Fri Jul 8, 2022, 11:18 PM
Comfortably_Numb (3,062 posts)
Anybody else get back on twitter now that the rich man-baby is exiting stage -- good riddance?
|
24 replies, 1248 views
![]() |
Author | Time | Post |
![]() |
Comfortably_Numb | Jul 2022 | OP |
Ocelot II | Jul 2022 | #1 | |
Comfortably_Numb | Jul 2022 | #2 | |
Blue Owl | Jul 2022 | #3 | |
sprinkleeninow | Jul 2022 | #18 | |
Ms. Toad | Jul 2022 | #7 | |
Ocelot II | Jul 2022 | #19 | |
Ms. Toad | Jul 2022 | #22 | |
Ocelot II | Jul 2022 | #23 | |
Ms. Toad | Jul 2022 | #24 | |
JI7 | Jul 2022 | #8 | |
area51 | Jul 2022 | #14 | |
moonshinegnomie | Jul 2022 | #17 | |
wnylib | Jul 2022 | #16 | |
FoxNewsSucks | Jul 2022 | #4 | |
msongs | Jul 2022 | #5 | |
womanofthehills | Jul 2022 | #12 | |
TDale313 | Jul 2022 | #6 | |
womanofthehills | Jul 2022 | #15 | |
Dr. Shepper | Jul 2022 | #9 | |
moonshinegnomie | Jul 2022 | #10 | |
Cha | Jul 2022 | #11 | |
edbermac | Jul 2022 | #13 | |
Dave says | Jul 2022 | #20 | |
Pete Ross Junior | Jul 2022 | #21 |
Response to Comfortably_Numb (Original post)
Fri Jul 8, 2022, 11:21 PM
Ocelot II (108,749 posts)
1. It's not over. Twitter is suing Musk for breach of contract,
and the remedy could be specific performance - that is, the court enforces the contract and orders Musk to buy Twitter as agreed.
|
Response to Ocelot II (Reply #1)
Fri Jul 8, 2022, 11:25 PM
Comfortably_Numb (3,062 posts)
2. Good point, and spot on. I'll bail again if he ends up owning it.
Response to Comfortably_Numb (Reply #2)
Fri Jul 8, 2022, 11:31 PM
Blue Owl (44,876 posts)
3. Fatfuck von ToiletTweeter is lurking in the shadows
Biding his turdly time….
|
Response to Blue Owl (Reply #3)
Sat Jul 9, 2022, 03:55 AM
sprinkleeninow (19,132 posts)
18. you have a way with...
Response to Ocelot II (Reply #1)
Sat Jul 9, 2022, 12:09 AM
Ms. Toad (31,762 posts)
7. Generally, if you can provide an appropriate remedy by throwing money at it,
the non-breaching party is not entitled to specific performance.
|
Response to Ms. Toad (Reply #7)
Sat Jul 9, 2022, 09:36 AM
Ocelot II (108,749 posts)
19. Generally, yes, but this contract has a specific performance clause.
So Musk might find himself on the hook to buy the company at the agreed-upon price, even though it isn't worth as much as it was when they made the deal - in part because of Musk's own fuckery. That's why Twitter will want to enforce the contract.
|
Response to Ocelot II (Reply #19)
Sat Jul 9, 2022, 01:02 PM
Ms. Toad (31,762 posts)
22. I know why they want to enforce it
But liquidated damages clauses are generally monetary, not an obligation to perform what the contract required them to do in the first place. To be enforceable, the remedy has to be a reasonable estimate, at the time the parties entered into the contract for the damages (difficult to ascertain at the time of contracting). Specific performance isn't an estimate of the damages.
The decision about specific performance iwill be left to the curt as an equitable remedy if no amount of money would be adequate to compensate the injured party. Seems to me that it is relatively easy to calculate Twitter's loss from the agreed upon price compared to the current price. Twitter keeps its company at a lower value; Musk pays a hefty price for breaching the contract. |
Response to Ms. Toad (Reply #22)
Sat Jul 9, 2022, 04:28 PM
Ocelot II (108,749 posts)
23. I don't want him to buy it; I hope he has to pay through the nose
to get out of the contract, and that’s probably what will happen.
|
Response to Ocelot II (Reply #23)
Sat Jul 9, 2022, 04:50 PM
Ms. Toad (31,762 posts)
24. Agreed as to what will probalby happen. n/t
Response to Ocelot II (Reply #1)
Sat Jul 9, 2022, 12:09 AM
JI7 (87,922 posts)
8. Can't he just pay the billion or whatever that was to get out of it ?
Wasn't that part of the "deal" ? That if he backed out he would pay a billion .
|
Response to JI7 (Reply #8)
Sat Jul 9, 2022, 01:32 AM
area51 (11,188 posts)
14. That's what I heard. n/t
Response to JI7 (Reply #8)
Sat Jul 9, 2022, 01:58 AM
moonshinegnomie (1,289 posts)
17. no
the 1B is if a 3rd party were to block the deal
the contract has a specific performance clause that can force must to buy them comany even if he doesnt want to any more https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1418091/000119312522120474/d310843ddefa14a.htm |
Response to Ocelot II (Reply #1)
Sat Jul 9, 2022, 01:46 AM
wnylib (18,134 posts)
16. Could it be that Musk is complaining about
the number of fake accounts as a means of bringing down the price? He claims that Twitter did not live up to its part of the bargain so he does not have to live up to his original offer?
|
Response to Comfortably_Numb (Original post)
Fri Jul 8, 2022, 11:41 PM
FoxNewsSucks (10,153 posts)
4. Never used it,
never will.
Regardless of owner. |
Response to Comfortably_Numb (Original post)
Fri Jul 8, 2022, 11:50 PM
msongs (65,521 posts)
5. twitter is swamped with trump propaganda even tho he is technically banned nt
Response to msongs (Reply #5)
Sat Jul 9, 2022, 01:29 AM
womanofthehills (7,492 posts)
12. Disagree - Twitter is about who you choose to follow
You can design Twitter to your liking.
|
Response to Comfortably_Numb (Original post)
Sat Jul 9, 2022, 12:05 AM
TDale313 (7,763 posts)
6. I didn't leave.
I would have if it became clear the deal was actually going to go through. But it started feeling unlikely within a couple days. I am glad it fell through. He should not own Twitter.
|
Response to TDale313 (Reply #6)
Sat Jul 9, 2022, 01:33 AM
womanofthehills (7,492 posts)
15. But should a Saudi prince own part of Twitter?
Saudi prince, who is major Twitter shareholder, rejects Elon Musk offer to buy company
https://finance.yahoo.com/news/saudi-prince-major-twitter-shareholder-171929382.html |
Response to Comfortably_Numb (Original post)
Sat Jul 9, 2022, 12:57 AM
Dr. Shepper (2,956 posts)
9. I blocked him a few weeks back and forgot he even
Existed. Bliss.
|
Response to Comfortably_Numb (Original post)
Sat Jul 9, 2022, 01:05 AM
moonshinegnomie (1,289 posts)
10. the contract he signed includes a specific performance clause
it basically says Twitter can force musk to buy them. there is precedence for this in the past in other mergers.
|
Response to Comfortably_Numb (Original post)
Sat Jul 9, 2022, 01:11 AM
Cha (286,361 posts)
11. This Shareholder feels like we do..
Link to tweet I never left... I stayed to fight like George Takei. ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Response to Comfortably_Numb (Original post)
Sat Jul 9, 2022, 01:29 AM
edbermac (15,711 posts)
13. Not yet. I got booted for calling Jason Aldean a dumb redneck
I guess that’s the Twitter equivalent of the N-word
|
Response to Comfortably_Numb (Original post)
Sat Jul 9, 2022, 10:13 AM
Dave says (4,359 posts)
20. My Twitter timeline has, just this morning,
Turned in to a MAGA cesspool. Normally it’s populated with art and left-wing politics. Now it’s ‘Biden is dirt’ and stories about women claiming they should have the right to claim a zygote on their taxes (given the absurdity of the SCOTUS Roe decision, they should).
Something is newly amiss over there. |
Response to Comfortably_Numb (Original post)
Sat Jul 9, 2022, 10:16 AM
Pete Ross Junior (404 posts)
21. Never was on Twitter in the first place.
I speculate the rich man baby is quietly shorting Twitter using an intermediary.
|