Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Kolesar

(31,182 posts)
Wed Nov 7, 2012, 11:58 AM Nov 2012

MANY SAD RETURNS TODAY FOR THE NATIONAL RIFLE ASSOCIATION

SPENT more than $11.7 million against President Barack Obama - NRA defeated

SPENT more than $1 million against Sen. Sherrod Brown, OHIO - NRA defeated

SPENT more than $626,000 against Sen. Bill Nelson, FLORIDA - NRA defeated

SPENT more than $610,000 against Tim Kaine, Virginia (U.S. Senate) - NRA defeated

SPENT more than $341,000 against Sen. Claire McCaskill, MISSOURI - NRA defeated

SPENT more than $320,000 against Tammy Baldwin, WISCONSIN (U.S. Senate) - NRA defeated

SPENT more than $48,000 against Chris Murphy, Connecticut (U.S. Senate) - NRA defeated

What additional evidence is needed for elected officials and the media to finally discard the myth of the NRA's power to influence elections?

--Brady Campaign/Facebook feed

63 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
MANY SAD RETURNS TODAY FOR THE NATIONAL RIFLE ASSOCIATION (Original Post) Kolesar Nov 2012 OP
those cowards got exactly what they deserved Skittles Nov 2012 #1
Cowards is the right word. drm604 Nov 2012 #4
OMFG, seriously, drop this idiotic meme now. eqfan592 Nov 2012 #8
What other explanation is there for anyone wanting to carry a gun everywhere they go? Bandit Nov 2012 #18
Of course it's fear. Atypical Liberal Nov 2012 #25
You put it better than I did. eqfan592 Nov 2012 #29
Fear is the only explanation for somebody who is being obtuse. eqfan592 Nov 2012 #28
Opposing viewpoints always muddy a debate. drm604 Nov 2012 #39
Nice use of the balance fallacy. eqfan592 Nov 2012 #54
Fear has nothing to do with it glacierbay Nov 2012 #17
Exactly. It's inexpensive life insurance. nt rDigital Nov 2012 #36
"Cowards" is an easy expression on the Innertube. Eleanors38 Nov 2012 #35
they are batting ZERO. Members should not be happy how their dues were spent still_one Nov 2012 #2
Members dues do not go to the NRA Pac Kaleva Nov 2012 #14
maybe the nra should go back to what it used to be... madrchsod Nov 2012 #3
I think we're proving that money no longer buys elections. drm604 Nov 2012 #5
Maybe the Koch Bros would have been better off just paying it directly to voters FailureToCommunicate Nov 2012 #7
I long for the day when the NRA is a completely irrelevant force in politics. marmar Nov 2012 #6
Here's how: Quit pushing gun-control/prohibition.nt Eleanors38 Nov 2012 #13
Bingo. eqfan592 Nov 2012 #15
There were zero gun control measures on my ballot in this election. Occulus Nov 2012 #33
In Texas? Please. BTW, one can push culture war Eleanors38 Nov 2012 #40
Take Your Blame-The-Democrats Jive Elsewhere. Paladin Nov 2012 #37
Bradys? "Democrat?" They are thoroughly GOP... Eleanors38 Nov 2012 #43
Thanks for the numbers...those are big losses for the NRA FailureToCommunicate Nov 2012 #9
And the Brady Campaign will continue to be even more irrelevant than the NRA. eqfan592 Nov 2012 #10
Exactly. nt rDigital Nov 2012 #11
That's why you've got AK-wielding Democrats like me on your side derby378 Nov 2012 #24
I'm more of a Colt 6940 Democrat. : ) nt rDigital Nov 2012 #38
Did the Brady campaign devote their support to anything on your ballot? Occulus Nov 2012 #34
They Brady Campaign is still around? Angleae Nov 2012 #61
what a waste of dues leftyohiolib Nov 2012 #12
I agree Renew Deal Nov 2012 #22
Not quite "pro-gun," but he's working on it derby378 Nov 2012 #27
In spite of his vocalizing support for a ban on "assault weapons," I doubt it will happen. eqfan592 Nov 2012 #30
The current makeup of the Senate also makes it unlikely derby378 Nov 2012 #51
There is no dues money involved. ManiacJoe Nov 2012 #26
sure they dont leftyohiolib Nov 2012 #53
NRA talking points and links Kingofalldems Nov 2012 #16
GOP-talking points (Brady) included in your ban? Eleanors38 Nov 2012 #44
Please.... Kingofalldems Nov 2012 #49
Doesn't make them any less GOP.(nt) eqfan592 Nov 2012 #55
Unknown, as yet. In '08, then-head of Brady said Eleanors38 Nov 2012 #62
US Chamber of Commerce sancheztax Nov 2012 #19
Another stupid old-white-guy club bhikkhu Nov 2012 #23
and even stupider - none of that has anything to do with gun rights bhikkhu Nov 2012 #20
And Obama will still do nothing on Guns Renew Deal Nov 2012 #21
Rightfully so. eqfan592 Nov 2012 #31
Obama victories are usually good for Gun Sales.... Junkdrawer Nov 2012 #32
Good news. nt hack89 Nov 2012 #41
Wow! with that track record....... nolabels Nov 2012 #42
Yet many Dems seek NRA endorsement. hack89 Nov 2012 #45
So then is an NRA endorsement a useless ornament or not? nolabels Nov 2012 #47
The NRA is the premier organization in America for gun safety training hack89 Nov 2012 #48
How about for a right to own a firearm you would have to spend two years in active duty in military? nolabels Nov 2012 #50
It would be unconstitutional hack89 Nov 2012 #52
Just think how fun it could be nolabels Nov 2012 #59
All you need to do is amend the Constitution - it is not complicated. nt hack89 Nov 2012 #60
The NRA Backed Romney..... Paladin Nov 2012 #57
In 2010 the NRA endorsed 56 Dems running for Congress, including Harry Reid hack89 Nov 2012 #58
Last time is was "Obama is gonna take away your guns" ...didn't happen and it won't happen now. L0oniX Nov 2012 #46
Because of our President playing smart on this issue. nt eqfan592 Nov 2012 #56
Maybe next time they will stay in a Holidiay Inn Express! grantcart Nov 2012 #63

drm604

(16,230 posts)
4. Cowards is the right word.
Wed Nov 7, 2012, 12:03 PM
Nov 2012

Sure, there are a few here and there who's circumstances warrant it but other than them, why does anyone feel the need to carry a concealed weapon other than out of fear?

eqfan592

(5,963 posts)
8. OMFG, seriously, drop this idiotic meme now.
Wed Nov 7, 2012, 12:10 PM
Nov 2012

It has no sound logical basis, no sound statistical basis, and it just muddies the waters of the debate.

Bandit

(21,475 posts)
18. What other explanation is there for anyone wanting to carry a gun everywhere they go?
Wed Nov 7, 2012, 12:22 PM
Nov 2012

They have to be afraid of something or why bother? FEAR is the ONLY explanation.

 

Atypical Liberal

(5,412 posts)
25. Of course it's fear.
Wed Nov 7, 2012, 12:31 PM
Nov 2012

But not like you think.

Look, "fear" of car accidents is why I wear a seat belt every day. Fear of fire is why I have smoke detectors in my home. Fear of carbon monoxide poisoning is why I have CO detectors in my home.

This doesn't mean that I am some kind of paranoid person living in desperate fear of car accidents, fires, or suffocation. It's just that the tools for handling these situations are cheap and easy to obtain, and they don't hurt anyone, so it's easy to be prepared.

Carrying a firearm is the same way. Odds are, you'll never need one. Violent crime has been on the decline for decades now. But firearms are cheap and easy to obtain, and people with permits to carry them are hardly ever involved in crime - less so than people without them - so it's no big deal.

eqfan592

(5,963 posts)
28. Fear is the only explanation for somebody who is being obtuse.
Wed Nov 7, 2012, 12:34 PM
Nov 2012

Somebody taking a precaution against an eventuality, even an unlikely one, does not mean that person is living in fear OF that eventuality.

drm604

(16,230 posts)
39. Opposing viewpoints always muddy a debate.
Wed Nov 7, 2012, 12:58 PM
Nov 2012

That's the nature of debate. You don't get to stifle opposition just so that you can have a nice clean non-muddy non-debate.

And you don't get to just end debate by calling something an "idiotic meme" and demanding that it be dropped. If that's how it works then I could just throw the same demand back at you and your viewpoint.

In fact, that's what I'll do (since you can do it): Your whole argument is an idiotic meme and muddies the water and you should just drop it.

I did not come in here intending to get into a gun debate so I am out of here.

eqfan592

(5,963 posts)
54. Nice use of the balance fallacy.
Wed Nov 7, 2012, 03:55 PM
Nov 2012

Simply because you have a viewpoint doesn't mean it is one grounded in reality and thus deserving of respect. Such idiocy only serves to stifle real debate, not facilitate it.

But since you weren't even interested in a debate on this issue anyway, then I question why you decided to make such an inflamatory remark in the first place. Sorry, but your faux rage post is laughable.

 

glacierbay

(2,477 posts)
17. Fear has nothing to do with it
Wed Nov 7, 2012, 12:21 PM
Nov 2012

you do know that the police aren't responsible for the individual citizens safety unless in our custody? We're only responsible for the general publics safety, you are responsible for your own safety, that's why citizens obtain CC permits, not out of fear, but to be able to protect themselves if it ever came to that.

 

Eleanors38

(18,318 posts)
35. "Cowards" is an easy expression on the Innertube.
Wed Nov 7, 2012, 12:52 PM
Nov 2012

There are millions of fellow Americans who would take issue with that smear.

Kaleva

(36,290 posts)
14. Members dues do not go to the NRA Pac
Wed Nov 7, 2012, 12:17 PM
Nov 2012

The NRA-ILA relies on donations from members and non-members to fund its political activities. The NRA charter prohibits dues paid by members to be used for such.

madrchsod

(58,162 posts)
3. maybe the nra should go back to what it used to be...
Wed Nov 7, 2012, 12:02 PM
Nov 2012

a hunters magazine instead of a gun owners political magazine

drm604

(16,230 posts)
5. I think we're proving that money no longer buys elections.
Wed Nov 7, 2012, 12:05 PM
Nov 2012

I wonder how much the Kochs spent against Obama. Whatever the amount, they threw it away.

eqfan592

(5,963 posts)
15. Bingo.
Wed Nov 7, 2012, 12:18 PM
Nov 2012

Lets stop getting hung up on an implement and start targeting the root causes of crime (poverty, education, etc.). The political capital we waste on failed gun control measures is costing us dearly in our ability to tackle the these other, significantly more important issues.

Occulus

(20,599 posts)
33. There were zero gun control measures on my ballot in this election.
Wed Nov 7, 2012, 12:49 PM
Nov 2012

Did yours contain any measures associated with gun control legislation?

 

Eleanors38

(18,318 posts)
40. In Texas? Please. BTW, one can push culture war
Wed Nov 7, 2012, 01:02 PM
Nov 2012

without ballot measures, and still spread the stink around.

This is a solid fact: The gun-control outlook MADE the modern "post-Fudd" NRA.

I look forward to the GOP-led, GOP-founded Brady Center fading into even greater irrelevency.

Paladin

(28,246 posts)
37. Take Your Blame-The-Democrats Jive Elsewhere.
Wed Nov 7, 2012, 12:53 PM
Nov 2012

It doesn't sell around here---particularly on a day like today.......
 

Eleanors38

(18,318 posts)
43. Bradys? "Democrat?" They are thoroughly GOP...
Wed Nov 7, 2012, 01:09 PM
Nov 2012

Do try to keep your Republican allies in the right column.

Again, hard fact: Gun-controllers made the modern NRA.

HA! Republicans begetting Republicans; such spurrious issue.

eqfan592

(5,963 posts)
10. And the Brady Campaign will continue to be even more irrelevant than the NRA.
Wed Nov 7, 2012, 12:12 PM
Nov 2012

Because say what you like about the NRA, the Brady Campaign is at least as disingenuous as the NRA, but with less popular support.

derby378

(30,252 posts)
24. That's why you've got AK-wielding Democrats like me on your side
Wed Nov 7, 2012, 12:30 PM
Nov 2012

Let's remember that Sen. Gillibrand in NY flip-flopped on guns after being threatened with a primary challenge by Carolyn McCarthy and leaned on heavily by Chuck Schumer and his Brady Campaign advisors. Now maybe I'm not running for a seat in the US House or Senate, but even if I was, I think you'd find me a much tougher nut to crack.

Occulus

(20,599 posts)
34. Did the Brady campaign devote their support to anything on your ballot?
Wed Nov 7, 2012, 12:51 PM
Nov 2012

Mine listed no measures even tangentially associated with the Brady campaign.

derby378

(30,252 posts)
27. Not quite "pro-gun," but he's working on it
Wed Nov 7, 2012, 12:32 PM
Nov 2012

He has vocalized support for a ban on "assault weapons," whatever they might be, but some of his policies regarding National Parks and Amtrak have been surprisingly reasonable and conciliatory towards Second Amendment activists.

eqfan592

(5,963 posts)
30. In spite of his vocalizing support for a ban on "assault weapons," I doubt it will happen.
Wed Nov 7, 2012, 12:37 PM
Nov 2012

Strongly doubt in fact. It has been, and continues to be a poison pill issue. I'd be curious to see the stats in NC on how many single issue voters voted against him because of his mentioning of an "assault weapons" ban.

derby378

(30,252 posts)
51. The current makeup of the Senate also makes it unlikely
Wed Nov 7, 2012, 03:44 PM
Nov 2012

I think we can expect "no" votes from (among others) Jon Tester, Ben Casey, and Joe Donnelly - and let's not forget Majority Leader Harry Reid.

 

Eleanors38

(18,318 posts)
62. Unknown, as yet. In '08, then-head of Brady said
Thu Nov 8, 2012, 07:48 AM
Nov 2012

he was undecided as to who to vote for in presidential race. You may recall, McCain supported an AWB.

Of course, few Demos want a Brady enbdorsement. Wonder why.

There is NOTHING liberal about gun control.

bhikkhu

(10,714 posts)
23. Another stupid old-white-guy club
Wed Nov 7, 2012, 12:28 PM
Nov 2012

If they just did what they were supposedly there for, and thought a bit that the idea that "we are all inherently equal in rights and dignity" is actually good for business, then they might see a useful way forward.

bhikkhu

(10,714 posts)
20. and even stupider - none of that has anything to do with gun rights
Wed Nov 7, 2012, 12:25 PM
Nov 2012

which have been doing just fine under Obama and democratic legislatures. They've got to stop being an old-white-guy club.

eqfan592

(5,963 posts)
31. Rightfully so.
Wed Nov 7, 2012, 12:40 PM
Nov 2012

Because it is a poison pill issue that serves no useful purpose. It's wasted political capital better spent on fighting poverty and improving our education system, things that may have a chance at reducing our violent crime rate even further, unlike more gun control laws.

Junkdrawer

(27,993 posts)
32. Obama victories are usually good for Gun Sales....
Wed Nov 7, 2012, 12:43 PM
Nov 2012

"He's going to grab our guns for SURE this time."

Wayne and his REAL backers are crying all the way to the bank.

nolabels

(13,133 posts)
42. Wow! with that track record.......
Wed Nov 7, 2012, 01:05 PM
Nov 2012

A kiss of %#$@ is what the real deal is.

It is kind of like if some gun nuts were to send your candidacy some money run to Fed-ex immediately to rush it right back

hack89

(39,171 posts)
45. Yet many Dems seek NRA endorsement.
Wed Nov 7, 2012, 01:15 PM
Nov 2012

Harry Reid immediately comes to mine. The NRA endorsed 56 Dems in congressional races in 2010 - with many more in local races.

Their policy is to endorse a pro-2A incumbent regardless of party.

nolabels

(13,133 posts)
47. So then is an NRA endorsement a useless ornament or not?
Wed Nov 7, 2012, 02:05 PM
Nov 2012

I would say the NRA would be much better served in furthering their cause if they got out of politics and instead spent the money on training of would be gun owners on security, handling and safe recreational use of their firearms. I don't see anything wrong of ownership but giving someone the idea that possession of such give a leg up on others is a bad idea especially with the idea it gives an excuse or a way out of something. Violence, intimidation and the magic bullet never solves anything and often makes matters worse.

Imagine what it would be like if people didn't see firearms as a weapon against other people and was just a sport like baseball or basketball. If the NRA spent their extra millions in some kind of target contests with worthwhile or even big prizes for the contestants. If you think about it, a hammer is as only as smart as the person holding it.

hack89

(39,171 posts)
48. The NRA is the premier organization in America for gun safety training
Wed Nov 7, 2012, 02:30 PM
Nov 2012

it is the gold standard. Their Eddie Eagle GunSafe Program is the best program in the country for teaching gun safety to young kids.

Lets remember what got the NRA into politics in the first place - the 1992 Assault Weapon Ban. Want the NRA out of politics then take gun control out of politics.

nolabels

(13,133 posts)
50. How about for a right to own a firearm you would have to spend two years in active duty in military?
Wed Nov 7, 2012, 02:54 PM
Nov 2012

or six years in the reserves.

And for correction

"Originally, the NRA was not as involved in the political process as it is today. In 1980, they endorsed a US presidential candidate (Ronald Reagan) for the first time in their history."

History of the National Rifle Association and Guns | Guns Guns Guns:
http://www.gunsgunsguns.com/resources/history-of-the-national-rifle-association-and-guns.html

Yea, and that is why i can tune in sports center and see a major golf update and nothing about a sharpshooting championship. Most anything has a hard time going main stream as long as it people with crazy ideas behind it

hack89

(39,171 posts)
52. It would be unconstitutional
Wed Nov 7, 2012, 03:45 PM
Nov 2012

the military is so small relative to the population as well as being very selective that your measure would be a defacto ban on exercising a civil liberty.

nolabels

(13,133 posts)
59. Just think how fun it could be
Wed Nov 7, 2012, 04:51 PM
Nov 2012

Going out in the cold and the snow or the heat and rain for field exercises. Getting up at 3:35 am so you shine your boots before the morning inspection. It's just freaking insane that some people think owning a firearm something to toy with. The idea of individuals having firearms in their personal control was was put on us when we had no real military. But now we have a military much larger than most anyone else, so what is so important, owning the firearm or a large military. It's like a lot redundant.

Civil liberty is a crock of shit unless you have a good reason to need and use it. I could figure out many things that others might think are a infringement on such supposed freedom type ideas. But being a pawn to any kind of lobby for others unearned enrichment is not my cup of tea. The place i live in is a give and take, and more militarism to bolster someone else's idea of what patriotism should look like a dead end to me.

Besides i spent my time in the service and already have had my fun

Paladin

(28,246 posts)
57. The NRA Backed Romney.....
Wed Nov 7, 2012, 04:23 PM
Nov 2012

...even though Romney endorsed an assault weapons ban. The fact that Romney was a Republican was all the NRA required. And let's see Wayne LaPierre and Ted Nugent "take gun control out of politics," then maybe we'll talk.

And Eddie Eagle better stay the fuck out of my school district. If I find out the NRA is infiltrating the local schools, I'm not going to be happy.

hack89

(39,171 posts)
58. In 2010 the NRA endorsed 56 Dems running for Congress, including Harry Reid
Wed Nov 7, 2012, 04:28 PM
Nov 2012

if you are a pro-2A incumbent they will endorse you. They routinely endorse democrats at the state level.

So you would jeopardize the safety of children on the altar of your anti-gun beliefs? What if there is no organization available with the proper political beliefs?

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»MANY SAD RETURNS TODAY FO...