Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

bigtree

(85,987 posts)
Wed Mar 8, 2023, 11:35 PM Mar 2023

Jan 6. committee prosecutor Tim Heaphy: I expect (charges) sometime in the next four to six months.

excerpt from Wednesday's MSNBC interview of Tim Heaphy, who was the lead investigator for the House Jan. 6 committee. He weighed in on the proper timeline for a potential Donald Trump prosecution, and more.


Tim Heaphy:

I think DOJ is mindful of the traditional department policy that you don’t want to bring charges that may impact an election and therefore they need to be brought well in advance of the 2024 election if they are implicating a candidate for president.

So I expect it sometime in the next four to six months. Ideally, they bring a case sometime this spring or summer. If it goes into the fall, then you’re starting to be into primary season and getting closer to an election — and of course, once a charge is brought, there’s a lot that happens before the trial and the matter is adjudicated.

So they need to bring it soon enough for that ideally to run its course well before the 2024 election. And look, what they’re doing now, it really seems like the end stage because of the subpoena to former Vice President [Mike Pence], to the president’s daughter and son-in-law. They’re pretty close now, it seems to me, to the most important witnesses, so I think that they are likely close to the end.

...I have learned over the years: You just really can’t predict what happens with criminal cases, with trials. Sometimes they go really slowly. Sometimes they go fast. There are curveballs that happen all the time. I don’t know. I mean, you’re right. The standard here would be (a Trump trial) would take a year or so. There will be contested pretrial motions type issues. But I won’t be surprised if it goes faster.


read more: https://www.msnbc.com/deadline-white-house/deadline-legal-blog/tucker-carlson-fox-news-tim-heaphy-interview-rcna73985
19 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Jan 6. committee prosecutor Tim Heaphy: I expect (charges) sometime in the next four to six months. (Original Post) bigtree Mar 2023 OP
They Aren't Going To Get Testimony From Pence For At Least 6-8 Months SoCalDavidS Mar 2023 #1
100 % agree chicoescuela Mar 2023 #2
they've made choices like this before at DOJ bigtree Mar 2023 #3
I'd Love To See Him Indicted. I Just Do Not Expect That He Will Be. SoCalDavidS Mar 2023 #5
whatever bigtree Mar 2023 #11
It only took 2 months for SCOTUS to rule on Trump's privilege claims Fiendish Thingy Mar 2023 #18
Another/something supposedly for me to live for. UTUSN Mar 2023 #4
take it for what it's worth bigtree Mar 2023 #7
I like what I understand, thanks. UTUSN Mar 2023 #10
Any minute now. We're about to turn the corner. Marcus IM Mar 2023 #6
oooh edgy, mocking justice. bigtree Mar 2023 #8
No. Snarky about much of the undue "any minute now" projections. Marcus IM Mar 2023 #17
It's Imminent brettdale Mar 2023 #9
yeah, mocking the pursuit of justice against Trump is actually not the snark you think it is bigtree Mar 2023 #12
Hear. Hear. Beakybird Mar 2023 #14
It's called being a realist brettdale Mar 2023 #19
Meanwhile . . . Cartoonist Mar 2023 #13
Recommended. H2O Man Mar 2023 #15
Fascinating, how two people can watch the same interview Fiendish Thingy Mar 2023 #16

SoCalDavidS

(9,998 posts)
1. They Aren't Going To Get Testimony From Pence For At Least 6-8 Months
Wed Mar 8, 2023, 11:40 PM
Mar 2023

Teflon Man is not going to be indicted. He's Above The Law.

bigtree

(85,987 posts)
3. they've made choices like this before at DOJ
Wed Mar 8, 2023, 11:51 PM
Mar 2023

...DOJ has already demonstrated they'll cut away from a protracted fight over privilege.

We have no way of knowing if prosecutors already have enough to work around these principal witnesses. To my eye, they already know what these perps like Pence will cop to. At this stage its a matter of parading them in front of the grand jury to tell their tales to jurors already steeped in evidence and testimony from their underlings.

Pence will be squeezed as far as they're able. And if all he does is plead the 5th, it may not be credible for jurors already in the end stage, no matter how many times the judge tells them to disregard it. This isn't a zero-sum prosecution. It's a wide-ranging investigation involving hundreds of witnesses. This doesn't all ride on what Pence does.

SoCalDavidS

(9,998 posts)
5. I'd Love To See Him Indicted. I Just Do Not Expect That He Will Be.
Thu Mar 9, 2023, 12:01 AM
Mar 2023

I've been saying since at least 2019, that he's Above The Law.

So far, there has been NOTHING to indicate that was wrong.

bigtree

(85,987 posts)
11. whatever
Thu Mar 9, 2023, 12:17 AM
Mar 2023

...you start with the proposition that nothing will happen, and you don't bother to look for anything to happen.

It's not an actual view of the investigation, it's a view of your cynicism. Not very interesting.

Certainly not a counter to the lead investigator for the House Select Committee on the January 6 attack. I'd be embarrassed to say all that in front of someone who pursued justice in this case as diligently as Mr. Heaphy, but your mileage may vary.

Fiendish Thingy

(15,585 posts)
18. It only took 2 months for SCOTUS to rule on Trump's privilege claims
Thu Mar 9, 2023, 01:33 AM
Mar 2023

And about that for a court to rule on Lindsay Graham’s Speech & Debate claim.

Regardless, Pence’s testimony is not as critical as some think.

bigtree

(85,987 posts)
7. take it for what it's worth
Thu Mar 9, 2023, 12:10 AM
Mar 2023

...it should have at least as much credence as a second-hand account just posted that claims Heaphy said charges would be after the election.

Not what he says here at all. It's really the only reason I bother to post this shit, because the misinformation flows like wine and anxious folks are all too happy to imbibe of pessimistic views and accounts of the investigation posted here.

Really amazing to me how folks shy away from even factual accounts of progress, but grab on to angst like it's the ultimate wisdom. I really wouldn't bother, but I come here for info and support for the DOJ fight and I find the opposite.

I guess people must think I live for this.

bigtree

(85,987 posts)
8. oooh edgy, mocking justice.
Thu Mar 9, 2023, 12:11 AM
Mar 2023

....coming in snarky to slam any optimism.

You have to ask why? What actual purpose is in this? What's it for?

Marcus IM

(2,192 posts)
17. No. Snarky about much of the undue "any minute now" projections.
Thu Mar 9, 2023, 01:32 AM
Mar 2023

I stopped getting breathless about the prospect of justice being served quickly after the outcome of the perfect phone call.

Not holding my breath. But, I'll celebrate if/when the tRump frog marches begin.


brettdale

(12,377 posts)
9. It's Imminent
Thu Mar 9, 2023, 12:12 AM
Mar 2023

Im just wondering who will be the first to Indict Trump?

Fanni?
Tim?
Other?

Maybe arrests tomorrow???

Next week at the latest!

bigtree

(85,987 posts)
12. yeah, mocking the pursuit of justice against Trump is actually not the snark you think it is
Thu Mar 9, 2023, 12:24 AM
Mar 2023

...it shows nothing but contempt for the multi-dozens of prosecutors working exclusively on Trump investigations, dual DOJ grand juries with over 40 jurors between them, and people like me who support their pursuit of justice against Trump and his co-conspirators.

Posting juvenile crap like this isn't suppport for justice against Trump, it's baiting and does nothing but divert from that pursuit.

brettdale

(12,377 posts)
19. It's called being a realist
Thu Mar 9, 2023, 03:58 AM
Mar 2023

I was all in on Fitmaz,

I was all in, Bush Jnr is going to Jail.

I was all in on Im sure there will be some males that will go
to Jail for raping kids at Jeff's Island, not just Maxwell.

I was all in, Prince Andrew is going down.

Ive been all in Trump is going down.

We have to face facts.

BAD PEOPLE WIN.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Jan 6. committee prosecut...