General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsJury debated 45 minutes before finding Murdaugh guilty.
Now that's swift justice.
Response to Cattledog (Original post)
Chin music This message was self-deleted by its author.
FBaggins
(26,721 posts)15 min to make sure everyones name was spelled correctly
15 min to fill out the paperwork.
Actual deliberation 12.4 seconds
ProfessorGAC
(64,869 posts)...in March of 2020.
They picked me as foreperson, and I just went around the table. Never offered my opinion, just managed the conversation. I could tell in 3 minutes where thus was going. 5-7 more minutes and I asked "Did the prosecution even prove there was a crime?" Got 11 head shakes.
I took ONE vote. 12-0 not guilty.
Called the bailiff, she gives us the form, we sign it. It was 10 minutes total.
The only reason we stayed in the room another 5 or 6 minutes was waiting for the judge & lawyers to get back in the courtroom.
I'd say under 20 from judge's instructions to "case diskissed" was 22 minutes.
PJMcK
(21,998 posts)The prosecutions case was very weak. The police officer who testified for the prosecution was obviously lying. The law that the defendant was charged with was a terrible law that conflated a tool with a weapon.
The trial took 2 1/2 days. We voted to acquit in less than 10 minutes. The prosecutor was stunned, the defense lawyer was fantastic and saved the man from an unjust law.
In the jury room, youre supposed to use your common sense. Thankfully, thats what happened in the Murdoch trial.
ProfessorGAC
(64,869 posts)Same situation. I told the prosecutor afterwards that he didn't even prove there was a crime committed, let alone that the guy on trial did it.
Also a very weak case. I'm surprised there was an indictment.
PJMcK
(21,998 posts)Your jury, like mine, prevented a mis-carriage of Justice.
The system actually works, sometimes.
ProfessorGAC
(64,869 posts)I'm surprised the prosecutor would risk the hit on their conviction record on so thin a beef.
Yet, there we were.
I have NEVER had a "what if" moment over this. I was that certain we got it right.
gratuitous
(82,849 posts)I didn't watch any of the trial footage, but I understand practically the first thing Murdaugh testified to was that he lied to the cops when they arrived on the scene. I can just imagine every juror in the jury box immediately thought, "Well, if he lied to the cops, is he lying to us?" Every attorney can recite the maxim, "falsus in uno, falsus in omnibus." Murdaugh apparently didn't think the jury would apply it to him.