Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

The Straight Story

(48,121 posts)
Sun Jan 15, 2012, 12:56 PM Jan 2012

Want to See Every Tree in America?

Want to See Every Tree in America?

We may sing about purple mountains and amber grains, but one of America's most vital resources is its vast amount of carbon-catching, oxygen-spewing trees. Now, after six years of effort, NASA knows how many we've got.

Josef Kellndorfer and Wayne Walker of NASA's Woods Hole Research Center worked in conjunction with the National Geological Survey and US Forest Service to catalog a mix of data gleaned from space-based radar, satellite sensors, computer models, and old-fashioned tree counting. The map above shows the total amount of woody biomass in the USA. It's displayed at a 30 meter resolution, where every four pixels constitutes an acre and every ten represents a hectare. In total, Kellendorfer estimates some five million trees reside on US soil. [NASA Earth Observatory via Business Insider via Geekosystem]


http://gizmodo.com/5876091/want-to-see-every-tree-in-america



Trees are one of Earth’s largest banks for storing the carbon that gets emitted by natural processes and human activities. Forests cover about 30 percent of the planet’s surface, and as much as 45 percent of the carbon stored on land is tied up in forests.

But did global forests hold more or less carbon in the past? And could they store more in the future? Does it matter where those trees are growing? Scientists really don’t know. But before they can find out, they’ll need a reliable inventory of what is growing today.

Josef Kellndorfer and Wayne Walker of the Woods Hole Research Center (WHRC) recently worked with colleagues at the U.S. Forest Service and U.S. Geological Survey to create such an inventory for the United States. The map above was built from the National Biomass and Carbon Dataset (NBCD), released in 2011. It depicts the concentration of biomass—a measure of the amount of organic carbon—stored in the trunks, limbs, and leaves of trees. The darkest greens reveal the areas with the densest, tallest, and most robust forest growth.

Over six years, researchers assembled the national forest map from space-based radar, satellite sensors, computer models, and a massive amount of ground-based data. It is possibly the highest resolution and most detailed view of forest structure and carbon storage ever assembled for any country.

http://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/IOTD/view.php?id=76697

27 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Want to See Every Tree in America? (Original Post) The Straight Story Jan 2012 OP
That is very cool! peacebird Jan 2012 #1
Interesting. I just checked on the urban forest MineralMan Jan 2012 #2
Wow. Neoma Jan 2012 #3
Plenty of places to hide a bigfoot in The Straight Story Jan 2012 #4
You laugh but... Neoma Jan 2012 #5
I'm in Tennessee. What part was this "sightin'" in? Fawke Em Jan 2012 #18
Camden. Neoma Jan 2012 #21
I know where Camden is. Fawke Em Jan 2012 #24
Yeah. Neoma Jan 2012 #26
Looks like bigfoot might DocMac Jan 2012 #13
The Squatches live along the Appalachian trail, according to Fawke Em Jan 2012 #20
He was looking for Squatches, in Argentina. nt DocMac Jan 2012 #23
Then they should've captured them on camera by now. Neoma Jan 2012 #27
Not enough or not enough? socialindependocrat Jan 2012 #8
Not to mention car pollution. Neoma Jan 2012 #14
hoping this is a misquote from the story... ProdigalJunkMail Jan 2012 #6
Yeah, just a tad off :) 1.7 billion planted in US in 1999 alone (nt) The Straight Story Jan 2012 #7
At least he was in the ballpark!!! n/t socialindependocrat Jan 2012 #12
I hope he meant five BILLION trees Itchinjim Jan 2012 #9
I think so too i_sometimes Jan 2012 #10
Although looking closer: "includes measurements of " not how many trees The Straight Story Jan 2012 #11
then it looks like Gizmodo's summary ProdigalJunkMail Jan 2012 #15
Good catch though, hopefully they will update article with an accurate number! (nt) The Straight Story Jan 2012 #16
I think he's full of shit. Dreamer Tatum Jan 2012 #17
when you get your own satellite data you can prove him wrong... ProdigalJunkMail Jan 2012 #19
What's up with there being no trees in the northern Sacramento Valley on this map? Saving Hawaii Jan 2012 #22
That's my Minnesota! FredStembottom Jan 2012 #25

MineralMan

(146,254 posts)
2. Interesting. I just checked on the urban forest
Sun Jan 15, 2012, 01:07 PM
Jan 2012

here in St. Paul, MN. 32%+ of the area in the city is covered by tree canopies. Minneapolis has a similar coverage. There's a great page on the St. Paul urban forest here:

http://www.stpaul.gov/index.aspx?NID=4581

Neoma

(10,039 posts)
5. You laugh but...
Sun Jan 15, 2012, 01:14 PM
Jan 2012

I know a part in Tennessee where there be a bigfoot sightin'!

Unfortunately I'm perfectly serious...

Fawke Em

(11,366 posts)
18. I'm in Tennessee. What part was this "sightin'" in?
Sun Jan 15, 2012, 01:23 PM
Jan 2012

Nothing I'd like more than to see a Squatch!

Neoma

(10,039 posts)
21. Camden.
Sun Jan 15, 2012, 01:51 PM
Jan 2012

They're out in the sticks, rather isolated. Very high cancer rate for some reason. Bible belt kind of place.

Fawke Em

(11,366 posts)
20. The Squatches live along the Appalachian trail, according to
Sun Jan 15, 2012, 01:24 PM
Jan 2012

the Finding Bigfoot researchers.

I wonder if they met Gov. Sanford?

Neoma

(10,039 posts)
27. Then they should've captured them on camera by now.
Sun Jan 15, 2012, 03:01 PM
Jan 2012

They found out about wild horses living there. Why not bigfoot?

socialindependocrat

(1,372 posts)
8. Not enough or not enough?
Sun Jan 15, 2012, 01:16 PM
Jan 2012

I was thinking that if we have 300 million people in the U.S.
then 5 million trees seems like a very low count.

Whatever....

ProdigalJunkMail

(12,017 posts)
6. hoping this is a misquote from the story...
Sun Jan 15, 2012, 01:14 PM
Jan 2012

"In total, Kellendorfer estimates some five million trees reside on US soil."

um, little short on his estimate...

sP

The Straight Story

(48,121 posts)
11. Although looking closer: "includes measurements of " not how many trees
Sun Jan 15, 2012, 01:18 PM
Jan 2012

Forests in the U.S. were mapped down to a scale of 30 meters, or roughly 10 computer display pixels for every hectare of land (4 pixels per acre). They divided the country into 66 mapping zones and ended up mapping 265 million segments of the American land surface. Kellndorfer estimates that their mapping database includes measurements of about five million trees.

-But perhaps how many they have direct data on.

ProdigalJunkMail

(12,017 posts)
15. then it looks like Gizmodo's summary
Sun Jan 15, 2012, 01:20 PM
Jan 2012

is to blame. no biggie...just really jumped out at me. some of my family are in forestry and they would laugh at that number..

still...very cool project...

sP

Saving Hawaii

(441 posts)
22. What's up with there being no trees in the northern Sacramento Valley on this map?
Sun Jan 15, 2012, 01:52 PM
Jan 2012

Almond trees, walnut trees, pistachio trees, olive trees, orange trees. The orchards go on and on and on.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Want to See Every Tree in...