Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

tavernier

(12,370 posts) Fri Sep 16, 2022, 06:49 PM Sep 2022

Legal Talking Heads stated last night that DOJ would appeal

this morning. I’ve been tuning in on and off to hear that news but so far nothing. Are they really going to go along with this handpicked Trumpy to rule on our nation’s most sensitive secrets?

3 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Legal Talking Heads stated last night that DOJ would appeal (Original Post) tavernier Sep 2022 OP

My guess they were not expecting it to be so bad. I think they are likely re-working their original Bev54 Sep 2022 #1

Thanks tavernier Sep 2022 #2

At this point I believe BlueIdaho Sep 2022 #3

Bev54

(10,039 posts)

1. My guess they were not expecting it to be so bad. I think they are likely re-working their original

Reply to tavernier (Original post)

Fri Sep 16, 2022, 07:48 PM

Sep 2022

appeal. I expect to see one filed. They have already filed the notice back right after her original ruling so it is coming.

tavernier

(12,370 posts)

2. Thanks

Reply to Bev54 (Reply #1)

Fri Sep 16, 2022, 08:19 PM

Sep 2022

Not being a lawyer, I guess I thought an appeal would be in place of accepting a special master, but it sounds like he has already set up a meeting time with them all.

BlueIdaho

(13,582 posts)

3. At this point I believe

Reply to tavernier (Original post)

Fri Sep 16, 2022, 08:36 PM

Sep 2022

They are working day and night to get this case moved out from under that quack Cannon. If it takes a few days to do that - I’m ok. America’s secrets belong in a federally secure location - not used as cocktail party favors by a madman.

Reply to this discussion