General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsNot sure the American Revolution would have survived
the fawning of media hacks like Andrea Mitchell. If the USA could be independent, why not Scotland?
And yes my ancestors were given the name of a Scottish scoundrel. 😀😀😭😭😭
Doc Sportello
(7,508 posts)I got to tour Holyrood House (official royal residence) in Edinburgh while the royal asses weren't in their chairs and got to talking to a Scottish docent/guard. He was all for Scottish independence and for the abolishment of the monarchy. As a descendant of the MacGregor clan, I enjoyed that.
malaise
(268,913 posts)Thanks for that 😀
JoeOtterbein
(7,700 posts)Common sense!
brush
(53,764 posts)malaise
(268,913 posts)brush
(53,764 posts)of being independent?
malaise
(268,913 posts)No one would ever call me for details on Scottish history😀😀
Angleae
(4,482 posts)Her heir, since she had no children, was James VI of Scotland. But that was only a partial thing (there was actually a war between the countries after that). A century later the parliaments of both countries agreed to merge.
https://pintsofhistory.com/2014/09/18/how-scotland-and-england-merged-in-the-first-place/
brush
(53,764 posts)Sympthsical
(9,071 posts)Because Elizabeth I didn't have a direct heir in 1603. They were still separate countries, but that got the ball rolling. The monarchies were now united. Over the next century, Scotland found itself deep in debt and began to feel it would be economically beneficial to merge with England. Couple in some Catholics with various claims to the Scottish throne were floating around and the Scots were super Calvinistic Protestant types, and there was a lot going for the idea at the time.
The English were just plain tired of the Auld Alliance (where Scotland had a penchant for siding with France every time there were fisticuffs).
So in 1707 both parliaments passed the Act of Union. It wasn't a military conquest or anything like that.
However, these are the broad broad strokes. There's more to it that makes for interesting reading.
brush
(53,764 posts)Gore1FL
(21,127 posts)Both countries were ruled by the same monarch through marriages. At the time of Queen Victoria, they decided to unite as one nation under her rule. I believe this was intended to be temporary at the time.
Take this with a grain of salt. It's been a long time and I might be confusing this with another long-ago history lesson.
JanMichael
(24,881 posts)I also have Scottish ancestry on one side.