Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsJudges Are Playing 'Calvinball' With the Constitution Because They're Mad Trump was Banned from Twit
Link to tweet
https://www.thedailybeast.com/judges-are-playing-calvinball-with-the-constitution-because-theyre-mad-trump-was-banned-from-twitter
No paywall
https://archive.ph/ege8Z
A panel of judges in the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals has decided that editorial discretion is no longer a protected right under the First Amendmentbecause the judges are upset that Donald Trump was removed from Twitter.
I know that sounds impossible, but its exactly what happened.
[T]he Supreme Courts cases do not carve out editorial discretion as a special category of First-Amendment-protected expression, the court said, opening up a pandoras box of potential mischief.
The ruling is fractally wrong in the most frustrating ways. Just to understand any part of why its wrong, we could explore multiple layers of wrongness before even getting to why the final pronouncements in this ruling are wrong. (Writing this article is a struggle, as for each paragraph I was tempted to write an entire separate article detailing the underlying wrongness, but we only have so much space.)
SO, SO VERY WRONG
An astoundingly incomplete list of problems with the majority opinion include: its wrong about how the First Amendment works and the extent of what it protects; it gets so twisted up in its own made-up logic that it pretends the First Amendment limits private actors, rather than governments; it is so confused by how Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act actually works that the judge rewrites the law to say something it does not; bizarrely, it pretends that a law the court itself misrepresents (Section 230) is somehow relevant to the interpretation of the Constitution (which is not how anything works); it adds an element to the law it is analyzing that literally does not exist; it wholly ignores vital Supreme Court precedents; it pretends the plaintiffs waived a key argument they explicitly did not; it invents elements of common carrier law that do not exist; and it ignores the dormant commerce clause of the Constitution, which limits states ability to regulate interstate commerce.
*snip*
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
2 replies, 833 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (14)
ReplyReply to this post
2 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Judges Are Playing 'Calvinball' With the Constitution Because They're Mad Trump was Banned from Twit (Original Post)
Nevilledog
Sep 2022
OP
The GOP, Federalist Society, Moscow Mitch, and trump conspired to damage our Judiciary.
Hermit-The-Prog
Sep 2022
#1
Hermit-The-Prog
(33,315 posts)1. The GOP, Federalist Society, Moscow Mitch, and trump conspired to damage our Judiciary.
There are malignant tumors within the Judiciary branch that are going to damage whole swaths of established law, now that they have an Extreme Court at the top of the appeals process.
Kaleva
(36,294 posts)2. These judges seem to be more aligned with McConnell then TFG.