Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

PETRUS

(3,678 posts)
Sat Jan 14, 2012, 07:50 PM Jan 2012

We need a new economics

From Econ4's mission statement, a passage outlining the four necessary components of a new, better economy:

" A level playing field: Every child ought to have equivalent opportunities for economic advancement. A child’s life chances should not depend upon accidents of birth such as race, gender, or parental income. Access to food, health care, education, and a clean and safe environment are basic human rights. These are not commodities that ought to be allocated on the basis of purchasing power, nor privileges to be bestowed on the basis of political power. A level playing field requires fairness in the distribution of these elements of private and social wealth.

Resilience: A healthy economy is a resilient economy able to withstand unanticipated shocks. To borrow a metaphor from the physical sciences, resilience is the ability to bounce without breaking. We can build resilience into our economy and its infrastructure by following the design principles of diversity and dispersion. The aim is not to maximize “efficiency” at a single point in time, but rather to minimize economic vulnerability over time.

True-cost pricing: The prices that guide economic decisions in markets and government policies must be based on a full accounting of costs and benefits. When costs such as pollution – or benefits such as care for children and the elderly – are hidden from view, the result is implicit subsidies and taxes that deflect incentives away from the goal of long-run well-being. Costs that are hidden from view can grow over time, as in the case of global warming pollution; and benefits that are hidden from view can erode over time, as in the provision of unpaid labor for care of dependents. A full accounting of costs and benefits does not mean that non-monetary aspects of well-being such as liberty, community, and life expectancy must be translated into dollars and cents. It means that non-market values should not be ignored and thereby effectively valued at zero.

Real democracy: An effective economy requires transparency, accountability, and democratic governance. Institutions in the private, non-profit and public sectors alike will serve long-run well-being only if safeguarded from capture by powerful players pursuing their own myopic self-interest. This can be secured only by a democratic distribution of power. A central goal of education, including economics education, must be to equip students for a life of active citizenship."

More here - http://econ4.org/about/mission

Thoughts?

11 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

PETRUS

(3,678 posts)
2. That's a perfectly good place to start.
Sat Jan 14, 2012, 08:30 PM
Jan 2012

After all, corporations don't exist in nature. (It's questionable whether or not they're even consistent with the idea of a "free market" given their various state-guaranteed protections and privileges.) They are products of legislation, and dependent upon the judicial and executive functions of government as well. And, as we know, government derives its legitimacy from the consent of the governed.

For that matter, much of what allows business to operate are legal structures - property rights, contract law, etc. If the current framework fails to "promote the general Welfare" - we should change it.

marginlized

(357 posts)
3. Society attributes all manner of evil intent to Corps.
Sat Jan 14, 2012, 08:38 PM
Jan 2012

But they're really just doing what they're designed to do: make money.
So the 'easy solution', what you're suggestion, is to simply redefine their charter. Redesign what corporations do.

ThomThom

(1,486 posts)
10. yes, do away with it/them
Sun Jan 15, 2012, 02:06 AM
Jan 2012

Why do we need corporations? At least limit them and stop them owning other corporations. Break them up and give other people a chance in the market, some real competition would be nice.

zeemike

(18,998 posts)
4. How about a Jubilee year
Sat Jan 14, 2012, 08:41 PM
Jan 2012

Where all debt is forgiven...that would change everything....suddenly people would be flush with money to spend.

zeemike

(18,998 posts)
9. I like the way you ended that...
Sat Jan 14, 2012, 11:43 PM
Jan 2012

Got something against it?....go to hell.
It is like throwing it right back in the face of the faux Christian who wants us to believe we will go there if we follow the way that works for all.

 

WingDinger

(3,690 posts)
11. I do that a lot. Turn their pet phrases against them. Then they spend an inordinate amount of time
Sun Jan 15, 2012, 12:59 PM
Jan 2012

explaining how, nah uh, it is you liberals that do that.

Nova.

(14 posts)
6. I'm all for heterodox, but...
Sat Jan 14, 2012, 09:25 PM
Jan 2012

Capitalism is a system that will always progress to a similar way as it has done with wealth and property concentration; to undo a lot of the transition that has happened in the last 40 years or so is much better than doing nothing, but I think instead it would be better to use the growing public frustration to make economic change that will introduce a system that could maintain the principles that the text advocates, instead of rewinding the clock and adding a few intentional beneficial features.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»We need a new economics