to luvtheGWN (Reply #16)

Fri Jun 24, 2022, 12:49 AM

wnylib (13,127 posts)

41. I always considered NYS to be fairly safe, too.

But no more. And I live in NYS.

Reply to this post

Response to sop (Reply #2)

Fri Jun 24, 2022, 08:33 AM

disndat (1,873 posts)

47. She was once

an A rated NRA member, until she wasn't.

Reply to this post

Response to onecaliberal (Original post)

Thu Jun 23, 2022, 10:59 AM

BeyondGeography (38,010 posts)

3. And take ownership of your increased need for security and stop sponging off us

Lifetime tenured assholes.

Reply to this post

Response to onecaliberal (Original post)

Thu Jun 23, 2022, 11:35 AM

Scrivener7 (43,427 posts)

4. All Democrats need to claw back the increased SC protection, and they need to

"dossier" two or three republiQans to vote with them.

Reply to this post

Response to onecaliberal (Original post)

Thu Jun 23, 2022, 11:48 AM

Justretired (1 post)

5. Don't really want

Or need a rifle. Don’t sell them to kids.

Reply to this post

Response to Justretired (Reply #5)

Thu Jun 23, 2022, 12:08 PM

TheRealNorth (6,186 posts)

8. I hear you...

But I prefer to have that option when the Proud Boys come a knocking to round up political dissenters the next time Republicans try a coup.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.thebulwark.com/notes-on-an-authoritarian-conspiracy-inside-the-claremont-institutes-79-days-to-inauguration-report/%3famp

Reply to this post

Response to TheRealNorth (Reply #8)

Thu Jun 23, 2022, 12:14 PM

jaxexpat (3,600 posts)

13. Sounds good but I doubt you'd ever get a shot off.

They won't be coming in their camo and ammo clothes waving flags, you know. They'll be wearing the uniforms of local LEO's and waving warrants.

Reply to this post

Response to jaxexpat (Reply #13)

Thu Jun 23, 2022, 03:14 PM

TheRealNorth (6,186 posts)

31. I suppose being a "Good German" is safer....

Some will undoubtedly choose to live on their knees, but I would rather die on my feet.

Reply to this post

Response to onecaliberal (Original post)

Thu Jun 23, 2022, 12:05 PM

Jade Fox (9,170 posts)

6. They don't feel threatened by guns. They feel threatened by chalk. nt

Reply to this post

Response to onecaliberal (Original post)

Thu Jun 23, 2022, 12:07 PM

bronxiteforever (7,945 posts)

7. One rule for the lifetime ruling class

another for everyone else.

Reply to this post

Response to onecaliberal (Original post)

Thu Jun 23, 2022, 12:08 PM

elias7 (3,332 posts)

9. People of color need to start open carrying

Reply to this post

Response to elias7 (Reply #9)

Thu Jun 23, 2022, 12:10 PM

leftieNanner (12,628 posts)

10. When the Black Panthers were photographed carrying guns

St. Ronnie wanted gun control RIGHT NOW!

Damn.

Reply to this post

Response to elias7 (Reply #9)

Thu Jun 23, 2022, 12:20 PM

RamblingRose (836 posts)

15. +1

Reply to this post

Response to elias7 (Reply #9)

Thu Jun 23, 2022, 12:42 PM

onecaliberal (25,055 posts)

20. It would make them open season for scared white men.

Reply to this post

Response to elias7 (Reply #9)

Thu Jun 23, 2022, 01:36 PM

RocRizzo55 (329 posts)

26. Absolutely.

That would surely call forvthe bigots to start controlling guns.
I remember when the Black Panthers started open carrying rifles. The freaking bigots were stepping all over themselves to enact gun control.

Reply to this post

Response to RocRizzo55 (Reply #26)

Fri Jun 24, 2022, 12:51 AM

wnylib (13,127 posts)

42. The only gun control that Republicans accept is

Don't sell them to POC.

Reply to this post

Response to onecaliberal (Original post)

Thu Jun 23, 2022, 12:12 PM

ashredux (1,896 posts)

11. This is what they really said.... Don't be the last on your Block to get a Glock!

Reply to this post

Response to ashredux (Reply #11)

Thu Jun 23, 2022, 12:26 PM

chowder66 (6,977 posts)

17. +1

Reply to this post

Response to onecaliberal (Original post)

Thu Jun 23, 2022, 12:13 PM

Vinca (48,414 posts)

12. To add insult to injury, we're paying for their fucking protection.

Reply to this post

Response to onecaliberal (Original post)

Thu Jun 23, 2022, 12:18 PM

Rebl2 (7,075 posts)

14. Absolutely!

You need extra security, you should pay for it yourself.

Reply to this post

Response to onecaliberal (Original post)

Thu Jun 23, 2022, 12:32 PM

Mr. Evil (2,005 posts)

18. I wonder if the SC justices

that now want guns everywhere in public would be against several people armed to the teeth parked outside their homes. On public streets. So, if the cops tried to make them disperse wouldn't that be in violation of their very ruling?

These worthless, pathetic, Death Party lackeys are simply going to get a lot more people killed. I'm really beginning to wonder if that's not by design. For the life of me I cannot understand why the part about a 'well regulated militia' is never referenced in decisions like these.

Reply to this post

Response to Mr. Evil (Reply #18)

Thu Jun 23, 2022, 02:35 PM

The Jungle 1 (2,365 posts)

29. Come on now we aren't allowed on the rich peoples streets.

No way.
You just stay home.

Reply to this post

Response to The Jungle 1 (Reply #29)

Thu Jun 23, 2022, 03:31 PM

Mr. Evil (2,005 posts)

33. WTF

was I thinking!? A brief lapse of sanity.

Reply to this post

Response to Mr. Evil (Reply #33)

Thu Jun 23, 2022, 10:55 PM

ShazzieB (6,703 posts)

40. Repeat after me: "We are not worthy. We are not worthy. We are not worthy to walk, bike, or drive

upon the streets where the homes of these superior beings are located."

Surely you must know this already!

Reply to this post

Response to ShazzieB (Reply #40)

Fri Jun 24, 2022, 12:54 AM

wnylib (13,127 posts)

43. Just because it's called the Supreme Court,

they think that they are supreme beings.

Reply to this post

Response to onecaliberal (Original post)

Thu Jun 23, 2022, 12:34 PM

usaf-vet (4,898 posts)

19. But...but they are privileged and they have set it up that way with their rulings. They protect....

....themselves. The rest of us are not important. Look how many kids they have failed to protect in public schools.

Let just one of their offspring get even a bloody nose from some bully and the laws will be tailored to stop that danger.

Reply to this post

Response to usaf-vet (Reply #19)

Thu Jun 23, 2022, 01:31 PM

onecaliberal (25,055 posts)

25. They think kids coming home from school decapitated is an acceptable sacrifice for their "right"

Reply to this post

Response to usaf-vet (Reply #19)

Thu Jun 23, 2022, 03:26 PM

Nevilledog (38,062 posts)

32. We've come to this

Reply to this post

Response to onecaliberal (Original post)

Thu Jun 23, 2022, 01:04 PM

BlueJac (7,638 posts)

21. No protection for the Unsupreme court.

They cause problems they should suffer the consequences like the rest of the population! Expand the court, take away their power to destroy this country.

Reply to this post

Response to onecaliberal (Original post)

Thu Jun 23, 2022, 01:14 PM

MarcA (2,033 posts)

22. Their hypocrisy should be in millions of 2022 campaign ads. n/t

Reply to this post

Response to onecaliberal (Original post)

Thu Jun 23, 2022, 01:14 PM

SheltieLover (42,062 posts)

23. Absofuckingloutely!

Reply to this post

Response to onecaliberal (Original post)

Thu Jun 23, 2022, 01:16 PM

RANDYWILDMAN (1,866 posts)

24. They all have paper courage

Brett loves the idea of a threat, I bet his friends all made threats towards Ms Ford, but then it comes to actual threats towards him and his family, those are bad, bad,bad.

Reply to this post

Response to onecaliberal (Original post)

Thu Jun 23, 2022, 01:45 PM

burrowowl (15,875 posts)

27. No protection for them! What bought and paid for assholes!

Reply to this post

Response to onecaliberal (Original post)

Thu Jun 23, 2022, 02:26 PM

burrowowl (15,875 posts)

28. Well, only muskets and the pistols of the

time the constitution can be carried!
No SS protection for the so-called Justices can be granted!

Reply to this post

Response to burrowowl (Reply #28)

Fri Jun 24, 2022, 12:57 AM

wnylib (13,127 posts)

44. No special protection for

SC justices in the constitution. Did not exist in 1789. Therefore, not constitutional to grant them special protection today.

Reply to this post

Response to onecaliberal (Original post)

Thu Jun 23, 2022, 02:47 PM

The Jungle 1 (2,365 posts)

30. Uvalde school police chief placed on leave

Let that asshat clown run the new SC protection squad. He is good guy with a gun.
Tell me something when the F do these creeps in power start representing the majority of Americans.

Reply to this post

Response to onecaliberal (Original post)

Thu Jun 23, 2022, 07:27 PM

Cha (276,905 posts)

35. Brilliant!!!

💙💛

Reply to this post

Response to onecaliberal (Original post)

Thu Jun 23, 2022, 08:07 PM

Evolve Dammit (10,419 posts)

36. Exactly! start packing your own? Wild west returns

Reply to this post

Response to onecaliberal (Original post)

Thu Jun 23, 2022, 09:41 PM

dickthegrouch (2,809 posts)

37. Why are they asking for extra protection?

Since Uvalde we've been told repeatedly that, the wording on the cars notwithstanding, the cops have no actual enforceable duty to protect.

"Supreme" ? get your own f'ing protection.

Sue the cop that hides behind a million excuses for not protecting you. See where we are.

My right to life and liberty is MUCH more important than any random fool who wants to wave a gun around in public.

Reply to this post

Response to onecaliberal (Original post)

Thu Jun 23, 2022, 09:51 PM

Demsrule86 (60,306 posts)

38. You want gun culture run amok...then live with the results of your stupidity...toxic,

renegade court...soon someone likely a Democrat will say to one of your ridiculous rulings...Make Me. And then you are done which is a damn shame...an honorable institution for 100's of years which you politically motivated traitors have destroyed. You disgust me. And I do not feel bound by any of your stupid rulings...so soon you will hear MAKE ME in the near future...then call out your armies...oh wait you don't have any.

Reply to this post

Response to onecaliberal (Original post)

Thu Jun 23, 2022, 10:17 PM

azureblue (1,780 posts)

39. what the SC just

was to back themselves into a corner. The foundation of the gun ruling is that federal law overrides state law. The "plot" to throw out the abortion ruling is to give enforcement to the states. IOW, on one hand federal law rules, and OTOH, states rights takes precedent.

Reply to this post

Response to onecaliberal (Original post)

Fri Jun 24, 2022, 03:02 AM

czarjak (6,720 posts)

45. Besides beating into a plow share, name one thing...

you're going to do with a gun that will be pleasing in God's sight, rubes. Commandments, Shamandments, Thrumpers.

Reply to this post

Response to onecaliberal (Original post)

Fri Jun 24, 2022, 03:09 AM

Straw Man (5,948 posts)

46. Read the ruling.

This is far from a mandate for "Constitutional" (i.e. permitless) carry. States can still set objective criteria for carry permits. What it does is remove the absolute discretionary power of the state to deny a permit without giving a reason. Judges and the PD (in NYC) have had that discretionary power in New York since the 1911 Sullivan Act, which was in part motivated by Tammany Hall's desire to ensure that their goons could be armed while those of their political rivals could not.

Reply to this post

Response to onecaliberal (Original post)

Fri Jun 24, 2022, 08:57 AM

disndat (1,873 posts)