Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThomas calls for overturning precedents on contraceptives, LGBTQ rights
https://thehill.com/regulation/court-battles/3535841-thomas-calls-for-overturning-precedents-on-contraceptives-lgbtq-rights/
Thomas calls for overturning precedents on contraceptives, LGBTQ rights
by Harper Neidig - 06/24/22 11:08 AM ET
Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas on Friday called for overturning the constitutional rights the court had affirmed for access to contraceptives and LGBTQ rights in an opinion concurring with the majority to decision to overturn Roe v. Wade.
In his separate opinion, Thomas acknowledged that Fridays decision does not directly affect any rights besides abortion. But he argued that the constitutions Due Process Clause does not secure a right to an abortion or any other substantive rights, and he urged the court to apply that reasoning to other landmark cases.
Thomas wrote, In future cases, we should reconsider all of this Courts substantive due process precedents, including Griswold, Lawrence, and Obergefell.
snip//
In Griswold v. Connecticut, the court ruled in 1965 that married couples have a right to access contraceptive. In 2003, the court said in Lawrence v. Texas that states could not outlaw consensual gay sex. And the courts 2015 decision in Obergefell v. Hodges established a constitutional right to same-sex marriage.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
9 replies, 597 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (1)
ReplyReply to this post
9 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Thomas calls for overturning precedents on contraceptives, LGBTQ rights (Original Post)
babylonsister
Jun 2022
OP
What a tragic moment in American history. The bully Supreme Court justice is married
Baitball Blogger
Jun 2022
#7
Ocelot II
(115,615 posts)1. Why didn't he mention Loving v. Virginia?
cos dem
(902 posts)5. Hmmm, I wonder... could it be???
He is such an asshole, probably the worst one on the court. And for this court, that's saying something!
oregonjen
(3,334 posts)6. Hmmm, that's a head scratcher
ismnotwasm
(41,968 posts)2. He sure did.
Hes a pig
Texaswitchy
(2,962 posts)3. Well husbands will like supporting a large family.
One income and all.
PCIntern
(25,491 posts)4. Also ban Coke cans.
Long Dong Silver, indeed..
Baitball Blogger
(46,684 posts)7. What a tragic moment in American history. The bully Supreme Court justice is married
to a woman who was part of a group that tried to overturn the country. I guess they're both working for the same cause, one working within the system, and the other outside the system.
gldstwmn
(4,575 posts)8. He needs to go. We need to start calling for
his resignation.
brush
(53,743 posts)9. Him and Alito, the worst of the worst on SCOTUS.
And all those winger justices are horrible.
Thomas is just signalling more outrageous, right-snatching opinions to come from the 6-3 majority.