General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsPolitico: Same-sex marriage bill teeters on verge of GOP filibuster
While proponents publicly say theyre optimistic the bill will get the 10 GOP votes it needs during a floor vote expected the week of Sept. 19, senators and aides close to the effort say many Republicans may wait until the last minute to decide. Sens. Tammy Baldwin (D-Wis.) and Susan Collins (R-Maine) are drafting an amendment aimed at satisfying conservative concerns that the bill backed in its current form by two members of House GOP leadership risks infringing on religious freedom.
Baldwin and Collins amendment seeks to clarify that the bill leaves intact the protections of a 1993 religious freedom law initially sponsored by now-Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, according to an aide familiar with the discussion. As Baldwin put it Thursday, the amendment simply confirms the status quo remains.
That may not be enough for most Senate Republicans, who are expected to have a competing amendment on religious exemptions to same-sex marriage protections courtesy of Sen. Mike Lee (R-Utah). Only three GOP senators are firmly backing the bill and its far from clear, despite expectations of success, that a total of 10 will emerge.
https://www.politico.com/news/2022/09/09/same-sex-marriage-bill-gop-filibuster-00055769
Walleye
(31,008 posts)50 Shades Of Blue
(9,975 posts)EnergizedLib
(1,893 posts)No church or official is forced to perform a same-sex wedding, as far as I know.
So, I dont see how this encroaches religious freedom, and by religion, they have only one in mind.
No one is forcing anyone to officiate a same-sex wedding or approve of same-sex marriage.
Meadowoak
(5,545 posts)brooklynite
(94,502 posts)DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)That's on them.
dsc
(52,155 posts)A religious exemption that is overly broad would decimate the right to marriage in every state in the union. All such marriages would be one bigot away from being unrecognized. Conversely if the SCOTUS reverses Obergefell then those of us who live in GOP controlled states will lose the right to marry completely.
Buckeyeblue
(5,499 posts)Straight or gay. There is no obligation. I don't know why we need a special law saying so. The Catholic church has refused to marry certain individuals for years.
Religious freedom means people can believe what they want and go to the church that they want. Period. It doesn't mean they get to live by a different set of laws.