General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsDevastating.
The Boss Will See You Now
Zephyr Teachout
We are experiencing a major turning point in the surveillance of workers, driven by wearable tech, artificial intelligence, and Covid.
Several decades ago, when I first moved to New York City, I answered an ad to be a personal assistant to a writer. I imagined myself as amanuensis, translating inspired pronouncements into poems. Instead, I ordered and returned sweaters, scheduled haircuts, and made three-course-meal seating plans for members of the literati whom I never got to meet. My boss, her money-manager husband, and their children lived on Park Avenue, in a penthouse with Georgian drapes and triple-insulated soundproof windows. She collected bespoke services: personal trainers, personal shoppers, a personal poetry trainer, a personal opera coach. I was one of four full-time staff, along with two live-in Irish nannies and a French maid. During our thirty-minute lunchtime, the four of us would hurry into the kitchen to use the small gold-handled faucet that produced instant boiling water to make tea and soup. We slurped and laughed and complained about our boss.
During one of these meals, the chief nanny began a call on the phone in the corner, then quickly slammed down the receiver. Pointing to its golden handle, she mouthed that she thought our boss was listening in. As we huddled over our soup, I said that our boss was always asking me for reports of what we talked about, and the nanny whispered that she was pretty sure she had seen her lurking outside the kitchen door. This was funny for a moment, and then nota thin skein of anxiety started winding its way across the room.
A few weeks later, the maid was fired. It wasnt clear that her dismissal was related to anything that had been said. But once paranoia gets its claws in you, it doesnt let go easily. Our wages and raises were all unpredictable. Two of the staff relied on green cards. These circumstances, which had been the subject of so many conversations, suddenly became the source of insecurity. We gradually, then all at once, stopped having lunch together.
I have lately been thinking of that small discouraging experience as we live through an explosion of corporate investments in workplace surveillance. The year 1995, when I had that job, seems almost embarrassingly quaint, an era of surveillance innocence. There was no Facebook or Google following people everywhere they went, no spooky personalized ads. Back then, Americans spent an average of thirty minutes a month online, and 24/7 intimate surveillance was reserved for targets of FBI investigations.
At the dozen-plus places I had worked by the age of twenty-four, I punched in and out, sped up my dishwashing when the supervisor came through, weighed the beans I picked, bargained to get off early in exchange for cleaning extra bathrooms, and wrote reports for the third-grade teacher I assisted in the classroom. Even the tips I received while waitressing were my business, not the restaurants. My bosses knew me superficiallymy clothes, my general productivitynot what I thought or felt outside the workplace, unless I chose to share it.
https://www.nybooks.com/articles/2022/08/18/the-boss-will-see-you-now-zephyr-teachout/
If you can access the article its well worth reading. We need legislation to protect peoples privacy and to insure workplace fairness.
Faux pas
(14,657 posts)been wondering where Zephyr been. She used to be a guest on msnnc a lot years ago.
Pinback
(12,153 posts)Bookmarking. Its difficult to avoid the machinery of surveillance capitalism these days., but many of us are trying hard to minimize its insidious effects.
Many assume, wrongly, that if they dont feel inconvenienced by the constant presence of Big Brother 21st century style its nothing to worry about. I appreciate an important activist and educator like Prof. Teachout offering her thoughts on the subject.
canuckledragger
(1,636 posts)The keypress is just a central location where we get our keys to clean our assigned buildings with.
We went decades without a need for anything of the sort...and then a corrupt, self-serving asshole was put in charge of our dept. The camera in question looks you right in the face when you sign in to get your keys (something else we never needed either, ID card access for keys)
The first chance I got I pulled out the wires in back that connected it.
The camera didn't make the workplace safer, didn't improve efficiency, etc. It's only purpose for being there was to spy on us. It's only effect was to make us that much more distrustful of abusive management.
And because our management team is also very incompetent...they haven't even noticed in almost a year. Should they figure it out and plug the wire back in, I'll use crazy glue on the connector.
jmbar2
(4,869 posts)I am so sorry that folks have to endure this kind of workplace. I was hoping that the supposed worker shortage might make employers give some slack, but I guess not.
Hekate
(90,617 posts)jmbar2
(4,869 posts)I've been disturbed lately by the growth of invasive employment practices - personality tests, skill tests, resume screening, and now employment surveillance - that generates discrimination and inequality.
The surveillance described in that article is deeply disturbing. So glad that I'm retired.
On a related note, I recently saw a good documentary -- "Persona"-- that looks personality testing in employment - another disturbing trend with very dark implications for individuals and society.
The HR and exec types who buy all this slave technology aren't considering the ethics of such technology. Perhaps there needs to be a lot more education on ethics in business schools.
canuckledragger
(1,636 posts)...knowing that they're used to try and screen out 'undesirables' (meaning people that think and stand up for themselves)
jmbar2
(4,869 posts)I had so many bad bosses and managers over my career. What traits do they prefer that create so much bad management?
Pinback
(12,153 posts)were keys to success in most places I worked. Very few managers really are leaders. I was lucky to work with a select few who were, but I knew my share of of blowhards and bullies, too.
I generally didn't make waves, but I didn't suck up either. I tried to be a team player and get my work done, but work was never the most important thing in my life -- well, aside from that whole "roof over head and feeding the family" thing.
Glad to be retired now, that's for damn sure.
Mme. Defarge
(8,023 posts)As of January 2011. Got out before this would have affected me.
I actually went into HR to try to make work better for people, having experienced very poor treatment as an exempt employee - exempt meaning exempt from the protection as of the Fair Labor Standards Act. That legislation needs to be updated to address what is really 21st Century slavery.
At this stage of my life Im really dependent on a corrupt and malevolent goods and services distribution system to take care of my needs. Still, I try to avoid supporting any form of animal cruelty. So why not name and shame and boycott companies that exploit and dehumanize their employees?
jmbar2
(4,869 posts)I too trained for an HR career, on the training side. My professors were all scholars from what seems to be a more humane era in the 50s and 60s.
We had a lot of classes that touched on the myriad ethical issues in the employment relationship, including individual, corporate and societal effects of employment policy.
I think the whole HR field has gotten too focused on trying to justify their own value to the company, to the point where they morphed into the organization prison guards. The new technologies just improve their ability to police, rank, rate and eliminate others.
There's no one left in companies to speak up for the workers. We need more unions.
Ferrets are Cool
(21,105 posts)mostly.
FakeNoose
(32,613 posts)... is almost as interesting as the article she wrote for The New York Review.
(link) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zephyr_Teachout
She's a full-time professor at Fordham Law School. She's active in the Democratic Party of NY. As recently as 2018 she ran for State Attorney General, finishing 2nd in the primary to Letitia James. She has published several books and articles on law and political themes. Occasional she has acted in summer stock theater. Hmmm that's quite a list of accomplishments.
I do agree with her thesis here, in that employers have encroached on workers' privacy to the point of almost cringe-worthiness.
Mme. Defarge
(8,023 posts)I had never heard of her until reading her NYRB article. Now, Ill keep an eye out for her work.
Johnny2X2X
(19,015 posts)Labor has more power right now than in decades. Organize and do not tolerate these types of working conditions!