Do you think this violates the Establishment Clause?

[Nevilledog]

Link to tweet

Tweet text:

Daniel A. Horwitz
@danielahorwitz
·
Follow
The nation would lose 👏 its 👏 shit 👏 if this were a polytheistic prayer or a Muslim call to prayer. And I don’t care how it has been interpreted, this ought to violate the Establishment Clause.
Image

[DavidDvorkin]

1. It certainly does.

[Nevilledog]

2. I agree. They excuse it away because it's *voluntary*

[Hotler]

3. Used the Lord's own sharpie to sign it. nt

[SheltieLover]

4. Red hellhole TN, once again a national disgrace!

[GenThePerservering]

5. What a lot of hypocritical yap

"Humble" "Acting with justice, kindness and love" -

[dchill]

6. THEY DO NOT CARE.

[Hermit-The-Prog]

7. The Extreme Court might chastise TN for it being "voluntary" instead of "divinely commanded".

Roe, Roe, Roe your vote
against theocracy!
Republicans revoke your rights
and kill democracy!

THESE are the races that will determine control of the House of Representatives:
https://www.democraticunderground.com/100217175231

Stick 'em up for a blue wave: https://www.democraticunderground.com/100217078977

[no_hypocrisy]

8. They don't care. They have cover.

Let American Atheists, American Humanist Association, and/or Freedom From Religion Foundation take them to court.

They'll appeal it to USSC. They favor the Free Exercise Clause of the First Amendment over the Establishment Clause. When they rule, all states will have more than one "Days of Prayer."

[scarletlib]

9. Close but probably ok even if abhorrent.

Only mentions god—no names like Jesus, Allah etc. Depending on who you are god could be anyone of a thousand myriad gods floating around in the ether.