Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
8 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Jury debated 45 minutes before finding Murdaugh guilty. (Original Post) Cattledog Mar 2023 OP
This message was self-deleted by its author Chin music Mar 2023 #1
15 min restroom break... FBaggins Mar 2023 #2
I Was On A Jury... ProfessorGAC Mar 2023 #4
I was on a criminal trial jury a couple of years ago PJMcK Mar 2023 #3
See My Post Above You ProfessorGAC Mar 2023 #5
Doesn't it make you feel a little good? PJMcK Mar 2023 #6
For Sure! ProfessorGAC Mar 2023 #7
I can just imagine gratuitous Mar 2023 #8

Response to Cattledog (Original post)

FBaggins

(26,721 posts)
2. 15 min restroom break...
Fri Mar 3, 2023, 12:14 PM
Mar 2023

15 min to make sure everyone’s name was spelled correctly… 15 min to fill out the paperwork.

Actual deliberation 12.4 seconds

ProfessorGAC

(64,869 posts)
4. I Was On A Jury...
Fri Mar 3, 2023, 12:32 PM
Mar 2023

...in March of 2020.
They picked me as foreperson, and I just went around the table. Never offered my opinion, just managed the conversation. I could tell in 3 minutes where thus was going. 5-7 more minutes and I asked "Did the prosecution even prove there was a crime?" Got 11 head shakes.
I took ONE vote. 12-0 not guilty.
Called the bailiff, she gives us the form, we sign it. It was 10 minutes total.
The only reason we stayed in the room another 5 or 6 minutes was waiting for the judge & lawyers to get back in the courtroom.
I'd say under 20 from judge's instructions to "case diskissed" was 22 minutes.

PJMcK

(21,998 posts)
3. I was on a criminal trial jury a couple of years ago
Fri Mar 3, 2023, 12:29 PM
Mar 2023

The prosecution’s case was very weak. The police officer who testified for the prosecution was obviously lying. The law that the defendant was charged with was a terrible law that conflated a tool with a weapon.

The trial took 2 1/2 days. We voted to acquit in less than 10 minutes. The prosecutor was stunned, the defense lawyer was fantastic and saved the man from an unjust law.

In the jury room, you’re supposed to use your common sense. Thankfully, that’s what happened in the Murdoch trial.

ProfessorGAC

(64,869 posts)
5. See My Post Above You
Fri Mar 3, 2023, 12:34 PM
Mar 2023

Same situation. I told the prosecutor afterwards that he didn't even prove there was a crime committed, let alone that the guy on trial did it.
Also a very weak case. I'm surprised there was an indictment.

PJMcK

(21,998 posts)
6. Doesn't it make you feel a little good?
Fri Mar 3, 2023, 12:40 PM
Mar 2023

Your jury, like mine, prevented a mis-carriage of Justice.

The system actually works, sometimes.

ProfessorGAC

(64,869 posts)
7. For Sure!
Fri Mar 3, 2023, 12:43 PM
Mar 2023

I'm surprised the prosecutor would risk the hit on their conviction record on so thin a beef.
Yet, there we were.
I have NEVER had a "what if" moment over this. I was that certain we got it right.

gratuitous

(82,849 posts)
8. I can just imagine
Fri Mar 3, 2023, 01:15 PM
Mar 2023

I didn't watch any of the trial footage, but I understand practically the first thing Murdaugh testified to was that he lied to the cops when they arrived on the scene. I can just imagine every juror in the jury box immediately thought, "Well, if he lied to the cops, is he lying to us?" Every attorney can recite the maxim, "falsus in uno, falsus in omnibus." Murdaugh apparently didn't think the jury would apply it to him.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Jury debated 45 minutes b...