General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsDear "supreme court", if you're going to continue to flood this country with guns
Stop crying about being threatened by them.
sheshe2
(83,746 posts)sop
(10,156 posts)She seems dumfounded. Apparently, life isn't sufficiently nasty, brutish and short.
luvtheGWN
(1,336 posts)from my back deck.
That's as close as I will get. Always considered NYS to be pretty safe because of its gun laws. Not now. Won't be doing any cross-border shopping or visiting with relatives in any US state now.
llmart
(15,536 posts)A couple friends and I were planning a vacation together somewhere in the US (we live here), but we decided to vacation in Canada this year. One of them said, "I don't feel safe in the US any longer." This was before today's godawful ruling.
wnylib
(21,432 posts)But no more. And I live in NYS.
an A rated NRA member, until she wasn't.
BeyondGeography
(39,369 posts)Lifetime tenured assholes.
Scrivener7
(50,949 posts)"dossier" two or three republiQans to vote with them.
Justretired
(1 post)Or need a rifle. Dont sell them to kids.
TheRealNorth
(9,478 posts)But I prefer to have that option when the Proud Boys come a knocking to round up political dissenters the next time Republicans try a coup.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.thebulwark.com/notes-on-an-authoritarian-conspiracy-inside-the-claremont-institutes-79-days-to-inauguration-report/%3famp
jaxexpat
(6,818 posts)They won't be coming in their camo and ammo clothes waving flags, you know. They'll be wearing the uniforms of local LEO's and waving warrants.
TheRealNorth
(9,478 posts)Some will undoubtedly choose to live on their knees, but I would rather die on my feet.
Jade Fox
(10,030 posts)bronxiteforever
(9,287 posts)another for everyone else.
elias7
(3,997 posts)leftieNanner
(15,082 posts)St. Ronnie wanted gun control RIGHT NOW!
Damn.
onecaliberal
(32,826 posts)RocRizzo55
(980 posts)That would surely call forvthe bigots to start controlling guns.
I remember when the Black Panthers started open carrying rifles. The freaking bigots were stepping all over themselves to enact gun control.
wnylib
(21,432 posts)Don't sell them to POC.
ashredux
(2,604 posts)Vinca
(50,261 posts)Rebl2
(13,492 posts)You need extra security, you should pay for it yourself.
Mr. Evil
(2,839 posts)that now want guns everywhere in public would be against several people armed to the teeth parked outside their homes. On public streets. So, if the cops tried to make them disperse wouldn't that be in violation of their very ruling?
These worthless, pathetic, Death Party lackeys are simply going to get a lot more people killed. I'm really beginning to wonder if that's not by design. For the life of me I cannot understand why the part about a 'well regulated militia' is never referenced in decisions like these.
The Jungle 1
(4,552 posts)No way.
You just stay home.
Mr. Evil
(2,839 posts)was I thinking!? A brief lapse of sanity.
ShazzieB
(16,370 posts)upon the streets where the homes of these superior beings are located."
Surely you must know this already!
wnylib
(21,432 posts)they think that they are supreme beings.
usaf-vet
(6,181 posts)....themselves. The rest of us are not important. Look how many kids they have failed to protect in public schools.
Let just one of their offspring get even a bloody nose from some bully and the laws will be tailored to stop that danger.
onecaliberal
(32,826 posts)Nevilledog
(51,080 posts)BlueJac
(7,838 posts)They cause problems they should suffer the consequences like the rest of the population! Expand the court, take away their power to destroy this country.
MarcA
(2,195 posts)SheltieLover
(57,073 posts)RANDYWILDMAN
(2,668 posts)Brett loves the idea of a threat, I bet his friends all made threats towards Ms Ford, but then it comes to actual threats towards him and his family, those are bad, bad,bad.
burrowowl
(17,638 posts)burrowowl
(17,638 posts)time the constitution can be carried!
No SS protection for the so-called Justices can be granted!
wnylib
(21,432 posts)SC justices in the constitution. Did not exist in 1789. Therefore, not constitutional to grant them special protection today.
The Jungle 1
(4,552 posts)Let that asshat clown run the new SC protection squad. He is good guy with a gun.
Tell me something when the F do these creeps in power start representing the majority of Americans.
Cha
(297,154 posts)Evolve Dammit
(16,723 posts)dickthegrouch
(3,172 posts)Since Uvalde we've been told repeatedly that, the wording on the cars notwithstanding, the cops have no actual enforceable duty to protect.
"Supreme" ? get your own f'ing protection.
Sue the cop that hides behind a million excuses for not protecting you. See where we are.
My right to life and liberty is MUCH more important than any random fool who wants to wave a gun around in public.
Demsrule86
(68,552 posts)renegade court...soon someone likely a Democrat will say to one of your ridiculous rulings...Make Me. And then you are done which is a damn shame...an honorable institution for 100's of years which you politically motivated traitors have destroyed. You disgust me. And I do not feel bound by any of your stupid rulings...so soon you will hear MAKE ME in the near future...then call out your armies...oh wait you don't have any.
azureblue
(2,146 posts)was to back themselves into a corner. The foundation of the gun ruling is that federal law overrides state law. The "plot" to throw out the abortion ruling is to give enforcement to the states. IOW, on one hand federal law rules, and OTOH, states rights takes precedent.
czarjak
(11,266 posts)you're going to do with a gun that will be pleasing in God's sight, rubes. Commandments, Shamandments, Thrumpers.
Straw Man
(6,623 posts)This is far from a mandate for "Constitutional" (i.e. permitless) carry. States can still set objective criteria for carry permits. What it does is remove the absolute discretionary power of the state to deny a permit without giving a reason. Judges and the PD (in NYC) have had that discretionary power in New York since the 1911 Sullivan Act, which was in part motivated by Tammany Hall's desire to ensure that their goons could be armed while those of their political rivals could not.
disndat
(1,887 posts)A.C.Barratt's name listed in support of proliferating guns. She is so self-righteous on the subject protecting the fetus.
bucolic_frolic
(43,128 posts)Prove it and you've got traction of sorts
Initech
(100,063 posts)Because you clearly aren't.