Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
126 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Complaint filed with 11th Court of Appeals against Judge Cannon (Original Post) LetMyPeopleVote Sep 2022 OP
K & R malaise Sep 2022 #1
That's what I'm wondering AZSkiffyGeek Sep 2022 #9
They file a complaint with the clerk of the Court of Appeals DetroitLegalBeagle Sep 2022 #12
I believe this is a writ of mandamus. ancianita Sep 2022 #47
Is there a link to what they actually filed? onenote Sep 2022 #56
I'll try and find it. Hold on... ancianita Sep 2022 #59
Looks like the justice.gov site doesn't have any news beyond Sept 2, and ancianita Sep 2022 #62
This isn't a complaint filed by DOJ. It's some silly group with no standing onenote Sep 2022 #65
Complaint is better than an appeal, because it puts the judge's bad behavior on record. TigressDem Sep 2022 #79
Those"complaint" is a toothless publicity stunt onenote Sep 2022 #115
Well that's a fun gambit ... Volaris Sep 2022 #64
A writ of mandamus is anything but a gambit. ancianita Sep 2022 #76
You keep saying this is a writ of mandamus onenote Sep 2022 #81
Understood. I'm talking about the DOJ and you're explaining that it's CTA. I get that. ancianita Sep 2022 #101
What I meant by that is, it's filed by peeps that don't seem to have standing. Volaris Sep 2022 #83
It doesn't as is explained in several of the posts down thread. onenote Sep 2022 #55
Excellent! 👏👏👏👏 SheltieLover Sep 2022 #2
2/3rd of the senate will be difficult to get jimfields33 Sep 2022 #3
Reason enough to do it. calimary Sep 2022 #34
Great news..thx for posting! PortTack Sep 2022 #4
Judge Loose Cannon trapped like a rat! GreenWave Sep 2022 #5
We need that on a bumper sticker. nt TigressDem Sep 2022 #80
YES!!! secondwind Sep 2022 #6
Impeachment or possible criminal charges yankee87 Sep 2022 #7
Yes!! agingdem Sep 2022 #8
I've decided that I am in favor of this action. dchill Sep 2022 #10
The complaint is not serious former9thward Sep 2022 #11
And, from the FAQ pages about filing a complaint about a federal judge: Ocelot II Sep 2022 #14
The sheer fact that she took the case... Let's see how the case was randomly assigned. onecaliberal Sep 2022 #26
Thank you for the clear headed explanation question everything Sep 2022 #28
Thanks, Ocelot SCantiGOP Sep 2022 #53
If some ambitious investigative journalist wnylib Sep 2022 #67
I would love it if it were true SCantiGOP Sep 2022 #69
+10 nt reACTIONary Sep 2022 #112
exactly the confirmation I expected to find, intuiting it was click bait, then bam there it is. msfiddlestix Sep 2022 #15
oops duplicate.. msfiddlestix Sep 2022 #17
Thank you. BlackSkimmer Sep 2022 #25
Wondered about this. One has to click on the links and with luck will not question everything Sep 2022 #27
Post removed Post removed Sep 2022 #31
You are the only poster who disagreed with me. former9thward Sep 2022 #33
Any thoughts on Judge Cannon? BradAllison Sep 2022 #35
I have never heard of her previous to this motion. former9thward Sep 2022 #37
Uh huh. BradAllison Sep 2022 #39
Brilliant riposte! BlackSkimmer Sep 2022 #41
What an utterly bizarre insinuation. tritsofme Sep 2022 #36
Ad hominem attacks. BlackSkimmer Sep 2022 #40
What is you're opinion of the judge? BradAllison Sep 2022 #42
First of all, "you're " is a contraction of you and are. BlackSkimmer Sep 2022 #46
Post removed Post removed Sep 2022 #49
I did answer you. Oh dear. BlackSkimmer Sep 2022 #50
And another personal attack. BlackSkimmer Sep 2022 #51
Yep. I agree. This won't get anywhere. Solomon Sep 2022 #32
So what? Why not try? Everyone said Trump's motion wouldn't go anywhere. SunSeeker Sep 2022 #87
Barbara McQuade just said the DOJ could move the case to DC jurisdiction since the crime occurred PortTack Sep 2022 #13
Barbara McQuade Says A Lot Of Things That Are No Longer Based In Reality SoCalDavidS Sep 2022 #21
So why didn't the DOJ move for a change of venue? onenote Sep 2022 #54
Was just asking, because I didn't know PortTack Sep 2022 #57
You can't really think the DOJ attorneys weren't capable of making that motion onenote Sep 2022 #58
Retired medical professional here...that's why I ask..I have no idea, while many here do PortTack Sep 2022 #74
I can't see how she would know that FBaggins Sep 2022 #113
Who are these people bringing suit? nt Samrob Sep 2022 #16
They have no standing is my guess Bobstandard Sep 2022 #18
They're based in Bethesda so you're probably right. live love laugh Sep 2022 #84
It is not a lawsuit. Anyone can submit a complaint about a judge. SunSeeker Sep 2022 #92
I've asked twice. BlackSkimmer Sep 2022 #24
Look them up on Facebook. SunSeeker Sep 2022 #93
"Verified by Facebook." BlackSkimmer Sep 2022 #94
Why are you so angry at this group? SunSeeker Sep 2022 #95
they are a political advocasy group, not a legal organization Takket Sep 2022 #73
It's not that kind of complaint. It is not a lawsuit. It is a misconduct complaint. SunSeeker Sep 2022 #88
Call to Activism has been pushed popular tweeter JoJoFromJerz (and lately Brian Karem, too) Roland99 Sep 2022 #105
Has anyone checked on Cannon's citizenship? otchmoson Sep 2022 #19
Why are you curious? AZSkiffyGeek Sep 2022 #44
After all the grief Obama went through with the birthers otchmoson Sep 2022 #63
You don't think the Senate confirmation process would have checked? FBaggins Sep 2022 #90
this one needs to go back in the box stopdiggin Sep 2022 #120
The grief Obama went through Zeitghost Sep 2022 #124
This won't go anywhere. Ocelot II Sep 2022 #20
Helpful info. nt BootinUp Sep 2022 #75
Plus, do they have standing on this issue? Layzeebeaver Sep 2022 #108
I believe there is a lot more to this than just a simple challenge of the "correctness" of a Maraya1969 Sep 2022 #114
👇👇👇 Goonch Sep 2022 #22
You keep posting this. Who are these people? BlackSkimmer Sep 2022 #23
They have 732,600 followers as of this moment. They follow 1700++ Lettuce Be Sep 2022 #29
And who are they! BlackSkimmer Sep 2022 #38
They are a progressive social media activist group. They've been on Twitter since 2017. SunSeeker Sep 2022 #91
I don't think their activism is based in altruism. quaint Sep 2022 #30
It's based on viral clickbait AZSkiffyGeek Sep 2022 #43
yeah...see my post #105 Roland99 Sep 2022 #106
Recommended. H2O Man Sep 2022 #45
Can you show us a copy of this "complaint"? BlackSkimmer Sep 2022 #48
Learned behavior says 48656c6c6f20 Sep 2022 #52
Outstanding. Now we tap Hillary Clinton for SM . She has the credentials and clearances. Handler Sep 2022 #60
Thank-you thank-you thank-you vlyons Sep 2022 #61
K&R UTUSN Sep 2022 #66
KnR Hekate Sep 2022 #68
Does this group have standing? Just A Box Of Rain Sep 2022 #70
You can file a complaint against Judge Cannon in the 11th Circuit. Check out http://uscourts.gov. LetMyPeopleVote Sep 2022 #71
You can, but - Ocelot II Sep 2022 #77
Her opinion showed a bias in favor of Trump. That is grounds for a complaint. SunSeeker Sep 2022 #86
Why are you wasting our time with this? SlimJimmy Sep 2022 #72
Do you speak for everyone here, or were you using the royal "our"? nt SunSeeker Sep 2022 #89
Sorry SlimJimmy Sep 2022 #96
Why the hostility to a group just trying to get an anti-Trump & Pro-Biden message out? SunSeeker Sep 2022 #97
I'm not being hostile. But until it's the DoJ making the complaint or appeal SlimJimmy Sep 2022 #98
Everyone has a right to file a complaint about bad judge. SunSeeker Sep 2022 #100
Check it out. It's just a way for them to get views SlimJimmy Sep 2022 #103
What's wrong with pro-Democratic groups trying to get views? SunSeeker Sep 2022 #104
Fine, have at it. SlimJimmy Sep 2022 #110
might be because - repeating for clarity, "Wasting our time" stopdiggin Sep 2022 #121
If it's such a waste of time, why are you posting in this thread? SunSeeker Sep 2022 #123
K&R K& R K&R K&R K& R K&R K&R K& R K&R TigressDem Sep 2022 #78
K&R Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Sep 2022 #82
Meanwhile, I read her being considered for next Republican pick SC opening? Brainfodder Sep 2022 #85
"This judge will have to answer this complaint " Jose Garcia Sep 2022 #99
I have no idea if this will succeed or not, but ... Novara Sep 2022 #102
So you don't want Biden appointees ruling on cases involving Student Loans? AZSkiffyGeek Sep 2022 #116
No, it's not how it works. Trump is a criminal suspect. Novara Sep 2022 #117
Kick and rec for triggered Trump fans. Kingofalldems Sep 2022 #107
What complaint? orthoclad Sep 2022 #109
K n R n Bookmark Justice matters. Sep 2022 #111
saw this tweet YoshidaYui Sep 2022 #118
All this is going to take zentrum Sep 2022 #119
Meanwhile - Merrick Garland and Justice are rolling eyes and saying ... stopdiggin Sep 2022 #122
For this threaf LetMyPeopleVote Sep 2022 #125
Call To Action filed an official complaint against Judge Cannon with the 11th Circuit LetMyPeopleVote Sep 2022 #126

AZSkiffyGeek

(11,008 posts)
9. That's what I'm wondering
Tue Sep 6, 2022, 05:10 PM
Sep 2022

Who is this Twitter account to have standing, and what exactly will be accomplished? And what is the Judiciary Council? This sounds questionable.

DetroitLegalBeagle

(1,922 posts)
12. They file a complaint with the clerk of the Court of Appeals
Tue Sep 6, 2022, 05:17 PM
Sep 2022

Of the district the judge is in. Then hope and pray that their complaint is one of the few that actually get acted upon. Only about 1-2% of federal judicial complaints actually see any formal investigation.

ancianita

(36,024 posts)
47. I believe this is a writ of mandamus.
Tue Sep 6, 2022, 07:07 PM
Sep 2022

I could be wrong, but this looks a lot like what a complaint re a ruling is.

https://www.justice.gov/jm/civil-resource-manual-215-mandamus


Mandamus at the Federal Level

In the federal courts, these orders most frequently appear when a party to a suit wants to appeal a judge's decision but is blocked by rules against interlocutory appeals. Instead of appealing directly, the party simply sues the judge, seeking a mandamus compelling the judge to correct his earlier mistake. Generally, this type of indirect appeal is only available if the party has no alternative means of seeking review.

The All Writs Act gave the "Supreme Court and all courts established by Act of Congress" the authority to issue writs of mandamus "in aid of their respective jurisdictions and agreeable to the usages and principles of law."

Further, 28 U.S. Code § 1361 gave federal district courts "original jurisdiction of any action in the nature of mandamus to compel an officer or employee of the United States or any agency thereof to perform a duty owed to the plaintiff."

https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/mandamus

Which, if the 11th decides in favor of the plaintiff, the DOJ, it could refer the whole case to the DC Circuit or tell Cannon to review and follow the law. Which will undoubtedly force her to rescind her ruling on the 'special master.' And so the DOJ can proceed in its investigation, since Trump and lawyers will have exhausted all their delay plays.

onenote

(42,699 posts)
56. Is there a link to what they actually filed?
Tue Sep 6, 2022, 07:17 PM
Sep 2022

From their description it doesn't sound like a petition for a writ of mandamus to me, but I haven't seen what they actually filed.

ancianita

(36,024 posts)
62. Looks like the justice.gov site doesn't have any news beyond Sept 2, and
Tue Sep 6, 2022, 07:35 PM
Sep 2022

Google Images doesn't show anything filed by the DOJ today. Sorry.

I'm sure we can expect to see a copy of the complaint soon, though.

Actually, though it doesn't, the tweet should have a copy available. It's weird that it doesn't.

onenote

(42,699 posts)
65. This isn't a complaint filed by DOJ. It's some silly group with no standing
Tue Sep 6, 2022, 07:52 PM
Sep 2022

filing a "complaint" against the judge.

Not worth the paper its written on, if it was actually written and filed.

TigressDem

(5,125 posts)
79. Complaint is better than an appeal, because it puts the judge's bad behavior on record.
Tue Sep 6, 2022, 11:39 PM
Sep 2022

THEN when an appeal is filed by the DOJ, these same issues can be pointed out in fairness, that it isn't just the DOJ who KNOWS this ruling breaks the law, but even the PEOPLE can obviously see the law isn't being followed and special treatment afforded during an ongoing investigation.

In fact with this in the works the DOJ could get even more aggressive and bring much more legal force to the issue.

Because these are "nobodies" who can see the truth plainly, the judge is REALLY out of bounds with it and the DOJ has not only a solid case, but public support.

Volaris

(10,270 posts)
64. Well that's a fun gambit ...
Tue Sep 6, 2022, 07:42 PM
Sep 2022

IMAGINE how much TrumpCo will scream like stuck hogs if this judges order gets reversed..

ancianita

(36,024 posts)
76. A writ of mandamus is anything but a gambit.
Tue Sep 6, 2022, 10:25 PM
Sep 2022

This writ is a serious filing re a seriously flawed ruling, and would probably make the judge use rule on law on executive privilege and give up her stated urge to preserve her notion of Trump's "reputational damage."

onenote

(42,699 posts)
81. You keep saying this is a writ of mandamus
Tue Sep 6, 2022, 11:44 PM
Sep 2022

But no one seems to have seen a copy and it was filed by a group with no standing. And it is unlikely that the government would file a motion for a writ of mandamus since it has the option of filing an appeal together with a request for stay of the district court order pending appeal.

ancianita

(36,024 posts)
101. Understood. I'm talking about the DOJ and you're explaining that it's CTA. I get that.
Wed Sep 7, 2022, 09:11 AM
Sep 2022

And the standing issue is solved with the DOJ raising the issue of Cannon's poorly constructed ruling to the Circuit.

jimfields33

(15,777 posts)
3. 2/3rd of the senate will be difficult to get
Tue Sep 6, 2022, 05:05 PM
Sep 2022

House can easily get the impeachment though with simple majority. At least it will be on her record.

calimary

(81,220 posts)
34. Reason enough to do it.
Tue Sep 6, 2022, 06:53 PM
Sep 2022

We DO NOT need a judge on the bench whose rulings are virtual valentines to the donald for appointing her to that bench.

We see through you, girlfriend, and we know where your loyalties lie, and who you clearly and obviously recognize as your benefactor.

yankee87

(2,170 posts)
7. Impeachment or possible criminal charges
Tue Sep 6, 2022, 05:07 PM
Sep 2022

This judge is hoping TFG gets back in and she’ll be on the Supreme Court. At best she should be impeached, at worse, maybe an indictment for collusion.

former9thward

(31,984 posts)
11. The complaint is not serious
Tue Sep 6, 2022, 05:15 PM
Sep 2022

You may notice this is a click bait complaint.

"If you don't want to miss any news or developments as the the Judicial Council of the Eleventh Circuit responds to our misconduct complaint against Judge Cannon, give us a follow."

All they want is more followers on Twitter.

Ocelot II

(115,680 posts)
14. And, from the FAQ pages about filing a complaint about a federal judge:
Tue Sep 6, 2022, 05:20 PM
Sep 2022
You cannot use this process to obtain automatic disqualification of a judge presiding over a case. In addition, you cannot use this process to challenge the correctness of a judge’s decision in a case. A judicial decision that is unfavorable to you does not alone establish misconduct or a disability. Under the Act, a complaint challenging the correctness of a judge’s decision will be dismissed. If you wish to challenge such a decision, you must do so before that court or on appeal, and not by filing a judicial conduct or disability complaint.

https://www.uscourts.gov/judges-judgeships/judicial-conduct-disability/faqs-filing-judicial-conduct-or-disability-complaint

This won't go anywhere absent evidence of some kind of improper or ex parte influence.

onecaliberal

(32,826 posts)
26. The sheer fact that she took the case... Let's see how the case was randomly assigned.
Tue Sep 6, 2022, 06:21 PM
Sep 2022

I would bet my savings account someone in the tick's orbit made all of this happen. It's payback for her appointment.

SCantiGOP

(13,869 posts)
53. Thanks, Ocelot
Tue Sep 6, 2022, 07:12 PM
Sep 2022

I was almost certain this was the case, but scrolled down to see if someone had already looked it up.

The remedy for a bad decision is not going to be a disciplinary action (unless there is something sinister involved) but an appeal to the next higher court.

wnylib

(21,433 posts)
67. If some ambitious investigative journalist
Tue Sep 6, 2022, 08:08 PM
Sep 2022

wanted to know more about Cannon's appointment and how Trump's case came before her, it might be interesting. I am not saying that there is anything inappropriate to find, just that the possibility exists, considering how Trump operates.

SCantiGOP

(13,869 posts)
69. I would love it if it were true
Tue Sep 6, 2022, 08:50 PM
Sep 2022

How about a secret cellphone tape of the conversation where Trump promised the judge a Circuit Court appointment if she ruled as he wanted? That would be Christmas, our birthdays and winning the lottery all rolled up in one.

msfiddlestix

(7,278 posts)
15. exactly the confirmation I expected to find, intuiting it was click bait, then bam there it is.
Tue Sep 6, 2022, 05:31 PM
Sep 2022

wish there was a way to keep these from being posted.

it feels like it's kind of fraudy.. like the Nigerian letter in the old days.

 

BlackSkimmer

(51,308 posts)
25. Thank you.
Tue Sep 6, 2022, 06:06 PM
Sep 2022

This OP has been posting tweets from numerous randos on twitter. This is just the latest.

This account is not verified by twitter and has less than 1800 following. Not sure what the motivation is here.

Response to former9thward (Reply #11)

former9thward

(31,984 posts)
37. I have never heard of her previous to this motion.
Tue Sep 6, 2022, 06:57 PM
Sep 2022

Why would I have any thoughts about her? I have previously posted in other threads that I don't think her ruling will have any significant effect on whatever happens in this matter.

BradAllison

(1,879 posts)
39. Uh huh.
Tue Sep 6, 2022, 06:58 PM
Sep 2022

I mean, she's an example of the bought and paid for clowns we have many years of suffering through.


I wonder what Judge Scalia would think?

 

BlackSkimmer

(51,308 posts)
46. First of all, "you're " is a contraction of you and are.
Tue Sep 6, 2022, 07:06 PM
Sep 2022

So that makes no sense. I’m sure you meant “your” which is possessive, as in “my” opinion.

I have no opinions of the judge, except that I feel certain she’s a tfg tool.

That still doesn’t negate the fact you made an ad hominem attack on another poster.

Response to BlackSkimmer (Reply #46)

 

BlackSkimmer

(51,308 posts)
51. And another personal attack.
Tue Sep 6, 2022, 07:11 PM
Sep 2022

You are consistent, I give you that.

As another longtime DUer always says, profiles are interesting.

PortTack

(32,757 posts)
13. Barbara McQuade just said the DOJ could move the case to DC jurisdiction since the crime occurred
Tue Sep 6, 2022, 05:17 PM
Sep 2022

There and sidestep this whole mess.

Anyone with more knowledge?

SoCalDavidS

(9,998 posts)
21. Barbara McQuade Says A Lot Of Things That Are No Longer Based In Reality
Tue Sep 6, 2022, 05:58 PM
Sep 2022

Just like many people here on DU, she believes that there is still a Rule Of Law in America, and that nobody is Above it.

WRONG!!!

This is why America is well on it's way, or already at, the point of being a Failed Nation. Slowly, more people are starting to realize this. She will too, at some point.

onenote

(42,699 posts)
54. So why didn't the DOJ move for a change of venue?
Tue Sep 6, 2022, 07:16 PM
Sep 2022

Does McQuade think DOJ is incompetent or corrupt in not making that motion when it would have been timely. If a party fails to object to venue and seek a change before the case is heard, the issue is waived and can't be raised on reconsideration or appeal.


PortTack

(32,757 posts)
57. Was just asking, because I didn't know
Tue Sep 6, 2022, 07:21 PM
Sep 2022

DOJ was tripped up by the ridiculous request of a special master? Even with that, the entire legal world, and the DOJ was taken aback by the even more ridiculous ruling by a partisan judge

onenote

(42,699 posts)
58. You can't really think the DOJ attorneys weren't capable of making that motion
Tue Sep 6, 2022, 07:24 PM
Sep 2022

but were able to prepare a detailed written filing that made lots of other arguments and then present a strong oral argument in open court.

I've seen nothing that supports the argument that the Southern District of Florida was an improper venue for a case brought with respect to the fruits of a search warrant issued by that court and the resultant search conducted in the Southern District of Florida.

FBaggins

(26,729 posts)
113. I can't see how she would know that
Wed Sep 7, 2022, 12:40 PM
Sep 2022

Trump went to Mar-a-lago over 100 times while he was president and often worked from there. How do we know that the documents involved weren't already there at the end of 2020? If so, the crime occurred in FL, not DC.

Also - remember that it's the DOJ that started the ball rolling in the 11th circuit. It's a bit late for them to claim that they should be able to transfer to a friendlier court.

live love laugh

(13,100 posts)
84. They're based in Bethesda so you're probably right.
Wed Sep 7, 2022, 01:34 AM
Sep 2022

No standing — but a case could be made that as a national case all citizens everywhere have standing regarding potential threats resulting from disclosure.

SunSeeker

(51,550 posts)
92. It is not a lawsuit. Anyone can submit a complaint about a judge.
Wed Sep 7, 2022, 07:29 AM
Sep 2022

It's like submitting a complaint to the state bar about a crooked attorney.

SunSeeker

(51,550 posts)
93. Look them up on Facebook.
Wed Sep 7, 2022, 07:38 AM
Sep 2022

They're verified by Facebook and based in Maryland.


https://www.facebook.com/calltoactivism/


People tend not to give out their personal names on the internet for fear of being doxxed or attacked by MAGAts.

Almost everyone here posts anonymously, including you.

Takket

(21,562 posts)
73. they are a political advocasy group, not a legal organization
Tue Sep 6, 2022, 09:15 PM
Sep 2022

this so called complaint is clickbait nonsense and will go nowhere.

SunSeeker

(51,550 posts)
88. It's not that kind of complaint. It is not a lawsuit. It is a misconduct complaint.
Wed Sep 7, 2022, 06:56 AM
Sep 2022

It is like how you would file a complaint about a crooked lawyer with the state bar.

Roland99

(53,342 posts)
105. Call to Activism has been pushed popular tweeter JoJoFromJerz (and lately Brian Karem, too)
Wed Sep 7, 2022, 09:42 AM
Sep 2022

Looking up Call to Activism there is really no transparency as to they're funding or purpose.

They seem to have a pattern of tweeting and asking a template type question as a followup and then a request for people to follow

otchmoson

(68 posts)
19. Has anyone checked on Cannon's citizenship?
Tue Sep 6, 2022, 05:56 PM
Sep 2022

Does anyone know how to locate information regarding Cannon's citizenship. Her mother was Cuban; she was born in Colombia. Was her father an American citizen? Did she apply for naturalization? Just curious.

AZSkiffyGeek

(11,008 posts)
44. Why are you curious?
Tue Sep 6, 2022, 07:05 PM
Sep 2022

Do you think an undocumented immigrant is a judge? Or just looking to spread rumors? Don’t bother answering.

otchmoson

(68 posts)
63. After all the grief Obama went through with the birthers
Tue Sep 6, 2022, 07:41 PM
Sep 2022

I find it interesting how little we know about the judge. I don't have research tools. I could find that she was born in Colombia; that she received her J.D. from Michigan; that she was a member of the Federalist Society and the Delta Delta Delta sorority. I could find where she was employed, and the questionnaire she had to complete before her appointment to the bench. But here parentage, her relocation to the U.S., and her citizenship status were not available through the Google machine.

FBaggins

(26,729 posts)
90. You don't think the Senate confirmation process would have checked?
Wed Sep 7, 2022, 07:08 AM
Sep 2022

Surprising to some... there is no citizenship requirement in the constitution.

But more than 21 Democrats would have voted against her if there were any reason to doubt it. Just think of the political power of (just before the 2020 election) we could point at an "illegal" getting past Trump.

stopdiggin

(11,296 posts)
120. this one needs to go back in the box
Wed Sep 7, 2022, 06:50 PM
Sep 2022

there's speculation - and then there's inappropriate speculation.

Zeitghost

(3,858 posts)
124. The grief Obama went through
Thu Sep 8, 2022, 12:12 PM
Sep 2022

was based on racism and bigotry. Why would you choose to engage in similar behavior?

Ocelot II

(115,680 posts)
20. This won't go anywhere.
Tue Sep 6, 2022, 05:57 PM
Sep 2022

"You cannot use this process to obtain automatic disqualification of a judge presiding over a case. In addition, you cannot use this process to challenge the correctness of a judge’s decision in a case. A judicial decision that is unfavorable to you does not alone establish misconduct or a disability. Under the Act, a complaint challenging the correctness of a judge’s decision will be dismissed. If you wish to challenge such a decision, you must do so before that court or on appeal, and not by filing a judicial conduct or disability complaint." https://www.uscourts.gov/judges-judgeships/judicial-conduct-disability/faqs-filing-judicial-conduct-or-disability-complaint

Maraya1969

(22,478 posts)
114. I believe there is a lot more to this than just a simple challenge of the "correctness" of a
Wed Sep 7, 2022, 12:43 PM
Sep 2022

decision. She is obviously pandering to tfg. She made a case about it hurting his reputation as if that means something. She is obviously singling him out for special treatment just because he was once president of the US and may run again. And the horrible thing about that is HE is demanding special treatment also.

 

BlackSkimmer

(51,308 posts)
23. You keep posting this. Who are these people?
Tue Sep 6, 2022, 06:04 PM
Sep 2022

They're not even verified by twitter.

They have what, 1700 followers?

I'm no twitter person, but even I know that's small potatoes.

SunSeeker

(51,550 posts)
91. They are a progressive social media activist group. They've been on Twitter since 2017.
Wed Sep 7, 2022, 07:11 AM
Sep 2022

They have over 830,000 Facebook followers and are verified on Facebook:



From their Facebook page:

WHO WE ARE

CALL TO ACTIVISM is among the “Top 25 most-engaged American Political Facebook Pages” according to the Pew Research Center.

With Facebook memes that reach up to 50 million Americans a month, CALL TO ACTIVISM informs and impacts change. We are a group of concerned citizens and social media practitioners that strive to counter Right-Wing lies with indisputable facts and decency.

OUR WORK

Our primary vehicle for change is Digital Activism through our powerful and informative memes.

We deliver hard-hitting news and action-based infographic headlines to millions of followers each day.

WHAT YOU CAN DO RIGHT NOW

We plan on doing everything we can to help the Biden Administration
effect positive change. Visit CALL TO ACTIVISM on Facebook every day and continue to LIKE and SHARE our daily headlines.
https://www.facebook.com/calltoactivism/

They also have a website:
https://www.calltoactivism.com/

quaint

(2,561 posts)
30. I don't think their activism is based in altruism.
Tue Sep 6, 2022, 06:45 PM
Sep 2022
CALL TO ACTIVISM

6900 WISCONSIN AVE, SUITE 200

Bethesda, Maryland

United States of America

Roland99

(53,342 posts)
106. yeah...see my post #105
Wed Sep 7, 2022, 09:45 AM
Sep 2022

I've been watching them the last several months and their m.o. is very predictable.

vlyons

(10,252 posts)
61. Thank-you thank-you thank-you
Tue Sep 6, 2022, 07:33 PM
Sep 2022

Thank you Call to Activism!!!

She has proven herself to be a partisan non-objective unqualified judge.

Ocelot II

(115,680 posts)
77. You can, but -
Tue Sep 6, 2022, 10:40 PM
Sep 2022

"You cannot use this process to obtain automatic disqualification of a judge presiding over a case. In addition, you cannot use this process to challenge the correctness of a judge’s decision in a case. A judicial decision that is unfavorable to you does not alone establish misconduct or a disability. Under the Act, a complaint challenging the correctness of a judge’s decision will be dismissed. If you wish to challenge such a decision, you must do so before that court or on appeal, and not by filing a judicial conduct or disability complaint." https://www.uscourts.gov/judges-judgeships/judicial-conduct-disability/faqs-filing-judicial-conduct-or-disability-complaint

SunSeeker

(51,550 posts)
86. Her opinion showed a bias in favor of Trump. That is grounds for a complaint.
Wed Sep 7, 2022, 06:46 AM
Sep 2022
...“Misconduct” is “conduct prejudicial to the effective and expeditious administration of the business of the courts.” A “disability” is a temporary or permanent condition, either mental or physical, that makes the judge “unable to discharge all the duties” of the judicial office.

Examples of judicial misconduct may include the following:

using the judge’s office to obtain special treatment for friends or relatives;
•accepting bribes, gifts, or other personal favors related to the judicial office;
•engaging in improper ex parte communications with parties or counsel for one side in a case;
engaging in partisan political activity or making inappropriately partisan statements;
•soliciting funds for organizations;violating rules or standards pertaining to restrictions on outside income or knowlingly violating requirements for financial disclosure;
•engaging in unwanted, offensive, or abusive sexual conduct, including sexual harassment or assault;
•treating litigants, attorneys, judicial employees, or others in a demonstrably egregious and hostile manner;
•creating a hostile work environment for judicial employees;
•intentional discrimination on the basis of race, color, sex, gender, gender entity, pregnancy, sexual orientation, religion, national origin, age, or disability;
•retaliating against complainants, witnesses, judicial employees, or others for participating in the judicial conduct and disability complaint process, or for reporting or disclosing judicial misconduct or disability;
•refusing, without good cause shown, to cooperate in the investigation of a judicial conduct or disability complaint or enforcement of a decision under the Rules; and
•failing to call to the attention of the relevant district chief judge or circuit chief judge any reliable information reasonably likely to constitute judicial misconduct or disability.

This list does not include all the possible grounds for a complaint.

You may complain about actions taken by a judge outside their official role as a judge if “the conduct is reasonably likely to have a prejudicial effect on the administration of the business of the courts, including a substantial and widespread lowering of public confidence in the courts among reasonable people.”
https://www.uscourts.gov/judges-judgeships/judicial-conduct-disability/faqs-filing-judicial-conduct-or-disability-complaint#faq-What-can-I-complain-about?

Her opinion showed truly egregious bias in favor of Trump, like her basing her decision on her concern for Trump’s "reputational harm" over a lawfully conducted search, something no unbiased judge expresses for any defendent.

More people should be filing complaints against the miscreants Trump put on the bench. So what if it doesn't result in any consequences for the Judge? What's wrong with at least trying, and getting the complaint on record?

SlimJimmy

(3,180 posts)
98. I'm not being hostile. But until it's the DoJ making the complaint or appeal
Wed Sep 7, 2022, 07:59 AM
Sep 2022

It's just noise, and clickbait. But you already knew that.

SunSeeker

(51,550 posts)
100. Everyone has a right to file a complaint about bad judge.
Wed Sep 7, 2022, 08:59 AM
Sep 2022

If you are not interested in what this activist group filed, then keep scrolling. It serves no constructive purpose to bash them in this thread. They are just trying to get an anti-Trump & Pro-Biden message out. Why do Republicans' work for them by calling it "just noise, and cluckbait"? That is needlessly hostile to a group that is on our side.

SunSeeker

(51,550 posts)
104. What's wrong with pro-Democratic groups trying to get views?
Wed Sep 7, 2022, 09:38 AM
Sep 2022

We need more progressive folks like this on social media. Social media is saturated by right wing trolls.

stopdiggin

(11,296 posts)
121. might be because - repeating for clarity, "Wasting our time"
Wed Sep 7, 2022, 07:00 PM
Sep 2022

this is not legal remedy (and it's questionable even as activism), it's just attention seeking.

SunSeeker

(51,550 posts)
123. If it's such a waste of time, why are you posting in this thread?
Thu Sep 8, 2022, 11:08 AM
Sep 2022

I disagree that it is "questionable activism." "Attention seeking" is one of the key things activists do. It's what helps change things, and moves public opinion. As Speaker Pelosi famously said, "Public sentiment is everything."

If you don't want to help them, then at least don't bash them, especially on a Democratic discussion board.

Brainfodder

(6,423 posts)
85. Meanwhile, I read her being considered for next Republican pick SC opening?
Wed Sep 7, 2022, 01:38 AM
Sep 2022


I can't wait til the SC loopholes for removal are "found"?


Novara

(5,841 posts)
102. I have no idea if this will succeed or not, but ...
Wed Sep 7, 2022, 09:22 AM
Sep 2022

... no judge appointed by a person should EVER rule on any cases involving that person, full stop.

We have got to have better judicial ethics. She should have been forced to recuse.

AZSkiffyGeek

(11,008 posts)
116. So you don't want Biden appointees ruling on cases involving Student Loans?
Wed Sep 7, 2022, 01:34 PM
Sep 2022

Or his other executive orders?
Is that how this works?

Novara

(5,841 posts)
117. No, it's not how it works. Trump is a criminal suspect.
Wed Sep 7, 2022, 02:59 PM
Sep 2022

Forgiving student loans is not a criminal act.

zentrum

(9,865 posts)
119. All this is going to take
Wed Sep 7, 2022, 04:58 PM
Sep 2022

......forever, preventing indictments of Rump in time to effect the 2024 elections.

stopdiggin

(11,296 posts)
122. Meanwhile - Merrick Garland and Justice are rolling eyes and saying ...
Wed Sep 7, 2022, 07:07 PM
Sep 2022

"Ah .... Thanks, guys? Think maybe we got this .. ?"
------ ------

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Complaint filed with 11th...