General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forumsempedocles
(15,751 posts)empedocles
(15,751 posts)are coordinatorting the coordinators
[More to it than usual suspects like Koch/Mercer, the Federalist Society types, etc.]
ThoughtCriminal
(14,047 posts)Last edited Thu Sep 1, 2022, 12:00 PM - Edit history (1)
Hitler was arrested and sent to prison for a year. In 1933 he became Chancellor.
Cosmocat
(14,563 posts)This is how this is tracking ...
PufPuf23
(8,767 posts)Vote counting in Florida was disrupted.
Roger Stone led the Brooks Brothers Riot.
Gore would have won if the count had continued under protocol but the headed to rogue USSC stopped the count.
FakeNoose
(32,628 posts)The Repukes' only hope is to win the House, and we have to make sure that doesn't happen. IF they're stupid enough to choose Chump as their candidate in 2024, well ... they don't deserve to win ANYTHING ever again.
Aristus
(66,316 posts)As admirable a job as the Capitol security did on January 6th, they learned a lot from it, and will no doubt be better prepared if another one happens.
House of Roberts
(5,168 posts)if Joe Biden is President.
Aristus
(66,316 posts)TheRealNorth
(9,478 posts)Or that the Republicans on SCOTUS will rule that they are within the law. That is why the North Carolina case is crucial with regards to the Republican's "Independent State Legislature theory", where state courts, the legislature, previously passed laws, or a state's constitution cannot limit a state legislature's ability to choose the presidential electors.
newdayneeded
(1,955 posts)There won't be bike rack fencing and a several dozen officers simply pushing back this time. The ground will be full of coup blood. Orders will be given to treat these dirt bags exactly as they are.....invading terrorists!
wnylib
(21,428 posts)not be an attack on buildings like the Capitol or the White House. It will be just what the OP says - state legislatures empowered to overturn results that they don't like and name their own winner.
That will, of course, result in angry protests from the disenfranchised voters. Then states will crack down harshly on the protesters. At that point it will get more violent. Fighting in the streets, declarations of emergency and martial law. Martial law will be enforced by militias in red states, not by the National Guard. Some former and active Guard members will also be militia members, as will several former and current police officers.
A massive storming of the Capitol again seems unlikely.
Kaleva
(36,294 posts)I don't understand why some here assume TFG is smart, can learn from his mistakes and his inner circle are intelligent, practical people.
There is ample evidence that supports the argument that none of the above is true .
TheRealNorth
(9,478 posts)It is about Republicans making it harder for Democrats to vote, and even if Democrats win a state like Wisconsin, Georgia, Arizona, Pennsylvania, or Michigan, that the gerrymandered Republican state legislatures in those states will ignore the popular vote and choose who will get the state's presidential electors.
It could be DeathSatan and not TFG. Or Tom Cotton.
Kaleva
(36,294 posts)Gerrymandered districts in favour of Republicans cannot come before legit R control of state legislatures.
TheRealNorth
(9,478 posts)You are basically saying gerrymandering is okay because at some point a non-gerrymandered legislature did it.
I mean, we are getting in the realm of what is law vs what is just, but if the state legislature at some point decides to apportion votes by land area and not population, I am not going to take that shit regardless of its "legitamacy".
Kaleva
(36,294 posts)The point I clearly made was that in order for Republicans to gerrymander districts in their favor was that they'd have to first win legit elections in order to gain control of state legislatures.
Thus it behoves us to work hard as we each can to elect enough Democrats in critical states so that D's control the state legislatures in same states.
TheRealNorth
(9,478 posts)The whole purpose of the gerrymandering is to prevent Democrats from winning a majority even in D+10 elections.
It sounds like you are legitimizing their steal of the 2024 election because, "hey, we could have theoretically won those legislative seats." I could theoretically win PowerBall too, but that doesn't make playing the lottery a smart retirement strategy.
Fuck that noise. That sort of thinking is what got us here.
Kaleva
(36,294 posts)Thud the way to prevent them from gaining such control is to defeat them on election day. If they have control, that makes the task harder but still doable.
So "vote harder." My guess is that you never had to wait 6-12 hours to cast a ballot like some people do. Never had to travel to a polling location without a car or convenient mass transit. And you have maybe an hour to do it because you had to work to 6 and the polls close at 7. Or maybe the bus stops running.
I am not going to legitimize this bullshit like you are. But hey, I guess that let's you off the hook when it comes time to fight back. Because "the people" voted for Fascism.
Kaleva
(36,294 posts)the disenfranchising of voters and such. My guess is that you are doing pretty much what I'm doing. We are both voting harder and encouraging others to vote and supporting candidates and we do this by following the rules and obeying the laws.
Cosmocat
(14,563 posts)In PA, EVERYONE knows if Mastriano wins gov, he will appoint people to do just this.
uponit7771
(90,335 posts)... if they lose like the CSA.
Best to stop them before they get started
Kaleva
(36,294 posts)Prevent them from gaining the power in the first place.
Montauk6
(8,075 posts)When they couldn't trip it up from below, they aimed for the top 8 years later.
Kaleva
(36,294 posts)Montauk6
(8,075 posts)ThoughtCriminal
(14,047 posts)Control of state legislatures is the cornerstone of the Republican anti-democracy strategy.
They currently rule 61 out of 98 state chambers that have one-party control.
crickets
(25,962 posts)Obviously the national races are paramount, but the Democratic party often does not pay enough attention to state (Sec of State) and local (school board) races - to everyone's peril.
Your point about state legislatures is well taken. Governorships are also key: in some cases, federal programs and funds are deliberately ignored, mismanaged, or outright turned down by Repub governors. It's frustrating when Dems on the federal level finally get something done for everyone, but at the state level, Repubs find a way to block it.
They are disenfranchising voters.
fightforfreedom
(4,913 posts)The Republicans are going to lose. Paranoia will destroy ya.
IrishAfricanAmerican
(3,815 posts)Turnout cancels out all of their dirty tricks.
#GOTV!
flying_wahini
(6,589 posts)liberalla
(9,237 posts)trip things up. I hope the SC doesn't give them the reins.
Liberal In Texas
(13,546 posts)It hasn't been stopped.
That's why the DOJ needs to start charging the criminals.
TheRealNorth
(9,478 posts)Just "Vote Harder"
If we crawl naked over broken glass to vote and still manage to win 70% of the vote, things can change.
Whoops, my mistake, we needed to win a supermajority to overcome the vetoes.
Kaleva
(36,294 posts)Voting harder I imagine. Like most everyone else here. I seriously doubt you are operating outside the law. I also doubt you aren't doing anything at all other then posting on DU.
TheRealNorth
(9,478 posts)Rather than acknowledging that we could come to a point, possibly as soon as 2024, where our votes are being tossed aside because of the rigged system Republicans have set up.
https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2022/07/moore-harper-scotus-independent-state-legislature-election-power/670992/
(excerpt)
How Six States Could Overturn the 2024 Election
The Supreme Court may let state legislatures decide the presidency.
Late last month, in one of its final acts of the term, the Supreme Court queued up another potentially precedent-wrecking decision for next year. The Courts agreement to hear Moore v. Harper, a North Carolina redistricting case, isnt just bad news for efforts to control gerrymandering. The Courts right-wing supermajority is poised to let state lawmakers overturn voters choice in presidential elections.
To understand the stakes, and the motives of Republicans who brought the case, you need only one strategic fact of political arithmetic. Six swing statesPennsylvania, Michigan, Wisconsin, Arizona, Georgia, and North Carolinaare trending blue in presidential elections but ruled by gerrymandered Republican state legislatures. No comparable red-trending states are locked into Democratic legislatures.
Joe Biden won five of those six swing states in 2020. Donald Trump then tried and failed, lawlessly, to muscle the GOP state legislators into discarding Bidens victory and appointing Trump electors instead. The Moore case marks the debut in the nations highest court of a dubious theory that could give Republicans legal cover in 2024 to do as Trump demanded in 2020. And if democracy is subverted in just a few states, it can overturn the election nationwide.
Kaleva
(36,294 posts)For Republicans to gerrymander districts, they first need to gain control of state legislatures and to do that, they need to win elections. I also said the way to counter that is to win elections.
I then asked you what you are doing to fight gerrymandering and voter disenfranchisement. The reason I asked that is one can tell just how important an issue is to someone by how vigorous their response is to the issue. The more resources a person expends and the amount of personal risk they are willing to take on in dealing with the issue, the more important it is. People risked their lives, and some lost their lives, fighting for what they believed in. This is human nature
So, what are you doing to fight voter disenfranchisement? As I said before, I suspect you are doing what I'm doing. We are voting harder. If so, the issue is of equal importance to us. It's the actions one takes in responding to an issue that matters and not the rhetoric on social media.