General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsI think the Dems are making a mistake on delaying a vote on marriage equality
Link to tweet
Frank Thorp V
·
Sep 15, 2022
@frankthorp
·
Follow
NEWS: The lead negotiators trying to find a compromise bill to codify same sex marriage protections say they will delay a vote on the bill until after the November midterm elections to give themselves more time and give the bill a higher likelihood of passing.
Frank Thorp V
@frankthorp
·
Follow
Sen @ewarren is not happy: We need to vote on equal marriage today if there are Republicans who don't want to vote on that before the election, I assume it is because they are on the wrong side of history.
11:09 AM · Sep 15, 2022
If we lose the midterms this will not pass before the new Congress is seated. Make the Republicans vote NOW and use their extremist views to help us in the midterms.
4Q2u2
(1,406 posts)Force them into the light and let them burn like the Vampires they are.
Senate President should be getting AD material everyday. Full on assault of the Republicans.
lapucelle
(18,252 posts)Hortensis
(58,785 posts)She's a strong, active supporter of marriage equality. She knows where the problem lies.
Nevilledog
(51,081 posts)Link to tweet
Manu Raju
@mkraju
·
Follow
News -- Sen. Tammy Baldwin, a leading Democratic negotiator on the marriage equality legislation, told us that they need more time to negotiate the issue with Republicans -- and wants to delay any vote until after the November midterms.
10:37 AM · Sep 15, 2022
emulatorloo
(44,118 posts)vote for it.
Nevilledog
(51,081 posts)Also read that Sinema was involved in getting the delay.
emulatorloo
(44,118 posts)du thread here
https://www.democraticunderground.com/10142969946
_
Tammy Baldwin signals new concerns about getting 60 votes for same-sex marriage bill
By Ted Barrett, CNN
Published 3:17 PM EDT, Wed September 14, 2022
CNN Sen. Tammy Baldwin, the lead Democratic sponsor of a bill that would codify same-sex marriage that faces a key procedural vote as soon as next week, said Wednesday shes concerned midterm politics are complicating her ability to reach a deal on the legislation. I think that we were ready to push for a vote for this right after the House voted overwhelmingly, in a bipartisan manner, to advance this, Baldwin said, referencing how the House passed the bill in July 267 to 157.
In the Senate, however, the bills supporters need at least 10 Republicans on board in order to overcome a GOP filibuster. But now were getting ever closer to a certain date in November and I think thats a new factor, she added.
Baldwin explained that while she believes there could be 10 Republicans who support the final bill, she is less certain she could get 10 to break the filibuster, as procedural votes like that often fall on party lines, especially without a final deal on language.
I think the problem we have right now is that I think there are 10 on final passage, but we need cooperation on procedural votes before we get there, said Baldwin, who is the first known gay politician elected to the US Senate.
(snip)
https://www.cnn.com/2022/09/14/politics/tammy-baldwin-same-sex-marriage/index.html
Nevilledog
(51,081 posts)Sometimes you gotta lose to win.
They're kidding themselves if they think the GOP will vote for this after midterms.
crickets
(25,963 posts)Runningdawg
(4,516 posts)First equality, then overturning Loving. Evangelicals have been planning this since before I was born. One of my first conversations on race with my parents at about 5 years of age, was why I couldn't play with a certain kid on the playground. My moms answer-his parents want to kill us and one day you will need to kill them. At age FIVE!!!
I brought the subject up again as a Sr in HS at the Sunday dinner table after a sermon that made me physically ill. I pointed out mom was full Irish and dad full Cherokee. Hardest single punch I've ever taken.
Hortensis
(58,785 posts)that replaced the Roe and Casey decisions. They're anti-abortion, not anti- Roe.
Remember, just for one excuse they might use, that there is NO explicit "right to privacy" stated in the Constitution. One was inferred to have been meant by a liberal court, but it can be taken away by these people -- and their aggression strongly suggests they will.
emulatorloo
(44,118 posts)Hortensis
(58,785 posts)claims from anti-Democratic Party LW groups is as necessary as those from RW counterparts.
If it makes Democrats sound incredibly (unbelievably?!) stupid and/or remiss for not taking some seemingly obvious action, like this, at very least theyre leaving out some important details. On purpose.
ColinC
(8,291 posts)Just bring up a straight vote with no funny business, and see who votes for it and who doesn't. Then reap the electoral benefits if it doesn't pass.
slightlv
(2,787 posts)The R's got hit hard by the abortion fiasco. They'll be hit hard if they vote against marriage equality - and you KNOW they will vote against it. That needs to be brought out before the midterms so that people have it placed in their faces before going to their polling places! Just like taking away women's rights. People will be just as horrified at taking away LGBTQ+ rights, as well. They have the right to know these hang in the balance before they cast their vote. I think waiting to vote on this until after the midterms is an awful idea!
msongs
(67,395 posts)EnergizedLib
(1,894 posts)As Dr. King said, the time is always right to do whats right.