Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsSidney Powell Warns Of 'Flock Of Cats' In Sanctions Appeal. Also Mob Violence. Very on-brand.
https://abovethelaw.com/2022/09/sidney-powell-warns-of-flock-of-cats-in-sanctions-appeal-also-mob-violence/Sidney Powell Warns Of 'Flock Of Cats' In Sanctions Appeal. Also Mob Violence
Very on-brand.
By LIZ DYE
onSeptember 13, 2022 at 5:47 PM
The Kraken is back, baby, and it is quacking?
This barnyard analogy appears in an appeal to the Sixth Circuit of the sanctions imposed last year on attorney Sidney Powell and her merry band of Kraken lawyers in the Michigan tentacle of their election LOLsuits. In August of 2021, US District Judge Linda V. Parker ordered them to go to continuing legal education and pay attorneys fees to various Michigan government entities. Among other barnyard epithets, their sins included attaching facially nonsensical affidavits cribbed from other election suits without vetting them at all. The above analogy was by way of arguing that some of the affidavits were true, and so the court was wrong to sanction them for the few lying cats in the bunch.
Which is hilarious, and extremely on-brand for Sidney Powell and Howard Kleinhendler, the two Krakenhead lawyers who put their names on this brief. Less hilarious is their invocation of Martin Luther Kings 1966 speech describing riots as the language of the unheard, both because of the breathtaking audacity of the comparison and because of the implied threat of violence less than two years after people who believed their lies about a stolen election stormed the Capitol seeking to overthrow the government.
[...]
Very on-brand.
By LIZ DYE
onSeptember 13, 2022 at 5:47 PM
The Kraken is back, baby, and it is quacking?
If you see a flock of feathered animals quacking as they waddle towards a lake, you can reasonably infer that they are ducks, even if not all are clearly discernible. Sure, there might be a goose or a chicken in there somewhere, but it is certainly rational and proper to suggest that, after closer examination and further inquiry, those might be ducks after all. What is not rational and proper is to focus on the one or two animals that are not clearly identifiable, ignore the rest, and conclude its a flock of catsand no one could possibly think otherwise.
This barnyard analogy appears in an appeal to the Sixth Circuit of the sanctions imposed last year on attorney Sidney Powell and her merry band of Kraken lawyers in the Michigan tentacle of their election LOLsuits. In August of 2021, US District Judge Linda V. Parker ordered them to go to continuing legal education and pay attorneys fees to various Michigan government entities. Among other barnyard epithets, their sins included attaching facially nonsensical affidavits cribbed from other election suits without vetting them at all. The above analogy was by way of arguing that some of the affidavits were true, and so the court was wrong to sanction them for the few lying cats in the bunch.
Which is hilarious, and extremely on-brand for Sidney Powell and Howard Kleinhendler, the two Krakenhead lawyers who put their names on this brief. Less hilarious is their invocation of Martin Luther Kings 1966 speech describing riots as the language of the unheard, both because of the breathtaking audacity of the comparison and because of the implied threat of violence less than two years after people who believed their lies about a stolen election stormed the Capitol seeking to overthrow the government.
[...]
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
11 replies, 1008 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (11)
ReplyReply to this post
11 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Sidney Powell Warns Of 'Flock Of Cats' In Sanctions Appeal. Also Mob Violence. Very on-brand. (Original Post)
sl8
Sep 2022
OP
Nice projection, that is exactly what the magats do. Focus on conjecture and outright bullshit...
Thomas Hurt
Sep 2022
#4
I am sick and damn tired of being threatened, daily with Fascist mob violence.
Chainfire
Sep 2022
#8
Sky Jewels
(7,066 posts)1. Flock of Cats was one of my favorite bands in the 80s.
Geechie
(864 posts)9. Hairballs...
Sanity Claws
(21,846 posts)2. Flock of cats? Kraken is so apt
GoCubsGo
(32,079 posts)3. Another one who belongs in a psychiatric ward.
She should be in the room next to Mike Lindell's.
Thomas Hurt
(13,903 posts)4. Nice projection, that is exactly what the magats do. Focus on conjecture and outright bullshit...
and conclude that the election was rigged by massive fraud.
The Big Lie is a flock of cats.
hatrack
(59,583 posts)5. I believe the proper term is a "clowder of cats" . . .
But was I expecting Sidney Powell (as a lawyer) to be familiar with dusty corners of the English language? Not really.
Initech
(100,062 posts)6. Mob violence? Like a right wing mob threatening to murder 1/2 of Congress?
hlthe2b
(102,218 posts)7. Renamed after the tragic seagull massacre in the late 80s
So apt she is.
Chainfire
(17,527 posts)8. I am sick and damn tired of being threatened, daily with Fascist mob violence.
Let the mobs crawl out from under their rocks where they can be dealt with appropriately. Will it come with a cost? No doubt, but is is a cost we must bear. A free nation can not make decisions based upon threats or fears.
When we finally deal with them (and it is a when, not an if) then the people who egged them on should have to suffer the same fates as the ones who actually carried the guns and threw the bombs.
onenote
(42,690 posts)10. Yep. That's the kind of argument that will persuade a court. Not.
C_U_L8R
(44,997 posts)11. This is your brain on Trump
QQQuackers.