General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsKavanaugh believes their is a right to interstate travel for an abortion.
How white of him. https://www.alternet.org/2022/06/brett-kavanaugh-voted-to-strike-down-roe-but-doesnt-believe-states-can-restrict-interstate-travel-for-abortions/
AlexSFCA
(6,137 posts)under 5th amendment. That would be nationwide. Women will have to travel to Canada or Mexico.
getagrip_already
(14,231 posts)that all women be tested for pregnancy before international travel. can't have pregger's running around the world, now can we?
this scotus would uphold that. it would only take one election cycle to make it national.
They would use the precedent of covid testing requirements.
I never would have posted something that sounds that crazy in the past, but these are crazy times.
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2022/may/03/us-abortions-travel-wave-of-restrictions
rurallib
(62,343 posts)Hugh_Lebowski
(33,643 posts)Smackdown2019
(1,169 posts)He is correct, we all can travel freely across state borders. Even if let say one is a resident of texas yesterday, what to say that they become a resient of California today?
Duncan Grant
(8,257 posts)Beware the massive PR campaign underway. Im encouraging friends to brush-up on their 20th century European history - with the understanding that history doesnt repeat itself but it rhymes.
Why in the world, after going through all this meticulous planning, would they allow interstate travel for abortion? It doesnt compute. Dont fall for it.
underpants
(182,271 posts)If Id known that saying, Id forgotten it. Thanks.
SamKnause
(13,037 posts)I don't believe anything he says.
gibraltar72
(7,486 posts)it is racist. Took me almost half of my life to break myself of using it. And he's been known to lie.
Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin
(107,063 posts)I don't.
hatrack
(59,439 posts)Seriously, fuck this guy with a tire iron.
LetMyPeopleVote
(143,998 posts)Totally Tunsie
(10,885 posts)he believed that Roe had precedence. Liar, liar.
Zeitghost
(3,796 posts)Precedence is legally binding?
Totally Tunsie
(10,885 posts)The point I was making is that we have absolutely no reason to trust in what Kavanaugh may or may not "believe", in this instance or any other.
Zeitghost
(3,796 posts)Then him saying Roe was precedent and then voting to overturn it was not a lie.
So while I have no reason to trust Justice Kavanaugh, his statements at his confirmation hearings give me no specific reason not to.
Retrograde
(10,068 posts)IMHO, it should be "Kavanaugh believes theirs is the right to interstate travel for an abortion", meaning he and his ilk can send their wives, daughters, or girlfriends off to get an abortion when it's convenient for them. The rest of us are stuck where we are.
Just a pedantic septuagenarian here.
Totally Tunsie
(10,885 posts)Retrograde
(10,068 posts)although either is correct
treestar
(82,383 posts)the right to travel. It is part of history and all that which abortion was said not to be.
rownesheck
(2,343 posts)drunk when he said that.
ProfessorGAC
(64,413 posts)First, he's a stupid liar, drunk or sober.
Second, i think he's always drunk! Sure acts like it.