General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsA judgeship for a two U.S. attorney appointments????? Am I missing something?
Link to tweet
Thomas Hurt
(13,903 posts)temporary though....wtf.
Kid Berwyn
(14,851 posts)Morgan Watkins
Louisville Courier Journal, August 19, 2020
A Russian company that has invested in Braidy Industries' planned aluminum rolling mill in Eastern Kentucky was identified as a proxy of the Kremlin in a new report the Senate Intelligence Committee released this week.
The Russian firm, United Co. Rusal, agreed last year to invest $200 million in the mill, which is expected to create hundreds of long-term jobs in a struggling region of the state if Braidy is able to raise enough financing to build the facility, which will cost well over $1.5 billion.
The Republican-led Senate committee released a report Tuesday that detailed extensive connections between President Donald Trump's 2016 campaign advisers and people with ties to Russian President Vladimir Putin's regime.
And it points to Russian oligarch Oleg Deripaska a part-owner of Rusal, which is a major aluminum company that operates internationally as a key figure.
Snip
The U.S. Senate voted down a measure opposing the plan to end the sanctions against Rusal and EN+ Group in January 2019. Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, as well as Sen. Rand Paul, both Kentucky Republicans, voted against that attempt to keep the sanctions in place.
The Kentucky Democratic Party on Wednesday questioned McConnell's decision to support lifting the sanctions on Rusal, in light of the Senate Intelligence Committee report's identification of Rusal as a proxy for the Kremlin.
Continues
https://www.courier-journal.com/story/news/2020/08/19/senate-report-russian-investor-braidy-mill-kremlin-proxy/5607217002/
msongs
(67,381 posts)AleksS
(1,665 posts)Never hold their end of any deal anyways.
Lying through their teeth each and every time.
Phoenix61
(16,999 posts)The current occupant of the seat being vacated is a Bush appointee -- unlikely that she's all that liberal. There are six judges on the Eastern District of Kentucky - all of them currently are Trump or GW Bush appointees. So it goes from a court where a republican is certain to be assigned a case to a court in which ....a republican is certain to be assigned a case.
Moreover, the Eastern District of KY is part of the Sixth Circuit -- any case decided by the District Court would be appealed to the Sixth Circuit and that court is solidly in Republican hands: its sixteen judges include 10 republican appointees: 6 Trump Judges 4 GW Bush judges. The six Democrats include 3 Clinton appointees, 2 Obama appointees and one Biden appointee. That line up isn't impacted by the deal with McConnell. So, in the end, if a Democrat was appointed to the District Court spot, that judge would only have a one in six chance of hearing any particular case and the odds of that judge's decisions being reversed by the appeals court would be very high.
https://democraticunderground.com/100216877010
WhiskeyGrinder
(22,314 posts)moderate!