General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsI like this guy's take - he was one of the NY AG Trump University prosecutors
Link to tweet
Link to tweet
Link to tweet
Link to tweet
Link to tweet
Link to tweet
intrepidity
(7,275 posts)follow all the J6 leads they have gotten.
But, ok, sure.
Ocelot II
(115,584 posts)I've said all along that this is kind of a side show and the investigation will continue because the contents of the documents never really mattered in the first place. This judge has made a right ass of herself but the show will go on.
reACTIONary
(5,767 posts)G2theD
(593 posts)OMGWTF
(3,939 posts)G2theD
(593 posts)He is meticulous and always gets his man.
The evidence is undeniable on the obstruction charge as well as possessing the documents.
I am however concerned that he will not be indicted for anything. At the same time, does Garland really want to prove once and for all that justice isnt blind and some people are indeed above the law?
femmedem
(8,196 posts)Jarqui
(10,121 posts)There is a thread on here covering emptywheel's concerns
https://twitter.com/emptywheel
This Prof had a very interesting take
https://twitter.com/OrinKerr
1st post of several
Link to tweet
Someone else did a Neal Katyal thread on DU.com
Link to tweet
Bradley Moss has posted some good comments on this case.
Here's a couple of tweets from today
Link to tweet
Link to tweet
Andrew Weissmann
Link to tweet
Link to tweet
Link to tweet
Link to tweet
Link to tweet
Glenn Kirschner
Link to tweet
Link to tweet
Lawrence Tribe
Link to tweet
Link to tweet
George Conway
Link to tweet
Link to tweet
Link to tweet
Many others below
Link to tweet
Link to tweet
Link to tweet
Link to tweet
Link to tweet
Link to tweet
Link to tweet
Link to tweet
Link to tweet
Link to tweet
Link to tweet
Link to tweet
Link to tweet
And there are more comments when you go to their twitter pages.
I'm sure there are many more people I've missed.
I did not see much in support of the judge.
I think the various opinions from all of these legal/law enforcement types is overwhelmingly against this judge's decision
crickets
(25,951 posts)I'm hoping all of this transforms from Twitter storms to RL consequences that include one very embarrassed judge whose ruling gets tossed out with the trash.
Jarqui
(10,121 posts)When they do, they would have an FBI agent submit a declaration saying they need the docs for fingerprinting, etc to allow the Security investigation to proceed (roughly). That puts her in a bind.
I felt they should add a declaration from the White House claiming executive privilege on all the Presidential documents. That would wipe out the Special Master for executive privilege.
They could also provide rebuttal to a few of her inventions.
Then, if the judge still turns DoJ down, they have a more solid foundation for appeal.
But even if she presses on, they've taken a bunch out of her decision and may well not need to appeal.
I think this decision is a time wasting nuisance due to its poor quality. But that's all.
wnylib
(21,324 posts)crickets
(25,951 posts)It's not the DOJ's first rodeo. They may have more up their sleeves than they've been able to share up to now. I know this sounds pollyanna-ish, but the tone of their last filing and the fact that they released such an incriminating photo with it leads me to believe they are in dog-with-a-bone mode. They have their quarry in their teeth and will not be letting him go.
It's difficult, but I've been trying not to get too riled about today, since the holiday meant that this wasn't a normal news day. tfg shopping for a judge, having the judge bend over backward (badly) for him, timing the release for a holiday... it's so maddening, but it's vintage stuff. 🙄
Tomorrow's news may change my mind, but that's tomorrow. Who knows? DOJ may smack things around again in the news first thing in the morning. We'll see.
Thread unroll for easier reading: https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1566875526563856385.html
mrsadm
(1,198 posts)czarjak
(11,253 posts)YoshidaYui
(41,818 posts)And bad news for Trump.