General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsElon Musk to debut "friendly" robot he says will not overpower humans
Link to tweet
https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2022/09/30/elon-musk-tesla-bot/
No paywall
https://archive.ph/0RSYz
SAN FRANCISCO Elon Musk wants to solve one of the toughest problems in robotics and artificial intelligence: how to make a machine that can replace a human.
For years, companies including Amazon and Google have worked to create robots that are able to move and in a feat that is deceptively challenging pick up or work on items with mechanized claws or hands.
That holy grail of tech, which would allow companies to replace human workers with inexhaustible robots, hasnt been achieved. But Tesla CEO Musk has said he may demonstrate the companys version, dubbed Optimus, at an AI event held by the company Friday evening.
Last year at the same event, Musk announced the robot. He said the cyborg would be uncombative, standing roughly 5-foot-8: Its intended to be friendly, of course. It would be designed to help with repetitive, menial tasks and usher in a future where physical work would be a choice.
Critically, Musk said, a person could run away from it and most likely overpower it.
*snip*
We're entering the Skynet timeline
ColinC
(8,284 posts)So... There's doubt?
CentralMass
(15,265 posts)Nevilledog
(51,055 posts)catbyte
(34,358 posts)I think I watched "The Terminator" one too many times.
SergeStorms
(19,190 posts)awwww....c'mon, you know you can't trust Elon Musk!
underpants
(182,717 posts)jmowreader
(50,543 posts)Wasnt that Grovelbot?
underpants
(182,717 posts)I needed a laugh!
dweller
(23,620 posts)That Musk is not one of them ?
🤔
✌🏻
Great question.
dalton99a
(81,426 posts)Aristus
(66,307 posts)genxlib
(5,524 posts)There is another statement that is much more ominous to me.
...usher in a future where physical work would be a choice."
Will it really be a choice if the industrialists decide that the robots are cheaper?
Will we also have the "choice" to buy food and shelter with non-existent wages?
History is full of utopian promises of leisurely lifestyles as technology takes over for labor.
Capitalism says otherwise.
durablend
(7,459 posts)What more you want ?
getagrip_already
(14,674 posts)It's straight out of the republican play book.
Shermann
(7,409 posts)That's not unnerving or anything.
/revision/latest?cb=20181218163943
Carlitos Brigante
(26,500 posts)Javaman
(62,507 posts)PortTack
(32,750 posts)nuxvomica
(12,418 posts)There's a concept called the "uncanny valley" whereby anything artificial that looks and acts close enough to a human but isn't is kind of nightmarish. Now if they all looked like R2-D2, C-3PO or Wall-E that might be ok.
Initech
(100,054 posts)chriscan64
(1,789 posts)"But when I do, I don't mean you guys."
Torchlight
(3,311 posts)Both seem insurmountable to me, but it looks like they're getting close and I'm not the brightest forty watt bulb.
PeaceWave
(24 posts)Presumably, the robots would not be programmed to do some of the evil things that have occurred to elderly people at the hands of paid "caregivers." Or, perhaps the robots could be programmed to beat senseless any caregiver that physically, verbally or emotionally abuses an elderly person. I'd be okay with that.
former9thward
(31,961 posts)The largest source of injuries to care facility workers are back injuries. They get them by trying to lift and move their patients. A robot might solve that big problem.
jmowreader
(50,543 posts)And if those worthless eaters who work for me even THINK about unionizing, I'll fire every last one of them and give their jobs to these robots.
CentralMass
(15,265 posts)KY_EnviroGuy
(14,489 posts)KY........
ananda
(28,854 posts)...
artemisia1
(756 posts)Demsrule86
(68,539 posts)Beetwasher.
(2,970 posts)Yeah, yeah, perfectly safe. I would never program an override into them that only I control. Not little old me. Hes a Bond villain.